Reply With Quote
Umm, you're the one that bought his and has been eating it for a year at this point.
He's workin' ya's like a $3 .
Trash's tapes?Suck Low says Trash will "address" the tapes this week.
muhahahahahahahaha!!!
Umm, you're the one that bought his and has been eating it for a year at this point.
Been the best year of me life.
Let us proceed...
Depends on the construction of "personal relationship".Mueller may have to recuse himself
RandomGuy you're the self proclaimed conflict of interest specialist what's your take?
Comey isn't the one being investigated.
Hard to tell from a tweet, without researching.
Seems to sum it up for me.
A flaw, but not a significant one. The problem with holding such, is that the pool of potential special counsel people is so small.
So you're an old white trash guy with an admittedly broken and vicariously living through Trump in your twilight years is the best you've ever been able to do in life?
Seems I am not alone. +1i dont see how there's a conflict of interest if comey isnt the subject of the investigation.
the result of the investigation or potential charges are completely inconsequential as to comey. he doesn't stand to benefit from it one way or the other.
i'd have to sift through case law on what cons utes a conflict on interests in this scenario to be certain, and i dont have a ton of time. my gut says no. if you have to recuse yourself because you have a conflict with any tangentially related party to an investigation, then how the can people in government ever be investigated without a conflict somewhere?
how can anybody in the FBI investigate if comey was the director of the FBI
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/show...=1#post9049563
I asked mine first.
In response to my question, you have simply asked a slew of questions in response.
I can't monitor 100% of your posts to follow along, sorry.
I can, however, hold your feet to the fire when you are being evasive and intellectually dishonest, which you do all the time.
If it makes you feel better, pick one you want answered.
Otherwise I am going to hammer this home.
Hmm. I didn't think my question was that hard.
It is almost as if you don't want to, or can't answer it, and this is a recurring pattern in our interactions. Instead of dealing with something that you might not like directly, you dodge and deflect. It usually takes about 3-5 times of me asking a direct question to get an answer.
You would do well to think about why that is. Here is something you might find helpful.
https://designmatrix.wordpress.com/2...ual-honesty-2/
So, let's try one more time, so we can get to something we can agree with. A good debate has to establish facts, and lay ground work, and that can't be done if basic reality can't be agreed on.10. Be willing to publicly acknowledge when a point or criticism is good. If someone is unable or unwilling to admit when their opponent raises a good point or makes a good criticism, it demonstrates an unwillingness to participate in the give-and-take that characterizes an honest exchange.
What steps has the Trump administration undertaken to hold Russia to account for this?
Trump has had harsher words for ing Canada, than Russia.
Let that sink in. Take all the time you need.
Most transparent administration ever
Judicial Watch: Obama NSC Advisor Susan Rice’s Unmasking Material is at Obama Library
JUNE 19, 2017
Records Sought by Judicial Watch May Remain Closed to the Public for Five Years
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch today announced that the National Security Council (NSC) on May 23, 2017, informed it by letter that the materials regarding the unmasking by Obama National Security Advisor Susan Rice of “the iden ies of any U.S. citizens associated with the Trump presidential campaign or transition team” have been removed to the Obama Library.
The NSC will not fulfill an April 4 Judicial Watch request for records regarding information relating to people “who were identified pursuant to intelligence collection activities.”
The agency also informed Judicial Watch that it would not turn over communications with any Intelligence Community member or agency concerning the alleged Russian involvement in the 2016 presidential election; the hacking of DNC computers; or the suspected communications between Russia and Trump campaign/transition officials. Specifically, the NSC told Judicial Watch:
Do ents from the Obama administration have been transferred to the Barack Obama Presidential Library. You may send your request to the Obama Library. However, you should be aware that under the Presidential Records Act, Presidential records remain closed to the public for five years after an administration has left office.
Judicial Watch’s Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) April 4 request sought:
1.) Any and all requests for information, analyses, summaries, assessments, transcripts, or similar records submitted to any Intelligence Community member agency or any official, employee, or representative thereof by former National Security Advisor Susan Rice regarding, concerning, or related to the following:
Any actual or suspected effort by the Russian government or any individual acting on behalf of the Russian government to influence or otherwise interfere with the 2016 presidential election.
The alleged hacking of computer systems utilized by the Democratic National Committee and/or the Clinton presidential campaign.
Any actual or suspected communication between any member of the Trump presidential campaign or transition team and any official or employee of the Russian government or any individual acting on behalf of the Russian government.
The iden ies of U.S. citizens associated with the Trump presidential campaign or transition team who were identified pursuant to intelligence collection activities.
2.) Any and all records or responses received by former National Security Advisor Susan Rice and/or any member, employee, staff member, or representative of the National Security Council in response to any request described in part 1 of this request.
3.) Any and all records of communication between any official, employee, or representative of the Department of any Intelligence Community member agency and former National Security Advisor Susan Rice and/or any member, employee, staff member, or representative of the National Security Council regarding, concerning, or related to any request described in Part 1 of this request.
The time frame for this request was January 1, 2016, to the April 4, 2017.
While acknowledging in its FOIA request that “we are cognizant of the finding by the Court of Appeals … that [the NSC] “does not exercise sufficiently independent authority to be an ‘agency’ for purposes of the Freedom of Information Act,” Judicial Watch argued:
The records sought in this request pertain to actions by the former National Security Advisor that demonstrate a much higher degree of independent authority than was contemplated by the court; specifically, the issuance of directives to the Intelligence Community related to the handling of classified national security information…
The recent revelations of the role of Susan Rice in the unmasking the names of U.S. citizens identified in the course of intelligence collection activities and the potential that her actions contributed to the unauthorized disclosure of classified national security information are matters of great public interest.
Judicial Watch has filed six FOIA lawsuits related to the surveillance, unmasking, and illegal leaking targeting President Trump and his associates (see here, here, here, here, here and here).
“Prosecutors, Congress, and the public will want to know when the National Security Council shipped off the records about potential intelligence abuses by the Susan Rice and others in the Obama White House to the memory hole of the Obama Presidential Library,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “We are considering our legal options but we hope that the Special Counsel and Congress also consider their options and get these records.”
http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-r...obama-library/
bad ass
Democratic lawmakers press Flynn on Middle East trips
Democratic lawmakers investigating fired national security adviser Michael Flynn's security clearance said Monday
they could not find the hotel Flynn said he stayed at during a 2015 trip to Saudi Arabia or
any record of a conference he reported attending.
In a letter to companies for which Flynn worked, U.S. Representatives Elijah mings and Eliot Engel requested do ents related to Flynn's work in Saudi Arabia, Russia and other countries. They said
Flynn had not accurately reported his foreign travels and contacts in a 2016 application to renew his security clearance.
While Flynn disclosed an October 2015 trip to Saudi Arabia, mings and Engel said Flynn omitted key details and said they could not identify any conference he may have attended or find the hotel he reported staying at during the trip.
The two lawmakers said they were most
troubled by the lack of any Flynn record identifying "even a single foreign government official he had contact with in the seven years prior to submitting his security clearance application."
mings and Engel also cited a recent Newsweek report which said Flynn took a trip to the Middle East in the summer of 2015 in pursuit of a joint U.S.-Russian venture to develop nuclear facilities, in a deal to be financed by Saudi Arabia.
"If this press report is accurate,
General Flynn's failure to report this trip and any contacts with foreign government officials about this Saudi-Russian nuclear proposal
appears to be a potential violation" of a law against making false statements to federal officials,
the letter said.
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-us...litics+News%29
Flynn is the Little Dutch Boy with his stuck in the holding back the flood of Trash + entourage corruption.
I'm on pins and needles.
Flynn is Trash's Alexander Butterfield
Obama has horrible with transparency. He failed on that pledge almost as soon as he took office and realized the practicality of the pledge. A bit like Trump with ... everything.Most transparent administration ever
Judicial Watch: Obama NSC Advisor Susan Rice’s Unmasking Material is at Obama Library
JUNE 19, 2017
Records Sought by Judicial Watch May Remain Closed to the Public for Five Years
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch today announced that the National Security Council (NSC) on May 23, 2017, informed it by letter that the materials regarding the unmasking by Obama National Security Advisor Susan Rice of “the iden ies of any U.S. citizens associated with the Trump presidential campaign or transition team” have been removed to the Obama Library.
The NSC will not fulfill an April 4 Judicial Watch request for records regarding information relating to people “who were identified pursuant to intelligence collection activities.”
The agency also informed Judicial Watch that it would not turn over communications with any Intelligence Community member or agency concerning the alleged Russian involvement in the 2016 presidential election; the hacking of DNC computers; or the suspected communications between Russia and Trump campaign/transition officials. Specifically, the NSC told Judicial Watch:
Do ents from the Obama administration have been transferred to the Barack Obama Presidential Library. You may send your request to the Obama Library. However, you should be aware that under the Presidential Records Act, Presidential records remain closed to the public for five years after an administration has left office.
Judicial Watch’s Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) April 4 request sought:
1.) Any and all requests for information, analyses, summaries, assessments, transcripts, or similar records submitted to any Intelligence Community member agency or any official, employee, or representative thereof by former National Security Advisor Susan Rice regarding, concerning, or related to the following:
Any actual or suspected effort by the Russian government or any individual acting on behalf of the Russian government to influence or otherwise interfere with the 2016 presidential election.
The alleged hacking of computer systems utilized by the Democratic National Committee and/or the Clinton presidential campaign.
Any actual or suspected communication between any member of the Trump presidential campaign or transition team and any official or employee of the Russian government or any individual acting on behalf of the Russian government.
The iden ies of U.S. citizens associated with the Trump presidential campaign or transition team who were identified pursuant to intelligence collection activities.
2.) Any and all records or responses received by former National Security Advisor Susan Rice and/or any member, employee, staff member, or representative of the National Security Council in response to any request described in part 1 of this request.
3.) Any and all records of communication between any official, employee, or representative of the Department of any Intelligence Community member agency and former National Security Advisor Susan Rice and/or any member, employee, staff member, or representative of the National Security Council regarding, concerning, or related to any request described in Part 1 of this request.
The time frame for this request was January 1, 2016, to the April 4, 2017.
While acknowledging in its FOIA request that “we are cognizant of the finding by the Court of Appeals … that [the NSC] “does not exercise sufficiently independent authority to be an ‘agency’ for purposes of the Freedom of Information Act,” Judicial Watch argued:
The records sought in this request pertain to actions by the former National Security Advisor that demonstrate a much higher degree of independent authority than was contemplated by the court; specifically, the issuance of directives to the Intelligence Community related to the handling of classified national security information…
The recent revelations of the role of Susan Rice in the unmasking the names of U.S. citizens identified in the course of intelligence collection activities and the potential that her actions contributed to the unauthorized disclosure of classified national security information are matters of great public interest.
Judicial Watch has filed six FOIA lawsuits related to the surveillance, unmasking, and illegal leaking targeting President Trump and his associates (see here, here, here, here, here and here).
“Prosecutors, Congress, and the public will want to know when the National Security Council shipped off the records about potential intelligence abuses by the Susan Rice and others in the Obama White House to the memory hole of the Obama Presidential Library,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “We are considering our legal options but we hope that the Special Counsel and Congress also consider their options and get these records.”
http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-r...obama-library/
Obama was also horrible about prosecuting whistleblowers.
He did, however release his ing taxes.
I'm on pins and needles.
There are currently 4 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 4 guests)
Posting Permissions