Reply With Quote
You say Kushner Donald every chance Melania give him. All make sense now. She give Kushner every chance to Donald since she reject Donald.
Hammerin' that thing like trout meat every chance she'll permit it.
You say Kushner Donald every chance Melania give him. All make sense now. She give Kushner every chance to Donald since she reject Donald.
Your words. Jared Donald in bungholio so Donald give him many jobs including blow and hand.
Sessions is discussing Mueller's job publicly despite recusal.
http://www.politico.com/blogs/under-...r-probe-240169
Did he do Mueller damnable dirt? Should we tar and feather or public execution? Give us the skinny Luzzy.
as melodrama goes that was pretty weak. I can see why you typically go for memes, gifs and youtubes.
Aw, you whiny baby just like Trump. Can dish out not take.
"Towards the end of one of our conversations, Smith made his pitch. He said that his team had been contacted by someone on the “dark web”; that this person had the emails from Hillary Clinton’s private email server (which she had subsequently deleted), and that Smith wanted to establish if the emails were genuine. If so, he wanted to ensure that they became public prior to the election. What he wanted from me was to determine if the emails were genuine or not."
"In the end, I never saw the actual materials they’d been given, and to this day, I don’t know whether there were genuine emails, or whether Smith and his associates were deluding themselves."
I don't see any confirmation Smith ever received them. I haven't read much of Smith's actual story either so I may have missed it. Got any other links confirming Smith actually received the emails?
= wrong team of nutsPalmer Report
The Guardian Just Revealed Chilling Details Of Russia’s Pro-Trump Fake News
investigators look into how the Internet was used to plant false stories in social media and communicate fake news to “alt-right” websites intended to damage Hillary Clinton.
“The spread of Russian-made fake news stories aimed at discrediting Hillary Clinton on social media is emerging as an important line of inquiry in multiple investigations into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Moscow, reports The Guardian, a UK news outlet.
“Investigators are looking into whether Trump supporters and far-right websites coordinated with Moscow over the release of fake news,”continues The Guardian’s report, “including stories implicating Clinton in murder or pedophilia, or paid to boost those stories on Facebook.”
at least 1,000 “paid internet trolls working out of a facility in Russia” turned out a stream of anti-Clinton fake news sites during the heat of the presidential campaign,
The investigators are particularly interested in how fake news stories that supported Trump, reported CNN on June 16, “pinpointed in key areas of the Rust Belt states that ultimately flipped from blue to red – and helped Trump secure the White House.”
some areas of Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania were being flooded with “misinformation” about “Hillary Clinton’s illness or Hillary Clinton stealing money from the State Department or other,” reported CNN.
“It completely blanked out any of the back and forth that was actually going on in the campaign,” said Warner.
Warner also raised questions about whether the Russians on their own had the knowledge and sophistication to know exactly which precincts to attack, or whether the Russians and their allies had help from Americans working on behalf of Trump.
“It is a wide-ranging investigation that is examing the unusually large number of contacts between Trump associates and Russian officials during the campaign,” reports The Guardian, “as well as the possibility that the Kremlin has personal or financial leverage over members in the Trump camp, including the president himself, according to his own remarks on Twitter.”
John Mattes, who worked on digital efforts for Bernie Sanders during the campaign from San Diego, told The Guardian that the fake news flood really began after March 2016,
“In a 30-day period,” says Mattes, “dozens of full-blown sites appeared overnight, running full level productions posts. It screamed out to me that something strange was going on.”
Mattes said he tried to “friend” some of the posters on Facebook but got no response. He said much of it could not be traced but he
“tracked 40 percent of the new postings back to Eastern Europe.”
reports the Guardian. The posts included stories that Clinton helped arm Islamic State extremists.
The posts were coming out of places in Albania and Macedonia where it made it harder to link it back to Russia.
An Albanian IT expert ran a pro-Sanders page that had 90,000 friends on Facebook.
Mattes said that if these sites were just out to get the maximum number of clicks they would have switched over time to other subjects, but they did not. Almost all of them went dark right after the election ended.
“This is a cost-effective hands-free method with no blowback to you if you are in St. Petersburg creating this product,” said Mattes.
Mattes was shaken when he read around August 10, 2016, about a dossier reportedly created by former British intelligence officer that said
the Russian digital campaign purposely set out to drive a wedge between Sanders and Clinton.
It also later discredited Sanders to push voters as the actual election neared to vote for Trump.
“We basically set ourselves up to be victims of an international cyber warfare campaign,” said Mattes. “We were pawns in this but very effective pawns.”
Clint Watts, a former FBI counter-terrorism expert, now at a think tank based at George Washington University, saw
the same pattern of fake news being sent at the same times as Mattes.
Watts found a high degree of what appears to be
coordination between the Russians and alt-right websites in the U.S.
“They synchronize so quickly it looks as if they know when a particular story was going to come out,”
Watts told the Senate Intelligence Committee, adding:
“They all parrot the Kremlin narrative.”
All of this is powerful evidence that the Russians paid for a coordinated effort to damage Secretary Clinton, who the Kremlin considered unfriendly, and help Trump, who at the very least was seen as someone they could influence – if not control.
The presidential election was so close in the end that the waves of fake news and Russian-influenced misinformation may well have played a role in the election of Donald Trump.
http://washingtonjournal.com/2017/07...ump-fake-news/
Russian Official Mysteriously Owns Millions in Trump Property
Igor Zorin runs a broadcasting company in Russia that only makes him $75,000 a year. Yet somehow Zorin has bought three units in Trump condominium developments in Florida. Huh?
That’s right, according to various reports, Zorin owns three condos and one house in Florida that are reportedly worth up to $8.4 million.
Zorin started buying the condos in 2010 and all three are at Trump Palace, worth $5.4 million total. Aside from the money discrepancies, there is su ion over the fact that none of Zorin’s property purchases were made using bank financing, which clearly suggests he paid for these holdings entirely in cash.
Zorin, however, was never the original owner of the properties.
Investigations went further when Zorin appeared to have ties with Svyatoslav Mangushev, a Russian intelligence officer who also owns real estate in Miami.
His relationship with Mangushev is first found odd because of Mangushev’s part in co-founding a biker club called “Spetsnaz M.C.” with other Russian expatriates in Southern Florida. Secondly, Zorin and Mangushev have fishy ties.
“In Russia, security firms that have been linked to Mangushev have won $2.4 million worth of contracts from Zorin’s agency since 2015. In Miami, Mangushev once transferred a Florida company that owned a $1.5 million condo out of his name and into Zorin’s.
No deed of sale was recorded, meaning the price paid — if any — is unknown,”
http://www.mediaite.com/online/russian-official-mysteriously-owns-millions-in-trump-property/
Trash is going down for financial crimes.
Hey Paul Ryan, where's that Russia sanctions bill the Senate passed 98-2?
Immediately after a bill imposing tougher sanctions on Russia and limiting Donald Trump’s ability to lift them passed the Senate with overwhelming support last month, House Speaker
Paul Ryan and his leadership team buried it over procedural concerns, claiming the legislation should have originated in the House.
At the time, Trump officials just happened to be lobbying House lawmakers to weaken the measure.?"
The mystery is, why hasn't the Trump administration taken a forceful stand in supporting this measure, this sanctions bill?" Blumenthal said.
Blumenthal insisted that there is no question the bill has support in the House, and would be passed if the Trump administration would give it the green light.
"I think it has to do possibly with financial and business dealings, as well as the possibility that he is simply resisting the meddling investigation conducted now by the special counsel," Blumenthal said.
The bill has now gained pushback from special interest groupsin the energy sector—in particular, a special interest group with connections: Exxon Mobil Corp.
Along with other energy companies, Exxon is arguing that it could hurt their bottom line if it affects their joint ventures with certain Russian partners.
Exxon’s advocacy also presents a potential political problem for the Trump administration, which has been trying to avoid conflict-of-interest questions involving Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, the oil giant’s former chief executive.
Mr. Tillerson, who has promised to recuse himself from matters involving Exxon, hasn’t explicitly spoken out against the sanctions bill, but last month urged Congress not to take any actions that tie the administration’s hands.
Well, this is a shocker—Tillerson doing the bidding of his Exxon buddies who are lining up with the Russians, while Paul Ryan looks the other way and Trump meets with Russian President Vladimir Putin at the G20 with “no specific agenda.”
https://www.dailykos.com/story/2017/...28Daily+Kos%29
iow,the oligarchy doesn't GAF that Pootin ed the election, because it's always "oligarchy's wealth before and over country"
where is djohn2oo8
Trump was asked: “Will you once and for all, yes or no, say that Russia definitive interfered with the 2016 election.”
He refused to do so, saying that “it could have been other people in other countries.”
https://thinkprogress.org/trump-pola...e-c5b4c41c62c0
but Trash trashed Obama for not taking action AGAINST RUSSIA during the campaign.
Trash is ing clinically nuts.
Trump was asked: “Will you once and for all, yes or no, say that Russia definitive interfered with the 2016 election.”
He refused to do so, saying that “it could have been other people in other countries.”
https://thinkprogress.org/trump-pola...e-c5b4c41c62c0
but Trash trashed Obama for not taking action AGAINST RUSSIA during the campaign.
Trash is ing clinically nuts.
17 agencies
& O went first the other day talking about temporary loss of leadership in the U.S.. There ain't any free shots. You're gonna pay a price when you talk out of a school.Trump was asked: “Will you once and for all, yes or no, say that Russia definitive interfered with the 2016 election.”
He refused to do so, saying that “it could have been other people in other countries.”
https://thinkprogress.org/trump-pola...e-c5b4c41c62c0
but Trash trashed Obama for not taking action AGAINST RUSSIA during the campaign.
Trash is ing clinically nuts.
& T is correct here. O didn't choke. He just figured Hillary was gonna win and didn't want to disturb that eventuality.
He mopped the in' floor with her in' ass.
Thanks to all Americans supporting Mother Russia and blameless, innocent Putin as much as they support Trump.
aмерика первая
Poll: Most Americans Think Trump Did Something Wrong With Russia
A majority of Americans — about 54 percent — think President Donald Trump did something either illegal or unethical when it comes to Russia’s involvement in the U.S. election,
about a quarter think Trump did something illegal, and 29 percent think his actions were probably unethical, but didn’t break the law.
Nearly three-quarters of Republicans think Trump did not do anything wrong regarding Russia — 73 percent — with 15 percent indicating they think he did something unethical, but not illegal.
Just 4 percent of the Republicans surveyed think Trump was involved in illegal activities with Russia.
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewir...ng-with-russia
A trashing of the American press corps and Intel community in Eastern Europe of all places.
Could Putin have asked for anything more?
5:22 AM - 6 Jul 2017
https://twitter.com/chucktodd/status/882937875330981888
Trash has NO. ING.CLUE of how his equally Pootin-compromised but much smarter entourage are using him as Useful Idiot
Why speechify Warsaw? How about the USSR's "WARSAW PACT"?
MOST POLLS SAID CLINTON WOULD WINPoll: Most Americans Think Trump Did Something Wrong With Russia
A majority of Americans — about 54 percent — think President Donald Trump did something either illegal or unethical when it comes to Russia’s involvement in the U.S. election,
about a quarter think Trump did something illegal, and 29 percent think his actions were probably unethical, but didn’t break the law.
Nearly three-quarters of Republicans think Trump did not do anything wrong regarding Russia — 73 percent — with 15 percent indicating they think he did something unethical, but not illegal.
Just 4 percent of the Republicans surveyed think Trump was involved in illegal activities with Russia.
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewir...ng-with-russia
TOO BAD THEY ASKED 80 PERCENT LIBERALS
There are currently 5 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 5 guests)
Posting Permissions
