Reply With Quote
what an ignorant dumb phuck.
Andrew Lynch @ Fox
http://www.foxsports.com/nba/gallery...layoffs-051217
Can you believe this Bich Nga?
Andrew Lynch @ Fox
Right...and what about all the games GS won without MVP Curry? GTFOH with that bull .
More likely proves Harden wasn't.
And that's not true, either.
Where does Fox Sports get these guys? He probably has Matt Moore's redheadpubes all over his face
LOL. Ok, so if this proved Kawhi was not an MVP, what does that say about Harden that he no showed? And If Harden is not an MVP, then what does that say about Russ being knocked by Harden?
Just utter stupidity.
JVG is right again! He called this out last, he mentioned something about idiot writers will come up and say something " Spurs are better without Kahwi" or something like it..
How many people read the article? I mean, it wasn't great journalism, but it's not hating on Kawhi really. It essentially says the Spurs haven't been able to integrate his offense into the "beautiful game", and that Tim establishing the Spurs' culture enabled them to beat the Rockets short-handed.
I don't think this game demonstrated anything beyond the fans who thought the team was terrible outside Kawhi had bad takes. Anyone with half a brain should have been able to see that no one-man team would be this good. However, since when did being on a one-man, mediocre team count for more than being the best player and leader of a solid team with elite aspects? This MVP race has really hurt the credibility of the award, in my opinion.
I read it and stand by my comments. Spurs individually are not overly talented. They are well built defensively but on an individual basis with TP/LMA/Danny struggling the majority of the year on offense they aren't some world beater talent team. My issue is why now for this article? Taking a 1.25 game sample size and saying "definitive!" Is beyond ridiculous.
It proved Harden not MVP. Beard choked hard core.
Oddly enough, the postseason has proved Kawhi a better MVP option than any of Westbrook or Harden.
I just can't stand Westbrook's game. So hectic. So self-defeating too often.
Lol. Please just shut the up. You have some of the most idiotic takes I've ever seen. You don't believe this stupid that you type, you're just trying to be "edgy" and different, it's pathetic.
If Harden and Kawhi aren't mvp, russ can't be. Forcing an entire nba roster to depend 100% on you for everything on the court, including rebounds, is the opposite of valuable. It's the definition of cancer.
That team was Uber talented, even after KD left. They just paid 3 big men 160 million over the next three seasons but apparently none of them are even good enough to rebound - or so the narrative goes when you're trying to justify a point guard getting 80% of his boards uncontested.
Maybe Kawhi is the mvp precisely because his teammates have developed so well under his leadership? Because despite his PPG and usage rate other players are still getting the chance to shine through the season, even when he's in the game. Kawhi isn't trying to be bigger than the team, and that's why the Spurs are one of the last four teams standing.
If I could vote right now, by my own definition of MVP, I'd have to bite my lip and hand it to LayBruhn. Durant can't get it because he's a punk and got hurt a good chunk of the season, Westbrook can't because his 4th quarter playoff shooting and scoring. Kawhi choked against GSW regular season, seemed to be well on his way to choking against HOU before getting hurt. Harden showed choke tendencies all season, punctuated by last night. Kaang is the only dude that been putting up the numbers, and shining even moreso in the playoffs.
I'd give it to LeBron and be cool with it.
Agreed. LeBron is the logical choice tbh. But Westbrook will get it due to his hero ball, yet team-defeating, stats
you man. You keep trying to come in here with hot takes then get down on your knees to suck off dudes like Green and LMA when your takes get shown to be . This stupid-ass shtick of "the Spurs outside Kawhi suck" has been proven to be false time and again. Get over it.
The Spurs are a good if not great team without Kawhi. They are a championship-caliber team with him. Why that can't make you happy is beyond me.
This is another typical backhanded compliment for the Spurs. Every year they find away to credit the spurs by discrediting them.
Why is Curry an MVP then? Why Durant?
It's just stupid.
They are a great team with Kawhi? Based on what?
Based on the their talent, record and performance.
(I'm assuming you meant "great team without Kawhi", because we all know they are great with him.)
They are good enough to compete without him but they not great.
The Bulls won consecutive 50+ win games without Jordan and reached the Semis without him. 94-95
Chinook is just a dumbass.
Because you're fukin stupid if you believe that. This team would have 40 wins at best without Kawhi.
Yes, and no one's ever said the Bulls outside Jordan were garbage.
Eh, that's just semantics. They'd have a top7-10 record without him and make the playoffs. Portland is warmed over, and they made it easily this year.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
