If Hill wants to get paid, he'll stay with the Jazz. Otherwise he'll be taking a fairly big pay cut.
haven't come across okc being interested in anyone or being involved in rumors.
westbrook/griffin/adams would be interesting.
If Hill wants to get paid, he'll stay with the Jazz. Otherwise he'll be taking a fairly big pay cut.
That's what I've been thinking all along. He'd be stupid to leave the Jazz.
So who's gonna start the thread Welcome to SA Kyle Lowry
Won't happen but this would be an interesting team nonetheless:
LOL. Lemarcus "Win Now" Aldridge.
Wonder if the Rockets or someone else leaked it to scare Paul off the Spurs' scent?
If Suns (or Nuggets, Kings) are desperate enough to offer Millsap max, even for 3 years, he definitely won't be a Spur. Think they'd only offer that for a superstar.
Looking more and more like Spurs will do nothing of consequence, with possible exception of Hill, if market value is less than projected and he's willing to take discount.
Would be worst possible outcome. Disgruntled Aldridge, antiquated style of play, fools gold regular season, 2nd round ceiling, followed by overrated '18 flexibility, when only possibly attainable star free agent is Cousins, who they more than likely wouldn't touch with 10 foot pole.
If they could reach Lowry and Milsap, it would be amazing
spurs just need to find a dumb GM and dupe his ass....plenty of times this season alone we have seen tier trades for players that are actually impact players. Boogie for trash, Butler for peanuts, CP3 for role players, etc. Spurfans need to be patient and not expect everything to be done before FA even begins
Looks like it, unfortunately, but we'll see.
All better players, with more term remaining and even though return may have seemed underwhelming relative to that, consider the cir stances of Cousins and Paul. If former wasn't so volatile and latter wasn't about to leave for nothing, they'd have went for much more.
Aldridge is not the type re-building teams like Nuggets or Kings would likely view as type of veteran to have leading young team and he'd likely be disgruntled and leave latter in a year anyway.
I know how Spurs operate. If they can't get suitable replacement or significant young asset(s), they'll more than likely retain him, pretend they're contenders again, lose him for nothing in a year and have flexibility . . . to chase no one of significance.
Why? That team still won't know how to win games.
well, we would have to wait and see
Uh, I guess. There's not a single player on that team I'd really worry about.
Yeah, I think the days of the Spurs doing that are behind us. Not exactly a lot of GM's looking to make trades with the Spurs and get laughed at afterwards. A lot of bull gets talked on ST, but I think that phenomenon is real. George Hill for Kawhi AND some "ballast" (currently on the roster)? Not a lot of people want those kinds of articles written about them.
Isaiah Thomas is gone. It's just a shame that Phildo couldn't have done a deal as a parting shot to the Knicks.
Live footage of Paul George trying to get out of Indiana
I heard on nba radio today saying that isiah is a dark horse candidate to get the knicks gm job. Wtf? That's insane if the knicks are even considering rehiring him.
They have the worst owner in sports. Not surprising.
missed opportunities for the spurs.
seems like they'd rather rest on their laurels.
i had the same reaction.
isiah already said he's happy doing what he's doing though.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)