Reply With Quote
Hmmm
Hmmm
the back then was WH and Dems wanted to go public, but McConnell said no.
Obama taking marching orders from McConnell
If you buy that.
Obama was in legacy protection mode. Didn't want to come off as interfering in the elections.
bruh he was campaigning for hillary
Obama was in legacy protection mode. Didn't want to come off as interfering in the elections.
Campaigning and starting a firestorm about muh Russia are two different things. Obama wasn't about to step in it as far as saying BUT Russia!
yeah, but its hard to say he was trying to stay out of the election as he was trying to convince the american people who to vote for
http://crooksandliars.com/2016/12/mi...hed-disclosureObama taking marching orders from McConnell
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...39b23#comments
Judge Nap back on air defending his claim
no evidence, G F Y
He suffers from the same stupid gene as you, it seems.
no evidence, G F Y
If Fox doesn't permanently fire Judge Nap by tomorrow morning he's got something and has revealed it to Fox.
No way they take him off air and then let him back on knowing the first thing he brings up is what got him booted in the first place.
Here's some b/g going back to the early 90s and rise of the Russian oligarchs and mafiya, shows why the FBI would have been snooping Trash Tower since so many Russians are in there, or have passed through there.
BEHIND-THE-SCENES INTERVIEW ON EXCLUSIVE TRUMP-RUSSIA-FBI STORY
http://whowhatwhy.org/2017/03/27/beh...sia-fbi-story/
While Russia and its ex-satellites have been outsmarting, raping America for $Bs and compromising Trash and his ENTIRE ENTOURAGE.
Trash’s Fool On The Hill: Nunes Makes Mockery Of Russia Investigation
Nunes explained:
“Details about U.S. persons associated with the incoming administration, details with little or no apparent foreign intelligence value, were widely disseminated in intelligence community reporting.”The Washington Post noted that, “Nunes’s statements appear to center on surveillance approved by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, a secretive panel that authorizes the interception of communications of known or suspected agents of foreign powers—such as ambassadors—or terrorism suspects.”
In other words,
if Nunes wasn’t making up the whole story, he made an unauthorized disclosure of FISA-derived classified information in violation of the Espionage Act—exactly what he criticized others for doing.
Nunes implicated himself in a possible violation of the law,
destroyed the Republicans’ preferred line of defense, and
implicitly admitted that the administration has no rebuttal to Yates’ testimony.
As Colin Kahl, former national security adviser to Vice President Joe Biden, said on Twitter on Monday, “There are a lot of things we still don’t know about Trump-Russia ties. But there are actually a lot of things we DO know.”
Kahl listed 36 points of fact, none of which Nunes seems prepared to respond to, much less rebut.
In the understatement of the week, thePost’s Aaron Blake said “Nunes isn’t very good at this.”
http://www.nationalmemo.com/trumps-f...ockery-russia/
https://twitter.com/ColinKahl/status/846466154617077760
Last edited by boutons_deux; 03-30-2017 at 05:53 AM.
love how they call the NYT article breaking news when it was reported on march 1
So the take home message from the article is:
"The Agency does… Who's running this thing from Moscow? The FBI just aren't capable on that side, of even understanding what Chris has."
not looking so good... The FBI can't handle it properly.
From January, but still relevant
By the way Smerconish is probably the best show on CNN. Too bad it's on Saturday morning
There are currently 4 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 4 guests)
Posting Permissions