Reply With Quote
half of them actually believe she did fire comey based on news reports recently released by russian bloggers and infowars
what a re ed bunch
This could get interesting.
half of them actually believe she did fire comey based on news reports recently released by russian bloggers and infowars
what a re ed bunch
Sit down TSA
lol question dodging. not surprised the re who believes he reads on 4chan is fact cant legitimately provide an answer to anythingBleeding out of your asses while playing the what if Hillary was President game
More bad news djohn
"Congressional officials were told by FBI Director James Comey before he was fired that there are just a small number of Americans who are targets of the criminal or counterintelligence probes involving Russia and that none were President Trump or his top aides, Circa has confirmed."
"The sources spoke as Sen. Charles Grassley (R-IA) took the extraordinary step of going to the Senate Judiciary open hearing Thursday to say that he had been provided no evidence to date in classified briefings that Trump was a target.
"Shortly after Director Comey briefed us, I tweeted that he should be transparent. I said he should tell the public what he told Senator Feinstein and me about whether the FBI is or is not investigating the President," said Grassley.
"On Tuesday, the President’s letter said that Director Comey told him he was not under investigation. Senator Feinstein and I heard nothing that contradicted the President’s statement."
His statement was backed up by his Democratic counterpart on the Senate Judiciary Committee, Dianne Feinstein (D- CA).
http://circa.com/politics/accountabi...n-probe-target
more bad news djohn
"Rogers, whose firm has previously worked with campaign committees for Maryland House of Delegates and Senate candidates, said the FBI investigation concerns work the firm performed during the 2013 Virginia gubernatorial campaign of former Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli, a Republican."
"According to Rogers, his firm settled a civil suit brought by the Cuccinelli campaign after he lost the 2013 Virginia governor's race to Democrat Terry McAuliffe. Rogers said the investigation appears to stem from allegations brought in that suit."
http://www.capitalgazette.com/news/f...511-story.html
I think the reason why Comey was fired is in this video. Trump knows he is not the subject of FBI investigation, but Comey refused to confirm that in his testimony.
fierce coordination lolol
Feinstein sadly agreeing with Grassley
TSA can a President wiretap?
Experts: Trump's Alleged Conversations With Comey Improper
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politi...comey-improperPresident Donald Trump's statement that he discussed the FBI's Russia investigation with former Director James Comey has raised red flags among legal experts who said such conversations would be improper.
"There generally shouldn't be communications about pending investigations and if you need an explanation why, see: Watergate, basically," said Kathleen Clark, an ethics expert at Washington University's School of Law.
Former federal prosecutors and government ethics experts said the president and FBI director should never discuss pending investigations, at least in the way Trump described it in an exclusive interview Thursday with NBC News' Lester Holt.
While there are many unanswered questions about what actually transpired between Trump and Comey, experts said the alleged conversations raise the issue of potential intimidation and conflicts of interest that those very rules are designed to prevent.
"There should be a structural respect between the Department of Justice and the White House and a measure of propriety so that nobody ever has the conversation we're seeing," said Michael Wildes, a former federal prosecutor.
How would Trump know that? Because he was trying to strongarm the FBI director? Would the FBI director even be able to talk to the target of a potential investigation to tell him, even if he knew?
Seriously?
Dumber and dumber
As had been stated publicly many times the FBI made clear it does not yet have proof of any criminal collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia or any proof voting ballots were changed. These probes can go on for a long time and things can change, but right now that is what is the state (of things)," said a source.
1. What was the nature of current and former associates of Donald Trump with Russia?
Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Ca.), the top Democrat on House Intelligence Committee, says there's evidence that former Trump associates -- Paul Manafort, a former campaign manager, ex-National Security Adviser Michael Flynn, former policy adviser Carter Page and longtime friend Roger Stone -- had contacts with Russian sources.
4 of 20
All four men have denied any wrongdoing, but Schiff said this week there is "more than cir stantial" evidence that Trump team members might have given implicit approval to Russian contacts about the releasing of damaging Hillary Clinton. Other intelligence sources, including those interviewed by Circa, say the evidence is too uncertain at present to draw any conclusions from it and that much more work needs to be done.
5 of 20
But all sides agreed these questions need to be answered with far more certainty. Some of the unanswered questions include the exact nature of any contacts and whether any Trump associates even knew they were talking to Russian intelligence actors, who could have been posing as news organizations, hackers, businessmen or other covers.
2. Did the Obama administration improperly unmask and read accidental National Security Agency intercepts of Americans, including Trump associates?
House Intelligence Committee chairman Devin Nunes, R-Ca., says he has evidence that NSA Section 702 intercepts of Americans talking to foreigners were being read inside the Obama administration, sometimes with the iden ies of Americans unmasked.
7 of 20
Nunes says some of those intercepts involved Trump transition figures after the November elections. The unmasking of American intercepts is supposed to be a rare event to further national security interests. If there was a sudden e last year, Nunes' committee will have to determine whether there were justifiable reasons or whether it was an illegal political espionage effort on behalf of an outgoing administration seeking to monitor its replacement.
3. Were journalists or organizations posing as journalism ins utions used by Russia to carry out its counterintelligence missions of disrupting the U.S. election?
In highly classified briefings, U.S. intelligence officials have identified several websites and social media accounts of westerners that were used to spread fake news damaging to Hillary Clinton or to disseminate hacked do ents.
Some of the websites were treated as legitimate sources of news during the 2016 election. While much more work must be done to determine if the operators of these sites were complicit players with Russia or just dupes, lawmakers in both parties have keen interest in pursuing this line of inquiry.
http://circa.com/politics/government...eeds-to-answer
, I gotta get back to other . Read the rest of it there. Good questions all.
Should have just linked the opening paragraph
"While the FBI, to date, has not found any evidence of criminal collusion between Donald Trump's campaign and Russia, the counterintelligence probe into Moscow's effort to hijack the 2016 election still has a long way to go to answer questions essential to repelling future disruptions of American democracy."
I kid. Looks like a decent read
this was almost slick trolling
Pence neck deep in this too. Ryan scared less. Plenty of GOP with money laundering ties.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
