Reply With Quote
Well yeah that helps too but strong relationships matter a bunch as well. Hayward just left Utah mainly bc of Brad Stevens.
There are conflicting reports out there. Just heard he is getting 25 mil over 2 seasons with a player option on year 2
Well yeah that helps too but strong relationships matter a bunch as well. Hayward just left Utah mainly bc of Brad Stevens.
The Spurs revival was because of Kawhi. People should thank their lucky stars we traded for him.
2014 was all Kawhi, Duncan, Manu, Patty and role players.
It's $12.3 mil total.
Jeff zilgitt retracted his statement of 2 years at 12 mil a year on twitter. So yeah, at the rate of 12.3 mIL over two seasons.
Thanks. Zilgitt needs to get his together.
What's left for Derrick Rose ? Bucks ? Heat ? Spurs ?
To all you whiny posters in this thread:
todays big news for spurs nation...
itshappening.gif
If Memphis is really rebuilding, maybe instead of going after Gasol you go after Conley. He is earning something like 28 mill. Get a third team involved as it is unlikely Memphis would give up Conley to have an LMA/Marc Gasol frontline.
^^Of course if you trade for Conley, it only makes sense if you move Parker which is another reason it wouldn't happen.
Does this mean Forbes, Green, or Parker is gone?
Doubtful. Probably slated for one of the two-way spots and will spend most of his time in Austin.
That's . Wonder who Portland is giving up and what they're getting.
Yep. And the geniuses here said there was no way he jumps to the NBA - guaranteed. And the real genius who said no one else ever heard of Teodosic.
Not a good defender, but he's a PG who is really a PG. And at a good price, and shorter term.
Rockets going for the this is going to be fun '13 Lakers model
Chinook, how is it hindsight or asking Spurs to know the future when there have been people on this board who have been anti-Mills for months? Who have been anti-2007 summer plans for months? Who have been either pro-change (Paul, Hill, Holiday, anyone else) for months, who have been pro-capspace (just let the young guys play and roll it over!) for months?
And I don't know why you think retelling what's happened is some sort of compelling argument.
"See, what the Spurs wanted to do was re-sign Mills and Pau and so that's what they did!"
It's obvious what they've done, we can all see and read what they've done, people are discussing the merits of it. When you come in with your "hindsight" and "know the future" and "out of touch" schtick, you are trying to shut down discussion of ideas, consequences, the future, and possibilities instead of actually making an argument.
Sweet. Might as well give us the trophy now. Biggest signing of the summer tbh
Honestly I want to see that cluster already. It may work but if not? The meltdowns @ Cluchfans will be glorious
Last edited by TheDoctor; 07-06-2017 at 04:07 PM.
Murray an Blossomgame will be in Austin.... especially if he have anotha gm like last night. 0 for 13!!
Chris Paul in Houston made little sense, now Carmello there is insane.
Who gives a flying if people here were anti-Mills or not? The Spurs had no idea what the PG market was going to look like and really couldn't wait to find out. They knew they could get Mills for $6.8 Million and built their plan around that. ing about what Hill and Tedosic are marking is total hindsight-driven pieces of bull . It has nothing to do with whether you wanted Mills back or not. I didn't want him back, especially not at 12:01, but I get it. There were even scenarios where I would have been fine with bringing Patty back, but that's not the point. Wanting Teague, Lowry, Paul or Hill instead of Patty is fine. ing about the Spurs not knowing Hill's market was going to evaporate isn't.
Your issue is you think I'm defending re-signing Mills in and of itself. I'm not. Especially after drafting White, I don't believe they needed to secure Patty if their plan was to go after Paul. But folks like you seem to fundamentally not understand what the Spurs did and why. And you all want to act like the Spurs would have been waiting patiently on 7/4 with no PGs on the roster besides Murray and trying to leverage players into signing cheap deals. That was not going to be the case.And I don't know why you think retelling what's happened is some sort of compelling argument.
"See, what the Spurs wanted to do was re-sign Mills and Pau and so that's what they did!"
Lol, if you think the ing about Patty and the unreasonable comparisons to contracts like Hill and Tedosic is a discussion, you must talk about very little. It's just complaining over and over again. I have done nothing to stop it. Me rejecting what I believe is unreasonable criticism doesn't prevent you from typing it (obviously). That the Spurs felt like keeping Mills was a priority is definitely questionable. But why they gave him a deal at 12:01 is not. If you accept the first argument, you have no reason to question the second. IF you reject the first, the second is irrelevant.It's obvious what they've done, we can all see and read what they've done, people are discussing the merits of it. When you come in with your "hindsight" and "know the future" and "out of touch" schtick, you are trying to shut down discussion of ideas, consequences, the future, and possibilities instead of actually making an argument.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
