Would you trade LMA for DeAndre Jordan, straight up?

[Mikeanaro]

DeMonkey wont last a minute under Pop´s system, too dumb.

[tmtcsc]

No, I don't want his salary. I'd rather give Aldridge away and take the cap space.

[therealtruth]

bottom line is whatever happens with LMA, the Spurs will lose some overall value - there's no hiding how bad he was in the post season and other teams have smelled the blood already. So if you are set to lose some value might as well just trade straight up for whatever you can get that you know will have more balls and close talent

The other options is making LMA be the 3rd guy. For instance the Lakers struggled when Odom was the 2nd guy but when they got Gasol he flourished in that 3rd guy role.

[UNT Eagles 2016]

Odom could still back Harden down in the post. Even today.

Not today. Odom is brain dead. Drug OD'd early October 2015

[baseline bum]

Not today. Odom is brain dead. Drug OD'd early October 2015

He did this interview a few days ago

[Laughing Gravy]

You guys are forgetting the only man that can make him unstoppable....Chip Engellend...

[MannyIsGod]

I'm not sure. I do think he'd be an interesting defensive anchor but I"m not sure the Spurs have anyone on the roster currently that could help him have any type of offensive utility.

Either way if Blake is staying in LA as reports indicate, I don't think they are trading DAJ.

[SpurOutofTownFan]

The other options is making LMA be the 3rd guy. For instance the Lakers struggled when Odom was the 2nd guy but when they got Gasol he flourished in that 3rd guy role.

Yes that SHOULD be another option but I'm not sure he will go for it. It's tough

[Clipper Nation]

No deal. Nice try, Spurfan.

[DPG21920]

How many years does he have left? Like 2? It's a big yes either way though. I can't believe people could stomach another year of LMGay.

Why? SA was a good team with LMA whether people want to attribute any of that to him or not.

[Raven]

hm... toss up tbh

[DAF86]

As a last resource move, yes. Anything but keeping LA, tbh.

[DAF86]

Why? SA was a good team with LMA whether people want to attribute any of that to him or not.

Because we would be an even better team without having to throw the ball into the block 20 times per game so that an inefficient player can make an inefficient play, tbh.

[TimDunkem]

Because we would be an even better team without having to throw the ball into the block 20 times per game so that an inefficient player can make an inefficient play, tbh.

Get ready to see more of that again, especially with Porker out and Patty locking up playing time since Patty can't even run an offense.