Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 76 to 100 of 170
  1. #76
    Guest Personality Hoops Czar's Avatar
    My Team
    Cleveland Cavaliers
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Post Count
    8,541
    Spurs probably gonna try to woo Teodosic.

  2. #77
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    153,473
    We're not beating the dubs with LMA and Fathead still on the team... might as well pay for some entertainment, tbh...

  3. #78
    Machacarredes Chinook's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Post Count
    32,115
    We're not beating the dubs with LMA and Fathead still on the team... might as well pay for some entertainment, tbh...
    Need I remind you:



    Dude's a Warriors killer

  4. #79
    ಥ﹏ಥ DAF86's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Post Count
    47,238
    It depends on what the Spurs do to make the space. They'd have plenty of room if they dump LMA for example, and they could use some of that excess on a guard. And if they do trade LMA, would they get a guard back or a pick they'd use on a guard? Would the Spurs re-sign Mills and run Patty/Murray as their backup guards?

    It's not clean cut. Right now (meaning barring trades or stretching Tony), it really doesn't look like Paul is an option, but they still will have the cap room to go after other guys.
    I'm not a master of the Cap space, but wouldn't signing Paul take more or less the same cap space than Aldridge's contract? If so, how can that leave enough room to sign other quality players?

    And I'm all-in regarding trading Aldridge for wings. In that case, I wouldn't mind Manu not coming back, tbh. But you on the other hand, want to get rid of Manu no matter what, and that's just stupid. If the only wings the Spurs can get are rookies and Hanga or Simmons, then Manu coming back for the minimum is a necessity more than a loyalty contract.

  5. #80
    俺はまんこが大好きなんだよ baseline bum's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    97,883
    And I'm all-in regarding trading Aldridge for wings.
    I'd trade that got for chicken wings.

  6. #81
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    153,473
    Need I remind you:



    Dude's a Warriors killer
    I was expecting a SAGirl reaction, but this will do just fine, IMO...

  7. #82
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    4,829
    If Spurs trade DG, they should net back a 1st round pick.

    If they trade DG, it won't be a good move if they blindly draft/stash their picks. This draft has a lot of value. I'll be pissed.

    Get ready to be pissed....

  8. #83
    Veteran spursistan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    14,864


    Manu could play until 45..No kidding..Dude has shown me he still could be a contributor on this team..I feel like his play in the second half of Rockets series and Golden State one haschanged his mind after looking like he was completely done vs Memphis

    For minimum , why not?

    And especially if someone like CP3 comes, the locker room/bench needs an assertive and historical leader like Ginobili to maintain team hierarchy since Parker will be out for most of year..

  9. #84
    Machacarredes Chinook's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Post Count
    32,115
    I'm not a master of the Cap space, but wouldn't signing Paul take more or less the same cap space than Aldridge's contract? If so, how can that leave enough room to sign other quality players?
    The Spurs have $25 Million with Pau opting out. LMA is making $21 Million. Paul would cost $35 Million. There are definitely other factors I'm overlooking, and I'll do a full breakdown tonight. But there would be room.

    But you on the other hand, want to get rid of Manu no matter what, and that's just stupid.
    I don't want Manu in the rotation no matter what. I don't care what he costs. Yes, I'd rather pay Simmons four times the min than have Manu in the rotation for the min. And I don't like Simmons.

    I also don't want to spend a ton on Paul. I'd much rather them upgrade their rotation than get involved in these huge deals.

  10. #85
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    8,696
    We're not beating the dubs with LMA and Fathead still on the team... might as well pay for some entertainment, tbh...
    Truth

  11. #86
    Guest Personality Hoops Czar's Avatar
    My Team
    Cleveland Cavaliers
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Post Count
    8,541
    Spurs aren't beating the Dubs unless Manu is the 10th best player on the roster either.

  12. #87
    Veteran sasaint's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    14,298
    I'd trade that got for chicken wings.
    Agreed!

  13. #88
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Post Count
    8,041
    Get ready to be pissed....
    I hope your source is wrong.

  14. #89
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Post Count
    8,041
    Get ready to be pissed....
    So you're telling me SA would trade DG for nothing? Just a salary dump?

    That would even be worse.

    The logical thing would be to trade DG for a draft pick and USE the pick, all while getting space to sign CP3.

  15. #90
    Big in Japan GSH's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Post Count
    14,093
    Manu leaning towards coming back


  16. #91
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Post Count
    8,041
    I'd much rather trade Kyle Anderson for a 2nd rounder (33rd or 35th) to create enough room for max than draft and stash or trade the 1st(s) ( Danny may net another 1st).

  17. #92
    ಥ﹏ಥ DAF86's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Post Count
    47,238
    The Spurs have $25 Million with Pau opting out. LMA is making $21 Million. Paul would cost $35 Million. There are definitely other factors I'm overlooking, and I'll do a full breakdown tonight. But there would be room.



    I don't want Manu in the rotation no matter what. I don't care what he costs. Yes, I'd rather pay Simmons four times the min than have Manu in the rotation for the min. And I don't like Simmons.

    I also don't want to spend a ton on Paul. I'd much rather them upgrade their rotation than get involved in these huge deals.
    Well then, that's where we are never going to get on the same page, so I'm cool with agreeing on disagreeing, as long as you realize that you have a pretty stupid opinion on this matter, tbh.

  18. #93
    Mostly good takes Dverde's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Post Count
    4,162
    Manu always leans since he lost that testicle.

  19. #94
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    4,829
    So you're telling me SA would trade DG for nothing? Just a salary dump?

    That would even be worse.

    The logical thing would be to trade DG for a draft pick and USE the pick, all while getting space to sign CP3.

    Maybe you're correct and I hope that's the case..

  20. #95
    Guest Personality Hoops Czar's Avatar
    My Team
    Cleveland Cavaliers
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Post Count
    8,541
    Well then, that's where we are never going to get on the same page, so I'm cool with agreeing on disagreeing, as long as you realize that you have a pretty stupid opinion on this matter, tbh.

  21. #96
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Post Count
    14,854
    I don't think Green is going anywhere. The whole point of Spurs/Paul alliance would be to have strongest team possible and trading away Green flies in the face of that.

    If he signs, the most logical scenario would be a 1+1 contract worth $25M in 1st season, opting out after and signing a 4 year max. He'd make "only" $10M less than Clippers can offer.

  22. #97
    Like I said... tmtcsc's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Post Count
    7,148
    It depends on what the Spurs do to make the space. They'd have plenty of room if they dump LMA for example, and they could use some of that excess on a guard. And if they do trade LMA, would they get a guard back or a pick they'd use on a guard? Would the Spurs re-sign Mills and run Patty/Murray as their backup guards?

    It's not clean cut. Right now (meaning barring trades or stretching Tony), it really doesn't look like Paul is an option, but they still will have the cap room to go after other guys.
    Chris Paul is not worthy of Max money. I hope the Spurs don't burn all their space on him. I'd like him on the team for 20 to 25 Mill at most.

  23. #98
    what uganda do about it? Joseph Kony's Avatar
    My Team
    Seattle Supersonics
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    7,551
    I don't get why Chinook hates Manu so much if he came back for the minimum to play 10-15mpg i don't see a problem with that...he was the only guy playing his ass off against GS

  24. #99
    Wolf Ruvinskis tonight...you's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Post Count
    6,497
    Manu leaning towards coming back

    HA ha ha ha! Awesome.

  25. #100
    Big in Japan GSH's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Post Count
    14,093
    Chris Paul is not worthy of Max money. I hope the Spurs don't burn all their space on him. I'd like him on the team for 20 to 25 Mill at most.

    If the Spurs could score CP3 for $20M, the GM Of The Year award would be a lock.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •