Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions

[djohn2oo8]

They already gave them until next monday to come up with the evidence. Too much time imo, specially when they dont have anyting and are clearly just stalling.

They are letting theme hang themselves some more. There is no evidence. And it will all come out during the hearing.

[TSA]

No, you're just simply a moron who cant tell the difference from can and cant.

That is why you lost your main account. Idiocy.

Can and can't have nothing to do with you claim of "was about to be indicted."

This will go over your had as evidenced by your next reply.

[TSA]

They are letting theme hang themselves some more. There is no evidence. And it will all come out during the hearing.

If true, what are your thoughts on Obama having British intelligence spy on the Trump team as a workaround of spying on a US citizen?

[Reck]

Can and can't have nothing to do with you claim of "was about to be indicted."

This will go over your had as evidenced by your next reply.

You're one stupid . Seriously. Not even an insult.

That is what you are.

You're one of those idiots who likes to get pummel before running and hiding.


So let's start.

He said he is “100-percent certain” that the FBI has enough evidence to indict and convict.

“there is ample evidence to indict her. And the only way she wouldn’t be is if the President or the Attorney General makes a political decision.”

“He (Pagliano) knows who led it and he knows who was in it, and he’s about to spill the beans to a grand jury,” Napolitano said.


The Judge added that Hillary “should be terrified of the fact that he’s been granted immunity.”

1. Judge Andrew Napolitano
Judge Napolitano was seemingly ever-present on Fox News during the Clinton investigation, confidently discussing the likelihood of an indictment. Just this past Friday, Judge Napolitano said on Fox Business that there was clearly enough evidence to indict and convict Clinton. He went on to say that likelihood of an indictment had “increased dramatically” when it was reported that Lynch would accept the FBI’s recommendation.

And finally:

Since you're a lazy got, go straight to 3:40

[TSA]

You're one stupid . Seriously. Not even an insult.

That is what you are.

You're one of those idiots who likes to get pummel before running and hiding.


So let's start.









And finally:

Since you're a lazy got, go straight to 3:40

you on yourself again

Everything you just posted supports "could and should" be indicted. He never said she "was going to be indicted". O'Reiily even asked him straight up if he tought she'd be indicted and he didn't answer yes.

Like I just said, you'd prove your stupidity with the very next post. At least you are consistent, nice self pummeling

Since you're a stupid , go straight to 3:32

[Reck]

Same guy who said Hillary was about to get indicted?

you on yourself again

Everything you just posted supports "could and should" be indicted. He never said she "was going to be indicted". O'Reiily even asked him straight up if he tought she'd be indicted and he didn't answer yes.

Like I just said, you'd prove your stupidity with the very next post. At least you are consistent, nice self pummeling

Since you're a stupid , go straight to 3:32

Every single quote backs my main post. He throught she was going to get indicted and that's a fact.

It doesn't matter that he didn't say she would. He thought she was going to which my post indicates. "about to..."

Dumb .

Do you believe the FBI will release the indictment?

Yes.

[TSA]

Every single quote backs my main post. He throught she was going to get indicted and that's a fact.

It doesn't matter that he didn't say she would. He thought she was going to which my post indicates. "about to..."

Dumb .

Do you believe the FBI will release the indictment?

Yes.

He NEVER said he thought she would be or was about to be indicted

[TSA]

You're one of those idiots that likes to get pummeled and then come back for multiple pummelings

Proof of this will be your next post

[Reck]

He NEVER said he thought she would be or was about to be indicted

Yeah, of coure. He was only on Fox every night parroting and saying every which way she was going to get indicted.

Only a dumb like you doesn't see it. He was a front runner on the Hillary will get indicted now just watch.

The fact you dont see it it's hilarious.

[TSA]

Yeah, of coure. He was only on Fox every night parroting and saying every which way she was going to get indicted.

Only a dumb like you doesn't see it. He was a front runner on the Hillary will get indicted now just watch.

The fact you dont see it it's hilarious.

Was he on Fox every night saying how she could and should be indicted or was he saying how she was going to be indicted?

You can use his quotes from post #1604 you worked so hard on for reference

[Reck]

TSA doesn't know how to work youtube. I forgot about that.



Blonde chick : you really think she's gonna get charged with a felony?

TSA teebagger:Well I think that the FBI will reccomend that she'd be indicted.

come tell me that's not what he said.

[TSA]

TSA doesn't know how to work youtube. I forgot about that.



Blonde chick : you really think she's gonna get charged with a felony?

TSA teebagger:Well I think that the FBI will reccomend that she'd be indicted.

come tell me that's not what he said.

That isn't him saying she will be indicted or was about to be indicted (your claim)
You keep supporting me and ting on yourself.

[Reck]

That isn't him saying she will be indicted or was about to be indicted (your claim)
You keep supporting me and ting on yourself.

Is this some alternative Trump reality you live in?

The "think" part is him believing the FBI will reccomend indictment. That is his opinion, not anybody's.

You're so stupid you are still hung up on whether he says she will get indicted vs I think she will which is essentially what he thinks will happen, which in turn means that is his train of thought.

Having to explain basic thinking to you.

[TSA]

You're so stupid you are still hung up on whether he says she will get indicted vs I think she will which is essentially what he thinks will happen, which in turn means that is his train of thought.

I think she is pregnant

She is pregnant

Do you see the difference?

[spurraider21]

I think she is pregnant

She is pregnant

Do you see the difference?

yes. scenario A is a re

[Reck]

I think she is pregnant

She is pregnant

Do you see the difference?

What's your point?

The guy thought she would be indicted and that's the crux of the argument. There are plenty of videos and articles of him saying she would be and that it was eminent. That's pretty much a fact.

She should be prosecuted

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/...nd-center.html

For someone doubting she will be indicted and prosecuted, he sure likes to write and talk about it...half a year later.

[TSA]

There are plenty of videos and articles of him saying she would be and that it was eminent. That's pretty much a fact.

If there are plenty of videos and articles of him saying she would be and that it was imminent why haven't you posted one? All you have posted so far is him saying she could and should be, quite different than your claim of him saying she will be.

[Reck]

If there are plenty of videos and articles of him saying she would be and that it was imminent why haven't you posted one? All you have posted so far is him saying she could and should be, quite different than your claim of him saying she will be.

There is this thing called youtube and google. Enough hand holding.

[TSA]

There is this thing called youtube and google. Enough hand holding.

You do realize you've only been posting videos that don't support your claim correct?

[Reck]

You do realize you've only been posting videos that don't support your claim correct?

Of course to you they dont. You wouldn't know what hit you if the rock was the size of your head.

[TSA]

Of course to you they dont. You wouldn't know what hit you if the rock was the size of your head.

Post a video or article of him saying she would be and that it was imminent. Support your claim.

[Reck]

Post a video or article of him saying she would be and that it was imminent. Support your claim.

TSA suddenly forgot all those times he went on Fox to give his Hillary is going to jail soon sermons.

Not holding your hands through this again. Go back and look for the videos and posts and quotes I posted.

[TSA]

TSA suddenly forgot all those times he went on Fox to give his Hillary is going to jail soon sermons.

Not holding your hands through this again. Go back and look for the videos and posts and quotes I posted.

None of the videos and quotes you posted have him saying she would be indicted and it was imminent. Again, support your claim.

[Reck]

None of the videos and quotes you posted have him saying she would be indicted and it was imminent. Again, support your claim.

Go back to my OP, and try not to contort like you usually do.

[TSA]

Go back to my OP, and try not to contort like you usually do.

If we got back to your OP we are right back to you not understanding the difference between "could and should be indicted" and "will be indicted"

Find me a quote or video of him saying she "will be indicted", you've failed to do so up to this point.