Reply With Quote
We had a prime Duncan in 2003 though. And Willis and Kerr off the bench. Oh and Danny Ferry
There's something 2003-ish about tonight's win, tbh...
1) One heck of an MVP performance by our MVP
2) We came back to win a defensive slugfest
3) We held them under 100... even though there was an OT period
4) We couldn't hit a ing free throw
5) We couldn't hit many threes
6) Defense reigned supreme, and
7) We won.
That's right, Biatches.
So, guys... do you like tonight's NOLA win better, or last year's? Explain.
We had a prime Duncan in 2003 though. And Willis and Kerr off the bench. Oh and Danny Ferry
2003 Duncan >>>>> 2017 Kawhi
Grind this out. But they need to start hitting shots.
you just listed the oldest and worst players on that bench, well unless you count Mengke Bateer who was inactive all year
I'd beg to differ. Kawhi is scoring more than Duncan ever did. And it's a lot easier to be a premier defender as a big than a medium.
Oh wait, forgot Steve Smith!
Of course, pre-prime Kawhi vs peak Duncan... not saying Kawhi will get there, but obvious post is obviously obvious
2003 lakers>>>>>>>2017 warriors
That old vintage unpleasant way Spurs win easy games, making it look like Platoon.
You're trippin', it's not all numbers. The aura Duncan had more than anything was what puts him ahead of current Kawhi
Definitely NOT true, unless you're joking... you have to be joking, right? That team was injured, tired, and honestly bored of trying hard and winning every year by that point.
Kawhi is a stud but nowhere near peak Duncan at this point
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
