That was his choice. I don't want to see their taxes. I don't anyone to see mine.
Why do you think the Obama administration would move materials regarding the unmasking by Obama National Security Advisor Susan Rice of “the iden ies of any U.S. citizens associated with the Trump presidential campaign or transition team” to the Obama Library?
Why do you think the Trump administration has been silent on the Russian election attack?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Anybody see a pattern yet?
Last edited by RandomGuy; 06-20-2017 at 10:13 AM.
Maybe they are aware many parts are fabricated and the rest is blown out of proportion? The only thing that has actually been 100% confirmed is that Russia hired posters to push out memes and fake stories during the election.
Moving on, why do you think the Obama administration would move materials regarding the unmasking by Obama National Security Advisor Susan Rice of “the iden ies of any U.S. citizens associated with the Trump presidential campaign or transition team” to the Obama Library?
Yes, you sound like John McCain
Russian agents hacked US voting system manufacturer before US election – report
Russian hackers breached voting systems in 39 US statesMinimizing their efforts, because your guy won the Whitehouse."We were all kind of hoping that the election hacking was at the cognitive level: propaganda, doxing, influence operations. But this is proof that they were actually closer to the tactical, technical level," says Kenneth Geers, an ambassador to NATO's Cyber Center who has long followed Russian hacking campaigns. “They were closer to the guts, to the operating system of our democracy, than we knew.”
Wow.
Just wow. That is some serious party over country bull .
Trump president, not Obama.
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/show...=1#post9049563
I asked mine first.
In response to my question, you have simply asked a slew of questions in response.
I can't monitor 100% of your posts to follow along, sorry.
I can, however, hold your feet to the fire when you are being evasive and intellectually dishonest, which you do all the time.
If it makes you feel better, pick one you want answered.
Otherwise I am going to hammer this home.
Hmm. I didn't think my question was that hard.
It is almost as if you don't want to, or can't answer it, and this is a recurring pattern in our interactions. Instead of dealing with something that you might not like directly, you dodge and deflect. It usually takes about 3-5 times of me asking a direct question to get an answer.
You would do well to think about why that is. Here is something you might find helpful.
https://designmatrix.wordpress.com/2...ual-honesty-2/
So, let's try one more time, so we can get to something we can agree with. A good debate has to establish facts, and lay ground work, and that can't be done if basic reality can't be agreed on.10. Be willing to publicly acknowledge when a point or criticism is good. If someone is unable or unwilling to admit when their opponent raises a good point or makes a good criticism, it demonstrates an unwillingness to participate in the give-and-take that characterizes an honest exchange.
What steps has the Trump administration undertaken to hold Russia to account for this?
The answer to my easily answered question is nothing. That is what TSA doesn't want to admit.
Maybe their archivists decided that it would be better catalogued there.
Moving on, why do you think Russia isn't such a priority to Trump, when he criticizes literally everyone else at the drop of a hat?
This is a meltdown of epic proportions
THE NSA CONFIRMS IT: RUSSIA HACKED FRENCH ELECTION ‘INFRASTRUCTURE’
https://www.wired.com/2017/05/nsa-di...nfrastructure/
Maybe TSA thinks the Democrats did this too?
It's ok. You did it to yourself, really.
Trust me I'll survive. Not sure if you'll be able to though, your fall from grace after the election has been something to witness.
Why the sarcasm and intellectual dishonesty? It is almost as if you don't want to, or can't answer it, and this is a recurring pattern in our interactions. Instead of dealing with something that you might not like directly, you dodge and deflect. It usually takes about 3-5 times of me asking a direct question to get an answer.
Why do you think the Obama administration would move materials regarding the unmasking by Obama National Security Advisor Susan Rice of “the iden ies of any U.S. citizens associated with the Trump presidential campaign or transition team” to the Obama Library?
because he's a bad ass that will own trump forever.
TSA is perfect American stupid boy for Mother Russia. We can do anything and he still only talk pizza and the blacks.
The super sophisticated and highly skilled Russian hacking team once again is super sloppy and left their fingerprints all over the hack. The Wikileaks vault 7 dump really throws a wrench in your attempts to assign attribution.THE NSA CONFIRMS IT: RUSSIA HACKED FRENCH ELECTION ‘INFRASTRUCTURE’
https://www.wired.com/2017/05/nsa-di...nfrastructure/
Maybe TSA thinks the Democrats did this too?
"And the trove of Macron's party emails published as torrent files Friday included metadata in Cyrillic, suggesting that they had been edited on a computer running software with Russian-language configurations. That metadata even included the name Roshka Georgiy Petrovich, reportedly an employee of the Russian intelligence contractor Eureka.
But at the time of the Trend Micro report, the Macron campaign denied it had been breached. And for some cybersecurity analysts, the Russian metadata included in the leak was so blatant that it raised su ions that someone—perhaps another country or hacker group—was intending to create a "fall guy" for the attack."
Let's get something on the table.
Not answering it. You chose not to answer mine. That goes both ways.
I really, truly don't give a about this made up outrage you are trying to push to deflect from Trumps many, many, flaws. It is a little sad.
The thing about bull conspiracy theories is that they are so easy to poke holes in.
Bull conspiracy theorists also tend to overwhelmingly be sophists, who make bad arguments, distort things, and never, ever, admit the faults in their arguments.
That is how you detect bull .
When you repeatedly dodge direct questions, you get to sit in the same box as Cosmored, with good reason. Congratulations TSA, you get to sit in the corner with the guy who thinks the moon landings were faked. You two have a nice chat.
Poor Russia being framed.
"some analysts"...
TSA ignores the Russian election interference for the same reason that Trump and Breitbart does: mindless partisanship. At least Trump is partisan to himself. What's TSA's reasoning?
tsa and putin both want everyone in the us to have an arsenal of guns
If it wasn't a series of incidences and not just one and if it was not using the same network and proxies that the Russians have used then that might be plausible.Poor Russia being framed.
"some analysts"...
Presenting it as a singular event that someone tried to spoof is disingenuous to say the least.
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
