off, you haven't even read the report. It's nothing but a compilation of news articles.
100% factual
this bull again. i've laid out my position on this issue very firmly in this thread, and you cover your ears, go "la la la i'm not listening" and then say "you didn't take a position"
i'm not going to sit and argue with you about whether or not i've taken a position when it's been articulated in this very thread
off, you haven't even read the report. It's nothing but a compilation of news articles.
100% factual
i will concede that i haven't taken a position specific to the false dichotomy you've created
Philo, quoting Th'Pussy in a support gesture then using the "I didn't say it" defense. So because you didn't say it (but you quoted it) it's not your position?
Phorever Philo
Did Th"Pusher not suggest regulating the supply to address the demand?
Did you not quote that and say I need to read it more carefully, no doubt going for the plebe law student "drug use, not drug problem" angle?
Poor wording on my part. The point is, people use drugs because they want to, then need to. We have a model for leagalized drug which includes regulation.
^ this was all a result of chasing your liberals/guns/regulation false equivalence. It's totally irrelevant to the initial point, which was to reduce incarceration rates by addressing the way we treat drugs and drug users.
Im at a bar with a few shots on me
I promise il respond cheers![]()
checks ST from a bar
business with China
If you're going to admit you ed up, don't try to apply a caveat of "you made me do it". I didn't make you say and defend stupid . I didn't make Philo defend it either. You can see it doesn't make any sense now, but still you both defended it on and on.
The real problem isn't supply or demand. The real problem is the effect drug use has on people and society. The way to mitigate that though involves hard choices, like isolationist policies against users and abusers. If you're going to legalize a harmful substance where you already have a high percentage of the user population addicted, then you better be ready to deal with the consequences. The only thing keeping some people from going off the chain is the difficult of acquiring the product. Look at how many alcoholics there are. Compare that to how many meth heads you know, or coke heads, or pot heads. We all know some pot heads, but you know a of a lot more alcoholics. What's the number one cause of traffic fatalities?
I don't care if they legalize all of it and let people kill themselves. I've said as much, but the "drug abuse" problem isn't going to be salved by reducing the amount of legal attention it gets. Prison population would just be on the street instead.
Yup where u checkiing St from? Ur moms pussy?![]()
how old are you 5
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)