Nope.
Drudge, Fox, and Breitbart are all party to the "MSM" propaganda giving them a commonality. They are all hyperpartisan: Bannon is chief advisor to Trump, Fox News was founded by the GOP, Drudge cherry picks articles to further the conservative ideology. I am not saying that the entire media landscape is dumbed down to my side versus everything else.
What exactly is the commonality between ABC News and the Economist absent a conservative puritanism? There is a liberal media like Vox or the New Republic certainly but saying that each any every outlet outside of the conservative media is the same should be a nonstarter.
You really need to work on your logic if you intend on passing the bar. You need to able to see quickly that categorizing a limited set is not analogous to categorizing an open exclusionary set.
Why does this cuck TSA always sets himself to fail? First it was Hillary will 100% get indicted. Then it was Podesta is a pedo and will get criminally charged. Then Susan Rice is the leaker GO GET HER FBI.
Then now Seth Rich was murdered by the DNC. And now he's in full throated denial about the Comey memos.
Dumb ass .
Also the intel came from Israel and they look forward to continuing intelligence sharing.
lawyer smack
Welsher still begging for my attention after months of no replies
You're not a lawyer. How can that be smack? You're ability to discern how sets are categorized is lacking.
Prima facie, it should have been obvious. In short, "X" is not analogous to "not Y."
You tried to nit pick and failed. Deal with it.
Yup
Do your own reading. Read All the articles from the past two days from the publications I gave you. All of them. Also while you are working turn on NPR. I do this when I'm doing more mundane stuff.
So what's your theory? I like mine. I would bet on mine.
How did the WaPo get this, contrive this.
Your turn.
Go.
Then maybe a bet is in order over our two theories.
Last edited by pgardn; 05-16-2017 at 08:29 PM.
You should probably read the article first and then replace the underwear you just prematurely ejactulated in
Before I waste my time just tell me whether or not you actually read that the NSA was terrified and leaked to the WaPo.
The silence is defining and tells all you need to know.
Trump likes to refute and now he's being MIA. Cant spin your way outta this one orange ferret.
No. Maybe appalled or sickened. And you are wasting your time if you keep stemming off the same WaPo article. This just brings a problem to light. There are many questions still to be answered. You need to read ALL the articles from ALL the publications I mentioned. And about this waste of your time... 4chan is a what? A highly informative look into the intelligence community? Yeah?
Your theory now.
You are a big boy, old boy.
Whats your idea? How did the WaPo come upon this?
Lock them up!
Just like how he was quiet as a church mouse after the grab em fiasco.
TSA
Go to 4chan and find out who Bossert talked to.
You can help take down the intelligence community, they all need replacing you said, here is a start:
The concern was raised by Homeland security adviser Thomas Bossert, according to an administration source. Bossert, who was not in the meeting, read a classified summary of the discussion and realized that the plot was discussed. Bossert felt the intel community needed to know what was said.
And now your theory.
If you please.
We can have a bet for you to leave.
Forever.
It's all falling apart.
I still can't believe Trump blew all his political capital on inauguration crowd size.
Once you saw that you knew it was going to become a show of massive proportion.
There are currently 9 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 9 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote