Damn that's true. Those last two steps are so unnatural that Zaza didn't even have enough time to plant. ing piece of . I don't even think an unlikely series win would be satisfying enough at this point. I want blood for this , tbh.
I've been seen these on reddit all day, of course the warriors fanbase upvote system pretty much makes them feel like they are right(since they are the majority).
Pau and LMA take 2 steps after the first bounce. zaza takes 2 steps after the first bounce then another "extra" 2. And Kawhi is fading away and curry is never fading away. Clearly they are not even in the same stratosphere but these goldenstate cucks will say it otherwise.![]()
Damn that's true. Those last two steps are so unnatural that Zaza didn't even have enough time to plant. ing piece of . I don't even think an unlikely series win would be satisfying enough at this point. I want blood for this , tbh.
Sheezus Brown is being a kuunt about this.
This. One of the idiot ex players was trying to point to Zaza Gabors acting job as proof he was innocent.
Phucks sake do a bunch of these ex players have gambling degeneracy and money on Golden State? I mean really.
They're a ing joke brah. They're even accusing Manu of trying to injure Raymond and Durbeta:
Manu takes a step in to swipe down at Raymond and they claim he's trying to undercut him
They're basically dissecting the game looking for any Spurs plays that they can spin as dirty. I really hope we give them their wish and take one of their gots out so they can actually have a legit comparison to what Zaza did.
It's a fact that Pachulia is a dirty player, so he doesn't get the benefit of the doubt. It's pretty clear to me that it was an intentionally reckless play, and it paid off for him and the Warriors. If karma is real, watch out.
http://ftw.usatoday.com/2017/05/greg...ty-player-foul
Pop defended Bowen exactly what Zaza did 11 years ago. But the fact is, it's a different league now. He would have worked in collaboration with the league to outlaw this sort of thing, particularly in the past 5 years. Back then every team had dirty players - Bowen, James Posey, Raja Bell, Nocioni, Najera, even Chris Paul & Matt Barnes were repeat offenders back in the day. And that was just in the 2000s. That doesn't mean any people of coached those players aren't allowed to have an opinion on what is dirty play in 2017.
I liked how Pop compared the Spurs' chances after losing Kawhi to GS's if they'd happen to lose Curry. A bit of a shot at Durant![]()
There is no comparison. Its the extra steps zaza takes once kawai is in the air that makes it dangerous.
You know you're in the wrong when you bring up that happened 10 years ago to try and justify what happened a couple of days ago.![]()
Pop has always taken full advantage of the rules, the league not taking action was the problem back then, not Pop.
This has parallels to NFL players headhunting receivers. 10-15 years ago we might have said "oh good tough play". Nowadays it borders on assault given concussion fears. Yes, I understand ankles and heads are two very different things, though it's not like Zaza isn't playing recklessly out there and potentially causing injuries outside of stepping under shooters.
What about that moving pick on Patty that opened up a three? That matters in a two point game.
The difference is being a dirty player means you're always doing dirty stuff. If you seldom do a dirty play then I don't know if that's fair to call you a dirty player. Of course I don't think that applies to Zaza. Someone said he has one of the highest flagrant foul counts.
Anthony and forbes are trash, time to use our trash to rough up their fine china
at the bowen apologism
poop is a hypocrite. this is nothing new
Among active players Zaza is number 1 in flagrant fouls. It's very obvious he is a dirty player. This is like being scared to call a Ho a Ho when it's do ented that she's slept around with a ton of dudes. Anybody who can't call Zaza dirty is a joke to me.
All the talk about it being "dirty", or about Pachulia having a history was a mistake. It's illegal as . Pop should have just stood on that. Instead, he opened the door for all the smoke and mirrors of whether Pachulia is really a dirty player.
Could be. IMO for better or worse, Pop was standing publicly for his team. He obviously talked to them privately, just wanted to let them know that he got their back publicly too. Maybe for some confidence boost. That's what I think.
+ 1. Man U had me rolling when I read this and yeah your right he is a Ho and always has been
Agree. Pop can defend whatever he says to anyone. Nobody has the guts to question him to his face.
Bad analogy tbh. Being a Ho (she or he) is not a bad thing. We are a very sexual species. Quit the stigma.
Skip called Pop out on national TV:
It actually came off to me the same way.
Who cares about the stirring sucking media anyway?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)