I killed the account because I was wrong.
I'm standing at 0/1
You are standing at 0/8
Is our Priebus gets charged with obstruction of justice bet still on?
If you're tired of laughing at the twitter dumps here's a pretty good read
From Russia, with panic
https://thebaffler.com/salvos/from-r...h-panic-levine
I killed the account because I was wrong.
I'm standing at 0/1
You are standing at 0/8
Is our Priebus gets charged with obstruction of justice bet still on?
So you still don't understand how a FISA warrant works? Seems like you were wrong about Clapper too.
"I said this to myself dontcha see"
Holy Mother of Contradictions:
I wish to pray to you today for a fellow who has been so true to your message...
-Amen
President doesn't need a FISA warrant or go through a court to order surveillance, and Clapper has been called to testify in front of the committee so his knowledge of the case is still obviously relevant. But none of this has anything to do with your continued avoidance of my question.
Is our Priebus gets charged with obstruction of justice bet still on?
Christ almighty you still think a President can order a wiretap?![]()
Clapper hasn't been briefed on anything after January 20th.TSA
If he's so irrelevant you may want to stop linking tweets discussing Clapper being called to testify before the committee.
I know the President can order surveillance without a court order.
50 U.S. Code § 1802 - Electronic surveillance authorization without court order; certification by Attorney General; reports to Congressional committees; transmittal under seal;...of communication common carrier; applications; jurisdiction of court
(a)
(1) Notwithstanding any other law, the President, through the Attorney General, may authorize electronic surveillance without a court order under this subchapter to acquire foreign intelligence information for periods of up to one year if the Attorney General certifies in writing under oath that—
(A) the electronic surveillance is solely directed at—
(i) the acquisition of the contents of communications transmitted by means of communications used exclusively between or among foreign powers, as defined in section 1801(a)(1), (2), or (3) of this le; or
(ii) the acquisition of technical intelligence, other than the spoken communications of individuals, from property or premises under the open and exclusive control of a foreign power, as defined in section 1801(a)(1), (2), or (3) of this le;
(B) there is no substantial likelihood that the surveillance will acquire the contents of any communication to which a United States person is a party; and
(C) the proposed minimization procedures with respect to such surveillance meet the definition of minimization procedures under section 1801(h) of this le; and
if the Attorney General reports such minimization procedures and any changes thereto to the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence at least thirty days prior to their effective date, unless the Attorney General determines immediate action is required and notifies the committees immediately of such minimization procedures and the reason for their becoming effective immediately.
(2) An electronic surveillance authorized by this subsection may be conducted only in accordance with the Attorney General’s certification and the minimization procedures adopted by him. The Attorney General shall assess compliance with such procedures and shall report such assessments to the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence under the provisions of section 1808(a) of this le.
(3) The Attorney General shall immediately transmit under seal to the court established under section 1803(a) of this le a copy of his certification. Such certification shall be maintained under security measures established by the Chief Justice with the concurrence of the Attorney General, in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence, and shall remain sealed unless—
(A) an application for a court order with respect to the surveillance is made under sections 1801(h)(4) and 1804 of this le; or
(B) the certification is necessary to determine the legality of the surveillance under section 1806(f) of this le.
(4) With respect to electronic surveillance authorized by this subsection, the Attorney General may direct a specified communication common carrier to—
(A) furnish all information, facilities, or technical assistance necessary to accomplish the electronic surveillance in such a manner as will protect its secrecy and produce a minimum of interference with the services that such carrier is providing its customers; and
(B) maintain under security procedures approved by the Attorney General and the Director of National Intelligence any records concerning the surveillance or the aid furnished which such carrier wishes to retain.
The Government shall compensate, at the prevailing rate, such carrier for furnishing such aid.
(b) Applications for a court order under this subchapter are authorized if the President has, by written authorization, empowered the Attorney General to approve applications to the court having jurisdiction under section 1803 of this le, and a judge to whom an application is made may, notwithstanding any other law, grant an order, in conformity with section 1805 of this le, approving electronic surveillance of a foreign power or an agent of a foreign power for the purpose of obtaining foreign intelligence information, except that the court shall not have jurisdiction to grant any order approving electronic surveillance directed solely as described in paragraph (1)(A) of subsection (a) unless such surveillance may involve the acquisition of communications of any United States person.
(Pub. L. 95–511, le I, § 102, Oct. 25, 1978, 92 Stat. 1786; Pub. L. 108–458, le I, § 1071(e), Dec. 17, 2004, 118 Stat. 3691; Pub. L. 111–259, le VIII, § 806(a)(2), Oct. 7, 2010, 124 Stat. 2748.)
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/1802
So Trump is not an American now?
The only way the president can order a wiretap without a court order is through his AG and that person has to be foreign born.
TSA not being able to clear this ABC hurdle.
![]()
re repeats exactly what I bolded
TSA daily struggles.![]()
*Watches video, never once heard Obama was spying on Trump.*![]()
"if they found out how we knew what we knew about their … the Trump staff dealing with Russians – that they would try to compromise those sources and methods, meaning we no longer have access to that intelligence.”
Nothing which isn't new or reported on.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/01/u...n-hacking.html"In the Obama administration’s last days, some White House officials scrambled to spread information about Russian efforts to undermine the presidential election — and about possible contacts between associates of President-elect Donald J. Trump and Russians — across the government. Former American officials say they had two aims: to ensure that such meddling isn’t duplicated in future American or European elections, and to leave a clear trail of intelligence for government investigators."
How long were the watergate investigations going on before they started talking impeachment?
Nixon resigned two years after the initial Woodward report dropped in the Post.
I'm going to assume that two months into it, all the conservatives were smugly saying "Ooohhh if something so wrong happened then why hasn't anyone been arrested yet?" and so on.
Ah okay, so this could take a while.
djohn2oo8 your girl Mensch is now gathering intel from known fake twitter accounts
If only Nixon was smart enough to call the post fake news and the enemy of thr American people
It's already been stated that Trump members may have talked to Russians they were surveiling. Probably what she was referring to. You guys are really grasping at straws at this point to try and prove that Trump himself was wiretapped given how many intelligence agencies have outright denied it.
TSA apparently still doesn't know a President cannot order a wiretap.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)