Reply With Quote
Im legit surprised Darrin didn't compare his child to a horse tbh
Oh, nevermind, I actually watched the video and saw that you're just semen shielding for Trump. Again. You Trump non-fan, you.
Im legit surprised Darrin didn't compare his child to a horse tbh
It is impossible to calculate the moral mischief, if I may so express it, that mental lying has produced in society. When a man has so far corrupted and pros uted the chas y of his mind, as to subscribe his professional belief to things he does not believe, he has prepared himself for the commission of every other crime.
Boiled down:::He mopped the in' floor with her in' ass.
Depends.
What is the actual evidence about the harm?
Yeah, slip it on & STFU.
Do you understand what a post-hoc reasoning failure is?
You just made one.
Respectfully:
You are being unkind to someone who needs information, not derision.
This topic is important enough to take as seriously as possible, and the best way to get people to realized they might be wrong is to be respectful and insistent on evidence-based science.
Not that I am the best at this by any stretch, but I would point out that rmt is generally polite, informed, and honest.
FWIW.
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features...artisan-issue/
Will Trump Make Vaccines Another Partisan Issue?
By Harry Enten
Robert F. Kennedy Jr., radio host, environmental lawyer and nephew of President John F. Kennedy, told reporters on Tuesday that President-elect Donald Trump has asked him to be chairman of a commission on vaccines and scientific integrity. Kennedy has repeatedly said he believes in the widely discredited claim that vaccines cause autism. (They do not.)
It’s not clear that Kennedy will get the job or that the commission will be created. After Kennedy’s statement, the Trump transition team said that while Trump is exploring the possibility, no final decisions had been made. But medical experts immediately denounced the possibility, saying it could put children in danger, and as The Washington Post put it, putting Kennedy in charge of such a commission would be a “stunning move [that] would push up against established science, medicine and the government’s position on the issue.”
Beyond the disregard for scientific evidence, however, Trump’s decision to take up vaccine-related conspiracy theories could have the added effect of polarizing opinion on vaccines along partisan lines.
Vaccines now have wide, bipartisan support: Most Americans agree with the scientific consensus that they are safe. In a YouGov survey conducted last month, 72 percent of Democrats, 67 percent of independents and 71 percent of Republicans said it was not true that vaccines caused autism. Previous surveys also showed that the vast majority of Americans (of all political stripes) agreed that children should be required to get vaccinated and should not be allowed into school until they do.
But we live in polarized times, and there have been a few issues recently that — once ushered into the political limelight — have lost bipartisan support. Democratic and Republican opinion on Russia, for example, used to rise and fall in unison. But since Russia’s meddling in the 2016 election has become an issue, and Trump has said nice things about Russia and its president, Vladimir Putin, Republicans have started to see Russia substantially more favorably than Democrats do.
Something similar happened with the Electoral College. Trump’s victory, even though he lost the popular vote, has shifted opinions on that topic as well.
The current gap between Democrats and Republicans on whether the United States should decide presidential elections by popular vote — 50 percentage points — is the largest on record.
History also tells us that scientific issues can become polarized along partisan lines and stay that way. Back in 1998, 48 percent of Republicans and 47 percent of Democrats said that global warming had already begun, according to a Gallup survey. By 2007, after a decade of fighting between Democrats and Republicans on the issue — as well as the release of “An Inconvenient Truth” starring Al Gore — 70 percent of Democrats believed climate change had started. Republican belief in global warming remained relatively steady at 45 percent. Today, even fewer Republicans (40 percent) and even more Democrats (77 percent) believe climate change has already begun.
Evolution has also grown more polarized over the last decade. Back in 2005, the Pew Research Center found that 54 percent of Democrats and 47 percent of Republicans agreed that “humans and other living things have evolved due to natural processes such as natural selection.” By 2014, 67 percent of Democrats believed that humans had evolved because of natural processes. Republicans, however, remained at 47 percent.
We’re not sure that vaccines will become polarized along partisan lines. It’s not even clear to what extent Trump will take up the issue. But if he does, don’t be surprised if Republican and Democratic views on vaccines begin to diverge, even as the science stays the same.
An Insider's View: The Dark Rigidity of Fundamentalist Rural America
Basically: Religious fundamentalism (dogmatism of any kind really) creates the equivalent of a compromised immune system when it comes to bull , and countering it, especially on a collective basis.
The right in this country has a decided anti-science streak because of it, and on that basis, I would not be surprised if it becomes a partisan issue, with the GOP being the party of the anti-vaxxer.
Currently, as noted this flawed viewpoint is bipartisan. I do not expect that to hold, as I think 538 got it right.
We'll see.
Yes, because nobody on this site has ever tried that. She has never moved an inch on any of her moonbat craziness that I am aware of, except when I derided her because she was pissed off that climate science was taught in chemistry class. When informed carbon was a chemical on the periodic chart, I believe this cuntface said something like "oh really? hmmm". Under the veneer of "politeness" is an evil, cold-hearted who deserves nothing but scorn.
Give it your best shot. I believe the last one to try was spurraider21 but I could be wrong about it.
I'll stick with pointing out what a stupid cunt she is until you disprove me.
oh, and"informed"
i dont think i've ever directly conversed with rmt... but don't intend to.
im going to borrow a phrase from chinook... its like trying to pry a manhole with a toothpick
Well that's a bit more discriptive and diplomatic than labeling her a c***
Yes, because nobody on this site has ever tried that. She has never moved an inch on any of her moonbat craziness that I am aware of, except when I derided her because she was pissed off that climate science was taught in chemistry class. When informed carbon was a chemical on the periodic chart, I believe this cuntface said something like "oh really? hmmm". Under the veneer of "politeness" is an evil, cold-hearted who deserves nothing but scorn.
Give it your best shot. I believe the last one to try was spurraider21 but I could be wrong about it.
I'll stick with pointing out what a stupid cunt she is until you disprove me. oh, and
Fair enough. I will say that religion of the kind I think she believes in tends to inhibit true critical thinking, which, thankfully, is a skill that can be learned and taught.
I am an optimist, though.
I doubt that account is really a black female and it does not move an inch when respectfully shown information to the contrary of their preferred outcome. It will either stop posting or repeat itself. **** is not the word that I would choose but its not entirely inappropriate either.
You hear that everyone? Don't fly because of all the peanut dust.
Yeah, the anti vaxxers are all right wing loons
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...=.a4438b2ce8c7
i dont think there's anything inherently liberal or conservative about anti-vaxxers. robert kennedy jr is one of the staunchest anti-vax guys and he's on the left. jenny mccarthy was also a loud voice on the issue and she's not really political as far as i know
i think they're dangerous regardless. trump is currently the largest political mouthpiece in the US, and he's made his views clear... and many of his supporters will take anything he says as literal fact, so there are consequences. he's kept pretty quiet about it since that debate to my knowledge, so no complaints on that front as long as he keeps it that way
i dont know what liberal or conservative ideology would make somebody anti-vax... i dont think it can be defined on those terms
Last edited by spurraider21; 06-27-2017 at 06:21 PM.
A number of airlines don't serve peanuts anymore because of allergies.
just thayn
Louis CK is awesome.
Like he said...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
