Reply With Quote
He kicked your ass on this debate tbhCommon sense overrides irrelevant stats, tbh. Pretty narrow minded of you, maybe you got to broaden your "world view"
Can only take your dumbass to school on how many topics? We could start with your Raiders.
Trust me little man, NOBODY sees you as being intellectual, ok?
ing idiot.
He kicked your ass on this debate tbhCommon sense overrides irrelevant stats, tbh. Pretty narrow minded of you, maybe you got to broaden your "world view"
What were you reading?
Male cops get called in to handle more potentially violent situations. That pretty much says it all.
I'd ask you to provide some proof but I know you won't so can you explain how it is determined that only a male cop should respond to a particular call. Is it the 911 operator who decides and then put out the call that only males should respond?
Philo as a cop:
Philo: Sir, I'm not saying you need to drop your gun, and I'm not saying you don't. I'm just asking you to say why you wouldn't drop you gun, of if you do drop it, why you would.
Crook: you asshole, I'm not dropping .. you're going to die
Philo: Everyone is eventually going to die
Crook: That's not what I mean, you know it.
Philo: What specifically are you referring to?
Crook: I wasn't saying you are going to die eventually, but right ing now!
Philo: Well hasn't that time passed already? Right now was actually not this "right now" but your "right now" which is now in the past. So what are you saying exactly?
Crook: you, that's what I'm saying.
Philo: So you want to me? Are you sexual? I'm not saying it's wrong or anything, in fact I'd support you on that if supporting you didn't mean I had to take a stance.
Crook: What? No I don't want to you, asshole. I want to kill you but the more you run your mouth I'm thinking ing your mouth might be fun.
Philo: You must have latent sexual tendencies. It's ok though, and I still haven't asked you to drop your gun. In fact, I've not make any claims or requirements, I've only made observations, some in a passive aggressive manner of course.
Crook: this, I give up... take me to jail.
Philo: Do you mean the holding cell?
Crook: ugh...
Ah, the lazy "no stance" shtick in a thread where my stance is clear
Yeah, your stance is crystal clear.Ah, the lazy "no stance" shtick in a thread where my stance is clear
Yes. My stance is that mitch and avante's claims of female cops being more dangerous and trigger happy are full of and statistically unfounded.Yeah, your stance is crystal clear.
Trump: we need to destroy isis
DMC: lol no stance
Trump: my stance is that we need to destroy isis
DMC: again, no clear stance
Your stance: "Their stance is unfounded"
You even avoid saying "wrong". Saying someone hasn't proven their claim isn't the same as having a stance of your own
I don't agree with Mitch or Avante (and I think Mitch is trolling you). However I'd make a counter claim, I'd say it would behoove LE to hire more female cops since testosterone is what drives fight or flight more toward fight, and women have a way of appearing less threatening to a situation that would otherwise appear to be a big male officer against an already cop-paranoid perp. There would be some instances where the female cop would underestimate the situation and get shot, just like males do, and there would be instances where she's taken less seriously because of her gender. I don't think she'd be more likely to fire a weapon than a man would though. I wouldn't use that as a criteria however, since cops need to fire their weapons. It's drawing that's in question.
DMC: I'm flipping a coin. Heads or tails?
me: Heads
DMC: lol not taking a stance
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
