Reply With Quote
this random thread. There's already one.
If I'm the win-now Cavs, I take that deal. If I'm the Spurs, I consider taking it.
this random thread. There's already one.
No, please stop!
I don't love the trade. I'm saying if the Paul George, etc plays don't work out and the Spurs are truly that disenchanted by LMA, then you might as well bring in a prime asset who will do the nitty gritty stuff. Though, TT was dog for half the series against the Warriors. But LMA was dog for the entire series vs. the Warriors.
I'd rather play with Aldridge then let him walk be we get TT, Steph out-rebounded him in the Finals. Plus aren't we chasing GSW and didn't he prove he can't play against them
I'd rather have Aldridge at this point. I was just throwing something out there. Then again, these past finals aside, a double-double guy that doesn't need plays called for him vs. a prima donna who is on a downhill is worthy of consideration. I think the people saying no are holding out for LMA to have one magical run, perhaps.
Last edited by Spurtacular; 06-23-2017 at 01:02 AM.
Don't need the Kardashian circus around the team.
That's a fair point.
oh I want Aldridge gone i'd just rather him over TT and his bad contract also
The guy was ing awful in the finals, only one good game. Not sure how this guy is more value than LMA
LMA is trash, no teams wants him...
Horrible trade idea. Cavs would do that trade in a second and it would ruin our free agency shopping for the next few years.
3way trade with Suns for Porzingis. Suns get LA. Then we bring CP3
Done.
His options are like previous Kardashians. Go to a bottom feeding team or go to China.
Never has been nor never will be a Championship team with a Kardashian.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
