Reply With Quote
TLDR.
Summary?
RandomGuy I thought you'd find this very interesting as you seem to be convinced it was Russia who was responsible for the hacking, even after being shown how highly flawed the lol CrowdStrike report was.
I'll post the summary here but it's important to go to the actual site so you can follow all of the links/evidence.
http://g-2.space/
Guccifer 2.0: Game Over
Metadata suggests it took only 30 minutes to go from a DNC tech/data strategy consultant creating do ents to Guccifer2.0 tainting them - all occurring on a date that Guccifer2.0 claimed to be after he was locked out of the DNC Network - occurring on the same day that Guccifer2.0 emerged.
Data found deeper in files now also demonstrates there was a misdirection effort, that, in its larger scope - seems to have been intended to discredit leaks by having leaks blamed on Russian hackers
LATEST: An extremely rare pair of meetings has been discovered solely by following where Flood would likely have installed MS-Word (he worked for Biden at the White House for a year) and checking Biden's visitors on the 15th of June around 1:38pm. - Considering the attendees potential motives to frame Russia in both meetings, this is either a phenomenal coincidence or Guccifer 2.0's first batch of files came from the White House.
INTRODUCTION
There are individuals, who, in reality, have a higher likelihood of being linked to Guccifer2.0 than anyone in Russia. - The intention of this article is to inform readers, extensively about everything there is to know about Guccifer2.0 and from that, be armed with enough information to give motive and means the regard they deserve.
To understand who Guccifer2.0 is likely to be - it is imperative to understand WHAT Guccifer2.0 is. - What did he do? - What did he say? - Are his claims now confirmed, debunked or yet to be verified? - What were the results of his actions? - What do any lies told and the likelihood of them being debunked or remaining secret really imply about his intent? - Was there anything misreported or omitted that may have been relevant?
The answers to the above questions will probably be surprising to many considering what the USIC, CyberSecurity researchers and the MSM have repeatedly insisted over and over again.
The first step is to catalog events - and then, retrospectively review the data.
CONTENTS
1. Timeline - What Happened & When Did It Happen
2. Guccifer2.0's Claims Debunked & Discredited
3. 3rd Party Assessments - Assumptions & Conjecture vs Evidence & Facts
4. Actions, Consequences & Convenience For Anti-Leak Narratives
5. Rushing To Be Russian - The Donkey In A Bear Costume Made A Mistake
6. Language & Text Analysis
7. Recognizing Intent From Deceptions
8. With Motive & Means - Those More Likely Linked to G2 than Russians
9. Updates & Inquiries With Third Parties
10. 3rd Party Research & Further Reading
11. Frequently Asked Questions
(8) With Motive & Means - Those More Likely Linked to G2 than Russians
It seems like there's a good chance Warren Flood has involvement to some degree but even if that's true - he personally had nothing to lose due to the emails, so, who would really be behind such a scheme?
The more thought I've given it, it seems most probable that one particular group would have been particularly desperate precisely at that time, for the emergence of a narrative about Russian hackers to discredit proper leaks / justify claims that all leaks are 'probably doctored' and they will have very likely known Flood too.
That group is the Clinton Campaign.
As of June 12th, they were in a position where Julian Assange had just announced WikiLeaks' upcoming release of Hillary's emails, she was still under FBI investigation, Trump was attacking Hillary for her use of a private server with his supporters frequently chanting "lock her up!" at rallies).
The campaign was in a desperate position and really needed something similar to a Russian hacker narrative and one where they would be fortunate to have a seemingly clumsy hacker that leaves lots of 'fingerprints' tainting files and bringing the reputation of leaks into question... Sure enough, 2-3 days later, Guccifer2.0 - the world's weirdest hacker - was spawned and started telling lies in an effort to attribute himself to the malware discoveries, etc.
================================================== ===============================
Also...I posted this tweet from Anonymous Scandanavia yesterday thinking it was more pedo related since it focused on Biden being creepy with the children, but it seems to be directly tied to this article and the Ukranians that were visiting Biden in the White House during the time of the server breach and Warren Flood (Biden's technology director)
Details in link
http://g-2.space/jb/
White House Meetings on Ukraine Coincide With Time of Russian Fingerprint Fabrications - Pursuing Guccifer2.0's 'Warren Flood' Connections
By Adam Carter --- April 29th, 2017
In my research to investigate the real iden y of Guccifer 2.0, I discovered that the name Warren Flood applied to more do ents than had originally been reported and highlighted the unusual nature of those do ents both in terms of the metadata and the RSIDs (and Russian Stylesheet that existed in multiple do ents even before the content in each do ent did) and explained that this demonstrates an effort to try to discredit Wikileaks by blaming leaks on Russian hackers.
Considering where copies of Microsoft Word installed by Flood (highlighted in the photo above with Biden) might exist besides on computers he owns, I considered his past role as Sen. Joe Biden's Technology Director (as noted on his Linked-In profile) and thought one place to look for interesting activity would be computers residing in Biden's office or generally at the White House.
So, I wondered who may have visited Biden that day around that time. I thought I'd check out visits to the White House hosted by Biden, wondering whether there'd be any interesting activity anywhere near 1:38pm on June 15th 2016.
It turns out that Biden was hosting visits from a number of Ukrainians around that time, on that date. To see how frequent this sort of activity occurred I checked the whole of June. - It seems such visits were not a regular occurance.
(Times below are appointment times, some individuals turned up before their 2pm appointment)
An attempt to quickly identify visitors in June showed the folllowing had a Ukraine connection:
While this doesn't prove anything, it certainly is a curious coincidence to stumble upon while looking for activity of people that might have had a motive (or helped with an effort) to frame Russia.
US visitors that day also have ties back to events surrounding the Ukrainian 2014 revolution and/or reporting on it (with the exception of Kuklish who is an English-Ukrainian translator).
I'm not going to get into speculation. I've let journalists who have written extensively on the Ukraine coup know about this and will leave this up to them to pursue, if they wish to.
UPDATE: A closer look at the actual booking/arrival times, room numbers, other visits, etc. shows that, on the 15th, there were effectively 2 meetings. One of which had at least 18 individuals attending (Stoliarchuk is listed at 1:30pm and 2:00pm) and another with at least 4 attending.
TLDR.
Summary?
Have to plead a bit of eyestrain here. My old ass is in need of reading glasses, sorry, my eyes are watering and blurry.
Hack/breach sloppily made to look like Russians
Most likely Ukranians responsible
The links give way more detail. Trying to copy/paste did not format well and left links cold.
I feel your pain.
Putting this together with the news that CrowdStrike had to rewrite their original Russia report (FBI based their conclusion off original report because DNC wouldn't allow them in their server) twice now because of errors really takes a fat on the Russian hacking narrative that has been pushed.
Game over: Take 100.
Boom
Millions of tax dollars wasted having FBI/CIA/DOJ/Congress investigating Russia and one guy named Adam Carter figures it all out and is able to link it back to Democrats/Ukrainians trying to frame Russia to discredit the leaks about to drop from Wikileaks.
Ballsy plan by the Democrats, poorly executed from the start. CrowdStrike report blew up on them as well after several revisions and it's founder being linked to Clinton.
"The firm’s CTO and co-founder, Dmitri Alperovitch, is a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council, a think tank with openly anti-Russian sentiments that is funded by Ukrainian billionaire Victor Pinchuk, who also happened to donate at least $10 million to the Clinton Foundation."
Game over
Whatever happened to vault7?
part 3 released a few days ago. Simple Google.
TSA must contact the US govt, or RNC, immediately with this astonishing discovery
CROFL. Comey implied Stone was invloved with Guccifer. TSA losing again.
Stone himself admitted to messaging Guccifer
...
Hey, did you not read this thread? GAME OVER!Stone himself admitted to messaging Guccifer
With the knowledge you've just acquired in this thread, why would it matter Stone was communicating online through social media with "Guccifer"?
Try and articulate a point and not resort to a tweet or emoji.
Whoever this Adam Carter guy is he figured it out and presents a compelling case, much more so than any the Dems have thrown at the wall. To think the IC doesn't now know what's going on now is just complete ignorance. Question now is whether or not those involved are held to the fire.
This thread will be the an hesis of djohn2oo8's Flynn thread.
This thread will deliver.
Game over.
Shocking that something online that would clear the Russians has appeared. I'm sure that faking evidence online is completely not within the Russian intelligence capabilities or interests.
Was the guy writing the webpage in the same country as Guccifer?
Last edited by RandomGuy; 05-04-2017 at 09:05 AM.
Make you a deal. You read through the dossier, and I will read this. Quid pro quo.
Last edited by RandomGuy; 05-04-2017 at 08:59 AM.
Last edited by RandomGuy; 05-04-2017 at 09:04 AM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
