Reply With Quote
It's a wash. Both are great players but neither are winners.
Who would you take right now if you started a team? These are your only choices, so dont say Curry s.
It's a wash. Both are great players but neither are winners.
Chris hasnt played with a completely healthy team, so that kinda sucks. Blake is always banged up come playoffs. But!!!! CP3 didnt show up at all yesterday. 13pts in 40 minutes?
Both are chokers that blow 3-1 leads, but at least Westbrook didn't do it against ing Josh Smith.
Westbrook, easily. He wouldn't have gone out like a punk in the fashion that Choke-P did yesterday.
lol he did. He went out sooner.
Hard choice. At the same age it's easily Paul but right now I'd have to go Westbrook, you can get another 6-8 good years out of him while Paul is already 32.
Did CP3 try? At least WB puts out effort.
He did it against Klay Thompson.
Keep running with that fallacy, homie. We've already seen the results.Did CP3 try? At least WB puts out effort.
We already know you are a Westbrook hater. No matter what he does in a positive way you wont like him. Its cool Homie.
are we still talking about it? Come on guys, let's just stop with the cp3 is a great player talk forever, shall we? He's a good player, great ball handler, passer and pretty good teammate, but he's a loser compared to his compe ion. Westchip is a legitimate star. Has his flaws, but he doesn't have the dantoni stigma like paul does. Paul will never win anything, unless he goes the david lee way.
they have 1 thing in common, both are wankers
You're talking out of your buttcheeks. Nothing you said made any sense. Whatever the "Dantoni stigma" is how can you say Paul has it but Westbrook doesn't? Westbrook hasn't done either as the lead guy.
He had a far worse team around him. And he still never disappeared like Choke-P just did in a home game 7.
paul easily
lol Westbrook took 91 more shots than the next teammate in a 5 game series. How the do you take 152 shots in 5 games?
He wasn't given the chance.
the dantoni stigma is a known basketball condition where you manage to always lose in the end. It is a sense of security a person emanates, as in you just know, no matter how much it looks good at certain points, when it matters he's not going to deliver. Westchimp has been in a final.
CP3 has had the misfortune of playing for black coaches almost his entire career.
I would agree.
OP is a knucklehead, but I think this is actually a pretty good question. If you're trying to win a le, I'd go with CP3. I think you would still need someone to take over in the clutch (which Blake Griffin has proven he can't do) but with the right combination I think it could be done.
The only way I'd take Westbrook over Paul is if I have a bad team and I want the best chance of winning one game as I can get. Westbrook can put together a MJ-esque game and beat almost anybody with a team of scrubs which Paul isn't really capable of doing since he's too unselfish. Problem is that he won't do it consistently and we've already seen that he's abrasive when paired with another superstar player. I think there's a limit to how far you can go with Westbrook and there will be too many games where he does more harm than good. Unless he has Lebron James on his team, he seems destined to fail.
Either way, nice to see lebomb post a thought provoking thread. Definitely an improvement over talking about licking people's buttholes
This, tbh
Paul
STFU!!! I only tongue my wife's asshole. Not people clown. Also, once you have sex (with a girl).... your homies don't count. Come back and I will show you how to please her.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
