Reply With Quote
there was a great deal of public pressure on obama when he publicly stated he was considering a response to chemical attacks, and it's possible that swayed congress but no way to know for certain.
and apparently the media and the public seem to be far more offended by the manner in which children are killed rather than the fact that they are being killed at all.
there was a great deal of public pressure on obama when he publicly stated he was considering a response to chemical attacks, and it's possible that swayed congress but no way to know for certain.
It sucks. But I get that war is war and sometimes the wrong people get killed. Let's just not pretend that we don't do it as well. Yeah...I'm not sure I'll ever understand how we can have rules on what kind of weapons are used.
we kill future terrorist.
you better get on board.
You think he wants a conflict with Russia?
You think he wants to kill Syrians?
I think he wanted to say no gas. I think that's pretty clear. But one can never be sure when assessing an impulsive hot-head. And as far as what was damaged etc... You need to show more patience than CNN or FOX.
Shillary out there today calling for escalating military action
I can't remember us gassing our own children?
In fact, I don't know the last time the US used gas? WWI?
I guess in the Civil War we killed each other.
We certainly killed a whole lot of German and Japanese kids. Fewer Vietnamese kids...
That makes sense. Ok...you talked me into it.
And to be clear, I'm not advocating not shooting missiles at kids. Just that it's no different than gassing them.
There will be a lot of sabre-rattling and posturing over the next few days. The media will play up the threat to the hilt. Oil prices will rise, and Wall Street will make a quick buck. Lockheed Martin will get itself some more military contracts. The show will end in a "peace" deal involving sanctions on Russia being eased. Exxon Mobil will get access to Arctic oil reserves.
Chump will do a series of rallies on how he negotiated a tremendous deal with Putin. The Trumpsters will eat it up and compare him with Reagan. Then it's back to figuring out how taxes can be cut.
Good point. The world would be a better place if instead of bombs and missiles, we would just fart on everyone and shoot the finger.
Best thing in the world for the Russian and Saudi economies would be for some to go down the Middle East.
The UN seems not to think so.
Apparently getting killed slowly in a tortured manner where your lungs bubble out through your mouth is worse than just merely getting blowed up like Sargent Hulka.
thank you, that was clear.
Link?
Dont be dense though. Trump already escalated this into military action all by his little itty bitty self.
What do you call the airstrike he just ordered? Pizza delivering?
true. at least with him we can be the big toe.
Yeah...I don't know. I guess at the end of the day, those aren't my kids. But if you axed me would I rather be shot in the head or gassed, I'd take the gas because maybe I'd survive it.
Now if you ask me if I'd rather be shot in the pecker or gassed...I'd still rather be gassed in the pecker.
The airbase is nothing more than an abandoned highway now
Highway to the danger zone.
yeah, except for those planes and stuff.
You need to take your position to the UN, they disagree.
But you will have to assign yourself as a country and get a flag.
I would look up how the Vatican pulled this off.
That planes can land on and take off from?
Ugh. There's no way I have time for all of that.
Why would I axe you if I could simply blow you up?
Its common courtesy not to tell congress? It's common courtesy to relay to the enemy to evacuate? And then not even destroy the runway after 60 missles.ing fatass
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions