Reply With Quote
I've already admitted the WaPo/CIA cooked this one up perfectly as no one can actually prove the anonymous source right or wrong.
mccabe didn't shoot it down. he said he believes it's adequately funded and doesn't need more funding. but that doesn't in itself mean comey didnt want more resources
thats like saying just because Trump thinks the EPA doesnt need more funding, then that's proof that obama never thought it needed more funding
I've already admitted the WaPo/CIA cooked this one up perfectly as no one can actually prove the anonymous source right or wrong.
How many Dems have said Comey went to congress and asked for more resources?
So why do you say the story is not true if there is no way to prove it? Just like I said, spinning for the administration. Your mouth, the official holster for Donald on ST.
remember when you were saying Kasich was you man
Feinstein said that while she hadn't herself heard the request she was aware of it. Not sure if she is referring to the reports to how she became "aware" of it, or if she has independent knowledge. I'm pretty sure Comey has agreed to testify before the intelligence committee, and it should happen sooner or later. This report no doubt will come up, we might as well wait until then before crying "fake newz".
McMaster and Tillerson both said the WaPo story was false. Until more comes out it's their word vs anonymous WaPo source and WaPo clearly has an agenda against Trump.So why do you say the story is not true if there is no way to prove it? Just like I said, spinning for the administration. Your mouth, the official holster for Donald on ST.
remember when you were saying Kasich was you man
Who do you believe, McMaster/Tillerson or anonymous WaPo source?
do tillerson and mcmaster have an agenda in support of trump?
This place would be boring as if we all waited for facts to come out and never speculated.
I'm sure you had the same benefit of the doubt for Susan Rice or Hillary making statements defending Obama.
You couldn't have chosen two worse examples
‘Don’t ask me about how this looks’: White House staffers hide from press after Russia bombs
According to four Daily Beast reporters, the White House dissolved into chaos after the news broke.
Senior staff we reportedly “hiding in their offices” after the story broke.
“Three senior administration staffers expressed bewilderment and frustration at news that Trump apparently shared highly classified information about ISIS threats against the U.S. homeland with Russia’s foreign minister and ambassador to Washington last week” the Beast reports.
“Do not ask me about how this looks, we all know how this looks,” a senior aide told The Daily Beast. The same aide described the scene as like, “a morgue” at the White House.
“At this point I’m wondering if we’ll ever be able to stop talking about Russia,” a White House staffer told The Daily Beast.
“It’s totally self-inflicted. Every time I feel like we’re getting a handle on the last Russia fiasco, a new one pops.”
The White House press corps on Monday overheard screaming between White House press secretary Sean er, chief White House counsel Steve Bannon, deputy White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders and White House Communications Director Michale Dubke. The shouting was loud enough, staffers blasted the volume on TVs to try and drown out the back-and-forth.
http://www.rawstory.com/2017/05/dont...e+Raw+Story%29
And the Repug Congress is fully implicated as they REFUSE to impeach Trash, continue to enable his insanity.
A never-ending STORM
speculation is fine. claiming something to be fact when you don't know is just dumb. especially when the guy is set to testify publicly when he can clarify this all himself
Well of course you think that.You couldn't have chosen two worse examples
THREE RUSSIAN SPIES MEET IN THE OVAL OFFICE
WASHINGTON (The Borowitz Report)—Three men alleged to be prominent Russian spies inexplicably gained access to the Oval Office last week and held a high-level meeting there, according to reports.
Eyewitnesses to the meeting said that the three Russian agents spoke at length and shared sensitive intelligence material, at times laughing uproariously.
After approximately an hour,
the meeting broke up, with two of the spies leaving the Oval Office and the third remaining behind.
News that agents of the Russian Federation had somehow eluded the Secret Service in order to hold a meeting in the Oval Office sent shock waves through Washington on Monday evening.
“The fact that three well-known Russian agents were able to hold a meeting in the Oval Office suggests that something has seriously broken down,” Harland Dorrinson, a national-security official who served in the Reagan and Bush Administrations, said.
“None of these three men should be anywhere near the White House.”
On Capitol Hill, House Speaker Paul Ryan called the meeting of the three Russian spies at the White House
“a tempest in a teapot” and “much ado about nothing,” before adding, off-microphone, “I am screwed. I am so screwed.”
http://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report/three-russian-spies-meet-in-the-oval-office?intcid=mod-latest
Seriously don't think you could have picked worse
Seriously of course you think that
Battle of unnamed sources begins
I couldn't think of a president less deserving of the benefit of the doubt.
But his NS Adviser and SOS issued carefully worded, short statements so I guess they're right ...
LOL using up all his political capital on crowd size at the inauguration.
He apparently dropping code-word level classified information to the Russi
So now the anonymous sources who didn't have security clearances also know code word level classificationsHe apparently dropping code-word level classified information to the Russi
His name was Seth Rich
is this the guy hillary capped?
Don't play stupid TSA.
The contents of the meetings were read by some National Security people who claim Trump gave enough indirect information for the Russians to figure out the source. The aforementioned has not been denied by anyone.
YET AGAIN Trump is having problems with our intelligence community and is relying on his appointees to dance around the issue.
Anonymous sources lack credibility except when they push the narrative you want to believe. Or come from /pol/So now the anonymous sources who didn't have security clearances also know code word level classifications
There are currently 27 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 27 guests)
Posting Permissions
