Yeah, Hannity backed off due to "backlash" and "out of respect for the family". It's not that he quickly realized this kim dotcom is completely full of and Hannity needed to save as much face as possible. That would just be too big a leap in logic
Damn lots of strange happening last few days
Hannity doubles down on Monday on Seth Rich theory and Kim Dotcom tweets that he knew Seth Rich and knows for a fact he is DNC leaker and wikileaks source. Said he helped him get in contact with wikileaks
Hannity then aggrees to have him on his show tonight
The interview never hapoened cause of the backlash on Hannity. And also cause Rich family got publicly involved. Why?? Makes no sense, wouldnt a family want to know if theres anything more to learn about their son??
Dotcom is consulting with his lawyers on how to proceed, Hannity seems to have dropped the subject for now
Why so much fuss over a simple theory?
Yeah, Hannity backed off due to "backlash" and "out of respect for the family". It's not that he quickly realized this kim dotcom is completely full of and Hannity needed to save as much face as possible. That would just be too big a leap in logic
Such devotion from Seth Rich's parents
Sacrificing their son to Hillary
Pretty much. Hannity knows it's bull even for him but spins it so he's the victim.
because it all ties back to the pizza
May 2015
In an interview with Emily Chang on Bloomberg’s Studio 1.0, Dotcom was asked about a tweet he sent in December saying that he himself will be “Hillary’s worst nightmare in 2016.”
The interview raises the question of the role hacking could play in an election involving someone as simultaneously high profile and secretive as Clinton.
“I have to say it’s probably more Julian,” who threatens Hillary, Dotcom said. “But I’m aware of some of the things that are going to be roadblocks for her.”
Assange has access to information, Dotcom said, though he added that he didn't know anything more specific.
https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/a...htmare-in-2016
doesn't kim dotcom have a do ented history of dishonesty including multiple convictions relating to dishonest behavior?
According to this guy it was a smear campaign started in 2014 to cover up Snowden revelations about New Zealand's role in mass surveillance
https://contraspin.co.nz/someone-is-...ut-kim-dotcom/
oh, so his embezzlement conviction in 2003 was part of a coverup that started in 2014
I didn't know much at all about him so just had to wiki what you were talking about. That fat has lived one of an interesting life geez
He just lost an extradition case to the US a few months ago.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...gh-court-rules
Basically, he's ready to make any deals that come his way, coz he's going to jail for a while.
Doubt he will get extradited. At least not while Trumps in office.
So far hes living in his mansion and driving his dozens of supercars
Russians pushing this conspiracy hard, no doubt.
DNC is de able
Your worker is killed and you offer no reward on investigation
Apparently Kimdotcom is negotiating safe passage to speak what he knows in congress
Starting to look like Dotcom may actually have something. Groundwork is already being put in place to say anything Dotcom has is forged. Same tactic the DNC tried to use to discredit Wikileaks right before the email dumps.
"The latest revelation — that someone may have been trying to hack into Rich’s email — offered fresh evidence that the conspiracy theory is false. The family worried that Dotcom, or someone eager to prove him right, may have been willing to create a fake archive of emails from Rich, or crack a password to see whether Rich had passed on do ents with a Mega account."
https://www.washingtonpost.com/power...=.44aa5f5c8e20
ST's political forum is the most entertaining way to spend study breaks
Redtube is better
It just doesnt make sense that Dotcom would join the melee unless he got something
Hes a billionaire living the life in Auckland
Something is strange here
ha, i thought redtube would be a political forum, so i looked it up.
is kim dotcom from san antonio?
I don't believe Assange would be playing along with Dotcom if this was all just a ruse.
Morons.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)