Reply With Quote
Worrying about the first round.
You don't get to finish if you start like .
Spurs faced only one elimination game that whole run, guess who stepped up with 32 points
http://www.basketball-reference.com/...405040SAS.html
Worrying about the first round.
Comparing the Finals to the first round.
What happens if the Spurs lose that game?Worrying about the first round.
Now you're really reeeeaching. Game 7s don't matter.
Just admit you were wrong about Parker not contributing to the Spurs successes in the past 10 years, and we can move on.
Spurs were gonna win that series with porkers inefficient shooting or not. If it wasn't for Vince Carter, we finish that series in 5.
The only reason that Mavs series went 7 games is largely because Tony sucked in the first 6 games, tbh... some people need to go back and check out the games instead of boxscore reading... he was getting killed by freaking Calderon...
Dude sucked. Like always.
(And I'm not defending Patty either on that series, he sucked too).
We don't even get to a game 7 if not for Manu and Tiago carrying us the first 6 games, and DeJuan Blair getting ejected for kicking Tiago.
"If, would, could."Spurs were gonna win that series with porkers inefficient shooting or not. If it wasn't for Vince Carter, we finish that series in 5.
Who cares? The was a game 7. And Parker killed it.
How was Parker inefficient in that series? I think you got him confused with your boy Patty
Just admit defeat, bro. It's okay.
He was injured too, though... remember he couldn't finish the next series against Portland nor the WCF against OKC...Dude sucked. Like always.
Hey I remember this guy named Bonner man!
That dude could ball!
Lets bring back some of the same playoff memories the BonBon provided!
Tony Parker 34:09 11 19 .579 0 1 .000 10 13 .769 0 4 4 4 0 0 3 1 32 +13 Danny Green 32:09 5 7 .714 4 6 .667 2 2 1.000 0 3 3 1 1 1 0 4 16 +21 Tim Duncan 30:58 7 8 .875 0 0 1 2 .500 3 5 8 1 0 2 2 2 15 +23 Kawhi Leonard 29:14 7 14 .500 1 5 .200 0 1 .000 1 5 6 1 0 0 0 2 15 +15 Tiago Splitter 15:15 0 0 0 0 1 2 .500 1 1 2 0 1 1 0 4 1 +15 Reserves MP FG FGA FG% 3P 3PA 3P% FT FTA FT% ORB DRB TRB AST STL BLK TOV PF PTS +/- Boris Diaw 26:35 3 5 .600 0 1 .000 2 2 1.000 1 6 7 5 1 0 1 3 8 +16 Manu Ginobili 23:35 5 7 .714 2 3 .667 8 9 .889 0 3 3 5 6 0 3 2 20 +32 Patty Mills 17:04 2 8 .250 2 6 .333 1 2 .500 0 3 3 2 1 0 0 3 7 +17 Marco Belinelli 9:46 2 4 .500 1 2 .500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 -11
Thank god.
Tony was 9-16 for 21 points in Game 1 for a +20 box. Jose Calderon was a huge 3-9 for 7 points.
Game 2: Tony, 10 points 5-10, Calderon 5-10, 12 points. Lost the battle.
Game 3: Tony 19 points on 50%, Calderon 16 points on 70%. Adv: Calderon. Let's not forget the Client had 12 points on 4-14 shooting in a one point loss.
Game 4. Parker was definitely subpar. 10 points on 5-15. No debate here.
Game 5. 23 points on 9-23 shooting. Calderon a big 8 points on 3-9 shooting. Tony won the battle. Let's not forget Vince Carter's 28 points on 10-16 shooting off the bench. Guess who woulda been guarding Carter a lot? Client
Game 6. 22 points on 10-23 shooting with 5TOs. No debate Tony was a detriment that game.
Game 7. Clutch as a mother er.
So no, he didn't "suck" in the first 6 games.
I would say Tony had a typical series for a fringe level all-star player, which he was at that point.
WTF. How does a guy like that even make an NBA roster smh.
Watch the games. Porker was trash.
Dude always stat pads in blowouts good though.
So Patty was better than Kawhi too that game.
Tony Parker 34:09 11 19 .579 0 1 .000 10 13 .769 0 4 4 4 0 0 3 1 32 +13 Danny Green 32:09 5 7 .714 4 6 .667 2 2 1.000 0 3 3 1 1 1 0 4 16 +21 Tim Duncan 30:58 7 8 .875 0 0 1 2 .500 3 5 8 1 0 2 2 2 15 +23 Kawhi Leonard 29:14 7 14 .500 1 5 .200 0 1 .000 1 5 6 1 0 0 0 2 15 +15 Tiago Splitter 15:15 0 0 0 0 1 2 .500 1 1 2 0 1 1 0 4 1 +15 Reserves MP FG FGA FG% 3P 3PA 3P% FT FTA FT% ORB DRB TRB AST STL BLK TOV PF PTS +/- Boris Diaw 26:35 3 5 .600 0 1 .000 2 2 1.000 1 6 7 5 1 0 1 3 8 +16 Manu Ginobili 23:35 5 7 .714 2 3 .667 8 9 .889 0 3 3 5 6 0 3 2 20 +32 Patty Mills 17:04 2 8 .250 2 6 .333 1 2 .500 0 3 3 2 1 0 0 3 7 +17 Marco Belinelli 9:46 2 4 .500 1 2 .500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 -11
Sure thing
Patty was the one who came in up 30 and hit a 3 to go from 1-7 to 2-8Watch the games. Porker was trash.
Dude always stat pads in blowouts good though.
And
I'm gonna let you pump the whole forbes thing dude. I'm done.So Patty was better than Kawhi too that game.
Sure thing
Of course you areI'm gonna let you pump the whole forbes thing dude. I'm done.
Murray and Forbes >> Paying Patty 40-50 mil.
Bye Patty, I wont miss your D. Thanks for the shots thst we probablydidnt need vs the Heat
You're turning into a got now dude.
Make yourself look like an even bigger dumbass. It's your rep.
He was confusing the 2014 playoffs with the 2010 playoffs.Tony was 9-16 for 21 points in Game 1 for a +20 box. Jose Calderon was a huge 3-9 for 7 points.
Game 2: Tony, 10 points 5-10, Calderon 5-10, 12 points. Lost the battle.
Game 3: Tony 19 points on 50%, Calderon 16 points on 70%. Adv: Calderon. Let's not forget the Client had 12 points on 4-14 shooting in a one point loss.
Game 4. Parker was definitely subpar. 10 points on 5-15. No debate here.
Game 5. 23 points on 9-23 shooting. Calderon a big 8 points on 3-9 shooting. Tony won the battle. Let's not forget Vince Carter's 28 points on 10-16 shooting off the bench. Guess who woulda been guarding Carter a lot? Client
Game 6. 22 points on 10-23 shooting with 5TOs. No debate Tony was a detriment that game.
Game 7. Clutch as a mother er.
So no, he didn't "suck" in the first 6 games.
I would say Tony had a typical series for a fringe level all-star player, which he was at that point.
[QUOTE=dabom;8959448]Make yourself look like an even bigger dumbass.
Im glad. ��
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
