Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    51,121
    Found a good resource during my lunch reading today:
    (pdf)
    https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL34303.pdf

    Very detailed, well-sourced, and thorough.

    Trump's actions in regard to the Russia probes probably falls under

    "Obstruction by Intimidation, Threats, Persuasion, or Deception (18 U.S.C. 1512(b) "

    By my first skimming.

    A bit from the summary at the beginning:

    Obstruction of justice is the impediment of governmental activities. There are a host of federal
    criminal laws that prohibit obstructions of justice. The six most general outlaw obstruction of
    judicial proceedings (18 U.S.C. 1503), witness tampering (18 U.S.C. 1512), witness retaliation
    (18 U.S.C. 1513), obstruction of congressional or administrative proceedings (18 U.S.C. 1505),
    conspiracy to defraud the United States (18 U.S.C. 371), and contempt (a creature of statute, rule
    and common law).
    Moreover, regardless of the offense for which an individual is convicted, his sentence may be
    enhanced as a consequence of any obstruction of justice for which he is responsible, if committed
    during the course of the investigation, prosecution, or sentencing for the offense of his conviction.
    The enhancement may result in an increase in his term of imprisonment by as much as four years.

  2. #2
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    51,121
    Shameless bump, because it is relevant.

  3. #3
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    51,121
    Holy balls, look at what I found...

    Mueller notes that... I was actually right about this, sourced and everything.

  4. #4
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    100,825
    i think the mueller report laid out a pretty good case for obstruction. they determined that due to DOJ policy of not indicting a sitting president, that they also were not allowed to formally conclude that he obstructed. instead they just laid out all their findings, and i think it's fairly clear. its up to congress to decide the political play of impeachment is worthwhile

  5. #5
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    Dems won't do

  6. #6
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    Bush's speech writer

    House leaders should lay the groundwork for impeachment

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...=.7fad2c0f8bac

  7. #7
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Post Count
    12,591
    Found a good resource during my lunch reading today:
    (pdf)
    https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL34303.pdf

    Very detailed, well-sourced, and thorough.

    Trump's actions in regard to the Russia probes probably falls under

    "Obstruction by Intimidation, Threats, Persuasion, or Deception (18 U.S.C. 1512(b) "

    By my first skimming.

    A bit from the summary at the beginning:
    yup

    been saying this


    Trump is obstructing Congress now...he never learns

  8. #8
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    51,121
    i think the mueller report laid out a pretty good case for obstruction. they determined that due to DOJ policy of not indicting a sitting president, that they also were not allowed to formally conclude that he obstructed. instead they just laid out all their findings, and i think it's fairly clear. its up to congress to decide the political play of impeachment is worthwhile
    ... and now we have Boltons book.

    "obstruction of justice as a way of life".

    I think there will be enough smoking guns to charge him after he leaves office.

    Too bad Biden probably won't have the stones to do it.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •