collapse
Republicans only having a 4 edge seat in the senate, two of which caucuses with the dems so its really more like a 2 seat edge.
Of the 33 senate seats up for election in 2018, 25 of them are Democrats' seats. Almost no way the GOP doesn't pick up senate seats in 2018.
Republicans only having a 4 edge seat in the senate, two of which caucuses with the dems so its really more like a 2 seat edge.
Reck is clearly not a political junkie
Republicans only having a 4 edge seat in the senate, two of which caucuses with the dems so its really more like a 2 seat edge.
How Bad Is the Democratic Senate Map for 2018?
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/ar...18_133823.html
Every political junkie knows the Senate map is bad for Democrats. Over half of the Democratic caucus will be up for re-election, and some of these in bents represent highly red states such as Montana, North Dakota, West Virginia, Indiana and Missouri. No party would want to go into a midterm defending a map like that.
This Is a Really Bad Democratic Map -- But It’s Not Unprecedented
When a party has a map like this one, they often lose seats.
Democratic Outcomes Range From Decent to Disastrous
The problem is when people are blinded by parties. People treat politics like it's the NFL. Defend "your guy" and run down the others just because of the letter after the name. Really can't see why anyone would register as a Republican or a Democrat.
Read the story about The Rock possibly looking at a presidential run. Really don't see much difference between history electing war hero's vs celebrities. Name recognition. I'd rather deal with the Al Franken, Reagan's of the us than career politicians.
First kid rock lyric that came to mind was:
"Got a business mind so if I lose the funk, I'll still be in the house getting paid like Trump"
They're unlikely to regain the senate but they're not going to lose seats en mass either.
Look at the special elections if you're looking for a tell. Red ruby states were within points.
You're own links always end up betarying you.Reck is clearly not a political junkie
How Bad Is the Democratic Senate Map for 2018?
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/ar...18_133823.html
Every political junkie knows the Senate map is bad for Democrats. Over half of the Democratic caucus will be up for re-election, and some of these in bents represent highly red states such as Montana, North Dakota, West Virginia, Indiana and Missouri. No party would want to go into a midterm defending a map like that.
This Is a Really Bad Democratic Map -- But It’s Not Unprecedented
When a party has a map like this one, they often lose seats.
Democratic Outcomes Range From Decent to Disastrous
Bad map...but not unpresedented.
Two way street. Trump makes things worse for republicans not better.In 2012 Democrats were competing in the exact same states that they will be next year, but they managed to gain two seats. That’s partially because of a favorable national environment -- President Obama won his second term that year. But bad Republican candidate recruitment also helped Democrats. In Missouri, Todd Akin lost to Democratic Sen. Claire McCaskill partially because of his remarks on “legitimate rape.” Indiana Republican Richard Mourdock also faced some backlash for his comments on abortion. Additionally, strong candidates in Montana, West Virginia and North Dakota were able to beat Republicans in friendly territory. That added up to a good year for Democratic Senate candidates.
Fred Thompson, Al Franken.... This is not news.
Those guys though.
What is word?
Not anus.
While we're on the subject of probability, this happened.Reck is clearly not a political junkie
How Bad Is the Democratic Senate Map for 2018?
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/ar...18_133823.html
Every political junkie knows the Senate map is bad for Democrats. Over half of the Democratic caucus will be up for re-election, and some of these in bents represent highly red states such as Montana, North Dakota, West Virginia, Indiana and Missouri. No party would want to go into a midterm defending a map like that.
This Is a Really Bad Democratic Map -- But It’s Not Unprecedented
When a party has a map like this one, they often lose seats.
Democratic Outcomes Range From Decent to Disastrous
http://www.thedailybeast.com/democra...atehouse-races
In typical TSA fashion he ignores the hard facts and makes up his own.
And when did I say I was a political junkie? You said it, not me re .
Ingoring:
http://www.thedailybeast.com/democra...atehouse-races
You ignored the entire article I posted outlining how grim 2018 looks for senate Dems.In typical TSA fashion he ignores the hard facts and makes up his own.
And when did I say I was a political junkie? You said it, not me re .
Ingoring:
http://www.thedailybeast.com/democra...atehouse-races
You wanted an example of how you keep repeating yourself over and over until the other person just gets tired of your word game?You ignored the entire article I posted outlining how grim 2018 looks for senate Dems.
Well there you go.
You ignored the entire article I posted outlining how grim 2018 looks for senate Dems.
Yesterday you said my schtick was answering questions with questions.You wanted an example of how you keep repeating yourself over and over until the other person just gets tired of your word game?
Well there you go.
Today you say my schtick is repeating myself over and over, which you didn't even get right because what you quoted were not the same at all.
Do I have two schticks now or are you just re ed?
Repeating yourself covers repeating questions over and over again.
In one day you've done it here and with Pavlov. You're a dumbass who cant come up with an original thought to save your life.
Your shtick is to come up with a prepared rightwing talking point, then have the other person rebuke it, then you go on 2-3 pages parroting the same because you have nothing else.
make no mistake i vote straight party democrat right now and will continue to do so as long as they remain the only viable opposition to the party of donald trump and evangelical intervention into my and my womans .Oh that's right, we're all independents on ST
Repeating means the same. What you quoted wasn't me repeating myself. And Chump's schtick wasn't repeating questions it was just responding to questions with questions.
You're a dumbass who doesn't know the definition of repeat.
And now I apparently have a 3rd schtick
You sure play the schtick pretty well here
That doesn't soundlike the Democratic party to me
Yeah this was you last november
You're being owned by several people in one day so I understand if you're having a difficult time understanding logic.Repeating means the same. What you quoted wasn't me repeating myself. And Chump's schtick wasn't repeating questions it was just responding to questions with questions.
You're a dumbass who doesn't know the definition of repeat.
And now I apparently have a 3rd schtick
It doesn't matter if its questions or the same posts. The end result is the same. you repeat yourself until the other person gets enough of your boring shtick.
Refer to post 40 on this thread.
And Pavlov just ed your brain so bad you kept repeating yourself without end.
The only way to counter chumpdumper is to be chumpdumper. I learned this a long time ago.You're being owned by several people in one day so I understand if you're having a difficult time understanding logic.
It doesn't matter if its questions or the same posts. The end result is the same. you repeat yourself until the other person gets enough of your boring shtick.
Refer to post 40 on this thread.
And Pavlov just ed your brain so bad you kept repeating yourself without end.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
