Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 57
  1. #26
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    100,825
    if there's one thing i trust about PATFO, it's their cap management

  2. #27
    WIS peacemaker885's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Post Count
    1,158
    He's one of Kawhi's boys. Not surprising.

  3. #28
    Guest Personality Hoops Czar's Avatar
    My Team
    Cleveland Cavaliers
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Post Count
    8,541
    The Spurs have extended a $1.6 million qualifying offer to make Jonathon Simmons a restricted free agent.


    He's staying, tbh.

    Formality really that the Spurs restricted him but far from a reality that he'll be back. He's going to see far better offers than that from other teams and it remains to be seen what the Spurs breaking point will be in terms of matching those offers.

  4. #29
    Pronouns: Your/Dad TheGreatYacht's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Post Count
    36,459
    Best Shooting Guard on the roster and it isn't close...

  5. #30
    Spurs forever DeRozan m8's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    2,238
    What an insulting offer LMFAO

    Best case scenario he declines, some other c*nt offers him whatever, we sort out our situation (CP3, Zinger, etc...) and then match the offer.

    Would give him a shot as starting SG tbh

  6. #31
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    100,825
    they're not expecting him to sign it ... its just to make him restricted

  7. #32
    Veteran cutewizard's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Post Count
    11,111
    Cool

  8. #33
    Veteran cutewizard's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Post Count
    11,111

  9. #34
    Veteran tbdog's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    5,167
    Some of you don't know how a qualifying offer works.

  10. #35
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Post Count
    8,041
    Renouncing Simmons makes little to no sense. It barely opens up 800K in cap space. 1.67 is his cap hold, but remember there's a 815K roster charge in his place if he's renounced. Makes no sense to renounce him.

  11. #36
    俺はまんこが大好きなんだよ baseline bum's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    97,883
    What an insulting offer LMFAO

    Best case scenario he declines, some other c*nt offers him whatever, we sort out our situation (CP3, Zinger, etc...) and then match the offer.

    Would give him a shot as starting SG tbh
    It's not an insulting offer. The value of qualifying offers is set by the collective bargaining agreement based on previous year's salary, and Simmons was playing on a two year minimum deal.

  12. #37
    Veteran r0drig0lac's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Post Count
    14,624
    Some of you don't know how a qualifying offer works.

  13. #38
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    3,313
    WTF are they doing? If they're going to dump Green, don't they need to renounce Simmons to free up max cap space?
    Just the opposite actually. If they trade Verde they have huge hole to fill at the 2.

  14. #39
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Post Count
    8,041
    If you actually do the math, Spurs won't have enough space for a max contract if they renounce Manu, Mills, Pau, DD, Lee. Trade DG. Then draft/stash pick, trade Kyle, trade Forbes. Still not enough because of 815K per roster charge. They have to trade another 10+ mil/year guy ( TP or LA). Trade LA and you get to keep pick, keep Kyle, keep Forbes/Bertans and have close to 50 mil in space.

    With Pau declining option.

    SA renouncing Manu, Pau, Mills, Dedmon, Lee.

    SA trading DG.

    Simmons cap hold at 1.67 mil

    Spurs should be at 29,376,682 in space.

    After that SA has options: If SA trades Kyle -- that's just creates 1.5 mil in space. Bringing us at 30.8 million. Then draft and stash the 29th -- that adds another 600K in space, which brings us at 31.4 million in space. Trading Forbes -- only saves around 100K (same w/ Bertans), which brings us at 31.5 million in space ( still not enough for CP3 Max).

    However if SA trades LA and gets back a top 20 pick ( 2-4 million cap hold) that should create another 17-19 million in space, bringing SA to 46-49 million in space. Enough to sign CP3, re-sign Pau then SA can go over cap to re-sign or match Simmons -- all while keeping the pick, Anderson, Forbes/Bertans. Spurs can re-sign Manu and Lee to the minimum after all dust settles too.

  15. #40
    Big in Japan GSH's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Post Count
    14,093
    If you actually do the math, Spurs won't have enough space for a max contract if they renounce Manu, Mills, Pau, DD, Lee. Trade DG. Then draft/stash pick, trade Kyle, trade Forbes. Still not enough because of 815K per roster charge. They have to trade another 10+ mil/year guy ( TP or LA). Trade LA and you get to keep pick, keep Kyle, keep Forbes/Bertans and have close to 50 mil in space.

    With Pau declining option.

    SA renouncing Manu, Pau, Mills, Dedmon, Lee.

    SA trading DG.

    Simmons cap hold at 1.67 mil

    Spurs should be at 29,376,682 in space.

    After that SA has options: If SA trades Kyle -- that's just creates 1.5 mil in space. Bringing us at 30.8 million. Then draft and stash the 29th -- that adds another 600K in space, which brings us at 31.4 million in space. Trading Forbes -- only saves around 100K (same w/ Bertans), which brings us at 31.5 million in space ( still not enough for CP3 Max).

    However if SA trades LA and gets back a top 20 pick ( 2-4 million cap hold) that should create another 17-19 million in space, bringing SA to 46-49 million in space. Enough to sign CP3, re-sign Pau then SA can go over cap to re-sign or match Simmons -- all while keeping the pick, Anderson, Forbes/Bertans. Spurs can re-sign Manu and Lee to the minimum after all dust settles too.

    That's it in a nuts . If the Spurs really are making a push at CP3, that's pretty much the way it has to fall I think. I guess they had to play it this way with Simmons.

  16. #41
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    3,313
    The only reason Paul comes to the Spurs is to win a ring. He understands the only way to do that is with the right pieces around him. The only way to do that is and still get similar money is under the Durant model. The notion that the Spurs have to free up max money this year is off base. If it is Paul's position it will be a short meeting. Also remember that the Spurs start with a 13 million dollar advantage over 5 years because of state income tax differentials. Combining the Durant model with the tax savings gets you within$10 million over5 years to the Clippers with a contract paying around$22 million this year.

  17. #42
    Five. DesignatedT's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    20,362
    at some of these posts.

  18. #43
    The Stone Cutter Jdspur20's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Post Count
    1,160
    Some of you don't know how a qualifying offer works.

  19. #44
    Big in Japan GSH's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Post Count
    14,093
    at some of these posts.

    You're just not sure which ones?

  20. #45
    Like I said... tmtcsc's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Post Count
    7,148
    Really? I know nothing about the subject but it was allegedly reported by J.Young Spurs were about 50/50 on bringing him back. They want to but he's going to be steeply prIced.
    I don't know about that, no one does really. Not until a team makes him an offer. He received plenty of hype during the playoffs from TV analysts but none of those guys are in charge of a team's budget. Simmons was good but not "we're going to offer this kid a mountain of money" good. , he only averaged 6.2 points a game. His outside shot is inconsistent and he's a little older than someone with 2 years of NBA experience. He made $874,636 last year. Spurs shouldn't break the bank for him.

  21. #46
    OG Spurs fan TheChillFactor's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    667
    What an insulting offer LMFAO

    Best case scenario he declines, some other c*nt offers him whatever, we sort out our situation (CP3, Zinger, etc...) and then match the offer.

    Would give him a shot as starting SG tbh
    a lot of times i read stuff on this forum and it pisses me off. This post is comforting because it reminds me not to get upset with you guys, you're a bunch of ing morons.

  22. #47
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Post Count
    4,770
    Some of you don't know how a qualifying offer works.
    So?

  23. #48
    Veteran rastaspur's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Post Count
    2,489
    What an insulting offer LMFAO

    Best case scenario he declines, some other c*nt offers him whatever, we sort out our situation (CP3, Zinger, etc...) and then match the offer.

    Would give him a shot as starting SG tbh
    Lol. It's a qualifying offer. It is just the start of the process. Qualifying offer is extended which triggers the whole rfa process.

  24. #49
    Hope springs eternal. SAGirl's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    27,774
    I don't know about that, no one does really. Not until a team makes him an offer. He received plenty of hype during the playoffs from TV analysts but none of those guys are in charge of a team's budget. Simmons was good but not "we're going to offer this kid a mountain of money" good. , he only averaged 6.2 points a game. His outside shot is inconsistent and he's a little older than someone with 2 years of NBA experience. He made $874,636 last year. Spurs shouldn't break the bank for him.
    I agree with your points. He was rumored to have a high number in his mind from which he wouldn't budge. We don't know what that is or what competing offers will be thrown at him. I am speculating based on the rumors and some common sense that he aims to get as much as he can (as he should) but in reality that price is still TBD

  25. #50
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Post Count
    18,794
    I agree with your points. He was rumored to have a high number in his mind from which he wouldn't budge. We don't know what that is or what competing offers will be thrown at him. I am speculating based on the rumors and some common sense that he aims to get as much as he can (as he should) but in reality that price is still TBD
    Maybe that number he had in mind is a number for the Spurs to retain him. I mean, maybe he wants to stay and if other teams offer more than the number he has in mind, he'll take a little less and stay with the Spurs if they meet that number he's happy with? or do you think that number is a minimum for any team?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •