We're not beating the dubs with LMA and Fathead still on the team... might as well pay for some entertainment, tbh...![]()
Spurs probably gonna try to woo Teodosic.
We're not beating the dubs with LMA and Fathead still on the team... might as well pay for some entertainment, tbh...![]()
Need I remind you:
Dude's a Warriors killer
I'm not a master of the Cap space, but wouldn't signing Paul take more or less the same cap space than Aldridge's contract? If so, how can that leave enough room to sign other quality players?
And I'm all-in regarding trading Aldridge for wings. In that case, I wouldn't mind Manu not coming back, tbh. But you on the other hand, want to get rid of Manu no matter what, and that's just stupid. If the only wings the Spurs can get are rookies and Hanga or Simmons, then Manu coming back for the minimum is a necessity more than a loyalty contract.
I'd trade that got for chicken wings.
I was expecting a SAGirl reaction, but this will do just fine, IMO...
Get ready to be pissed....
Manu could play until 45..No kidding..Dude has shown me he still could be a contributor on this team..I feel like his play in the second half of Rockets series and Golden State one haschanged his mind after looking like he was completely done vs Memphis
For minimum , why not?
And especially if someone like CP3 comes, the locker room/bench needs an assertive and historical leader like Ginobili to maintain team hierarchy since Parker will be out for most of year..
The Spurs have $25 Million with Pau opting out. LMA is making $21 Million. Paul would cost $35 Million. There are definitely other factors I'm overlooking, and I'll do a full breakdown tonight. But there would be room.
I don't want Manu in the rotation no matter what. I don't care what he costs. Yes, I'd rather pay Simmons four times the min than have Manu in the rotation for the min. And I don't like Simmons.But you on the other hand, want to get rid of Manu no matter what, and that's just stupid.
I also don't want to spend a ton on Paul. I'd much rather them upgrade their rotation than get involved in these huge deals.
Spurs aren't beating the Dubs unless Manu is the 10th best player on the roster either.
I hope your source is wrong.
So you're telling me SA would trade DG for nothing? Just a salary dump?
That would even be worse.
The logical thing would be to trade DG for a draft pick and USE the pick, all while getting space to sign CP3.
Manu leaning towards coming back
![]()
I'd much rather trade Kyle Anderson for a 2nd rounder (33rd or 35th) to create enough room for max than draft and stash or trade the 1st(s) ( Danny may net another 1st).
Well then, that's where we are never going to get on the same page, so I'm cool with agreeing on disagreeing, as long as you realize that you have a pretty stupid opinion on this matter, tbh.![]()
![]()
Manu always leans since he lost that testicle.
Maybe you're correct and I hope that's the case..
I don't think Green is going anywhere. The whole point of Spurs/Paul alliance would be to have strongest team possible and trading away Green flies in the face of that.
If he signs, the most logical scenario would be a 1+1 contract worth $25M in 1st season, opting out after and signing a 4 year max. He'd make "only" $10M less than Clippers can offer.
Chris Paul is not worthy of Max money. I hope the Spurs don't burn all their space on him. I'd like him on the team for 20 to 25 Mill at most.
I don't get why Chinook hates Manu so muchif he came back for the minimum to play 10-15mpg i don't see a problem with that...he was the only guy playing his ass off against GS
HA ha ha ha! Awesome.
If the Spurs could score CP3 for $20M, the GM Of The Year award would be a lock.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)