Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Hopefully, they have more info than what was publicly reported by Crowdstrike. Their evidence for attribution to Russia wasn't very compelling.

Given the breadth and access that the NSA has it's a certainty they do.

[TSA]

So now you are going to trash your own report? Logical consistency is not your strong suit.

So when you want something you laud the medium certainty of the report. When you don't want something, you make up stories about how the "security industry" laughs at it.

You're so full of .

I've trashed it since it's release. That pesky ignore feature has you playing catch up.

Also, you forgot to add more NSA attribution beyond the ODNI

[TSA]

Via the tools used sure but there are other ways to trace the source particularly for an en y like the NSA who has their thumb on the telecom industry as outlined by Snowden.

Explain the CIA's Umbrage in your own words.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

I've trashed it since it's release. That pesky ignore feature has you playing catch up.

Also, you forgot to add more NSA attribution beyond the ODNI

You try to have it both ways. Refer to it when it suits your argument and then disclaim it when it doesn't. It's sophistry. No reason to take you seriously.

You do not understand the role of the DNI.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Explain the CIA's Umbrage in your own words.

you think that leak is the totality of it.

[TSA]

You try to have it both ways. Refer to it when it suits your argument and then disclaim it when it doesn't. It's sophistry. No reason to take you seriously.

You do not understand the role of the DNI.

I've never tried to have it both ways. I've on the report from the start. The NSA's moderate confidence in a lackluster and laughable report only bolsters my point.

Convince me the ODNI report that was 75% about RT news reports was not laughable.

[TSA]

you think that leak is the totality of it.

Totality of what exactly?

Umbrage is specific to the topic at hand. Vault 7 in its entirety is a whole other thread.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

I've never tried to have it both ways. I've on the report from the start. The NSA's moderate confidence in a lackluster and laughable report only bolsters my point.

Convince me the ODNI report that was 75% about RT news reports was not laughable.

We both know you cherry picked the medium one and ignored the high confidence conclusions. I do find it amusing that is what stuck out in your mind though. I went ahead and quoted the ones you ignored to outline your attempt at deception.

I have no desire to try and convince you. If you want to make arguments then I will argue the issue but convincing you is a waste of time. You're intellectually lazy, pigheaded, and dumb. Taking the time to explain topics of even an intermediate level is just tedious so I pass.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Totality of what exactly?

Umbrage is specific to the topic at hand. Vault 7 in its entirety is a whole other thread.

If you know what that selection is and cannot understand what I mean by a greater totality then you are as dumb as I think you are. If someone else wants an explanation then fine but your ignorance is not worth the time to fix.

[boutons_deux]

Richard Clarke


“That’s why he’s not investigating it!” Clarke exclaimed. “That’s why he’s not doing all the things we need to do to make sure it can’t happen again… This is the 21st century equivalent to having Russians land Marines on the Jersey Shore. They invaded our country. They invaded our political system and they won. And he doesn’t care.”


http://www.rawstory.com/2017/06/russ...e+Raw+Story%29

[djohn2oo8]

[djohn2oo8]

[djohn2oo8]

Reck

[djohn2oo8]

[spurraider21]

is this boom?

[djohn2oo8]

is this boom?

Yes. Very bad night for team treason

[pgardn]

I learned from the articles that many people were looking for Hillary Clinton's hacked emails.

[TSA]

We both know you cherry picked the medium one and ignored the high confidence conclusions. I do find it amusing that is what stuck out in your mind though. I went ahead and quoted the ones you ignored to outline your attempt at deception.

I have no desire to try and convince you. If you want to make arguments then I will argue the issue but convincing you is a waste of time. You're intellectually lazy, pigheaded, and dumb. Taking the time to explain topics of even an intermediate level is just tedious so I pass.

You won't argue the issue and shy away from key components when pressed.

[djohn2oo8]

I learned from the articles that many people were looking for Hillary Clinton's hacked emails.

And Russians discussing getting it to Trump's NSA pick.

[TSA]

I learned from the articles that many people were looking for Hillary Clinton's hacked emails.

I too was looking for Clinton emails. Maybe I'll write an article.

[pgardn]

And Russians discussing getting it to Trump's NSA pick.

Russians gave these to many people. Did the NSA chief request them from the Russians after asking the Russians to illegally gather them?

[TSA]

[djohn2oo8]

Russians gave these to many people. Did the NSA chief request them from the Russians after asking the Russians to illegally gather them?

Yes you moron. Why were the Russians discussing how to send it to Flynn? Bannon? Conaway? Just stop

[djohn2oo8]

Not even counting that Trump publicly told the Russians to hack Hillary

ing dip

[Reck]

Russians gave these to many people. Did the NSA chief request them from the Russians after asking the Russians to illegally gather them?

Ok, so?

The purported article by the wsj name names. People that are currently working for Trump.

It remains to be seen if those people recieved and distributed said do ents to discredit Hillary.