Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions

[TSA]

would need some context on this... also i dont know if i can just take this guy's word at face value. "the idea of an information economy did not exist at the time the laws were written." do i just believe that because some guy says so? i dont know the answer to that, but this would need some research to back each of these claims.

If you have time to squeeze in some research before the bar give it a shot, if not no big deal.

[spurraider21]

If you have time to squeeze in some research before the bar give it a shot, if not no big deal.

highly unlikely. i take intermittent 5-10 minute breaks to banter on ST, i dont have time for a legal assignment

oh, it was just some guy on ar15.com? ... i assumed you at least pulled the quote from some legal analyst/expert

[RandomGuy]

why do you keep quoting him in comic sans font?

comic

Because comic sans is the go to font for things you don't take seriously.

[TSA]

I am quoting someone pointing out the moral bankruptcy of Trump, and by extension the Republican party. Does that bother you?

You are confusing your quotes here. Take a deep breath and go back to the original quoted post.

[TSA]

No. There are multiple ongoing investigations that have not completed.

Can you show me a completed investigation that concluded that no crimes were committed?

I'm not asking specifically to this. Anyone in all of US campaign history?

[RandomGuy]

Can you show me a completed investigation [into Trumps campaign and current presidency] that concluded that no crimes were committed?

I'm not asking specifically to this. Anyone in all of US campaign history?

So the investigations into Trump et al. haven't completed. Got it.

Thanks for answering my question directly, and without evading. It makes you so much more credible.

[djohn2oo8]

his emails

[djohn2oo8]

[RandomGuy]

I am quoting someone pointing out the moral bankruptcy of Trump, and by extension the Republican party. Does that bother you?

You are confusing your quotes here. Take a deep breath and go back to the original quoted post.

So Trump and his family's skeeziness does bother you. Good.

[Reck]

An 80 year old man using the term "bro."

try hards

[djohn2oo8]

[spurraider21]

[TSA]

So Trump and his family's skeeziness does bother you. Good.

Why did you quote Rob Goldstone's email and then jump straight to this? You are all over the place today.

[TSA]

So the investigations into Trump et al. haven't completed. Got it.

Thanks for answering my question directly, and without evading. It makes you so much more credible.

You can't call out a question not being answered while simultaneously doing just that

[Pavlov]

You can't call out a question not being answered while simultaneously doing just that

That all you do.

[Reck]

Schiff is my . I sure hope he runs in 2020.

[RandomGuy]

Why did you quote Rob Goldstone's email and then jump straight to this? You are all over the place today.

Because the article said something I thought was important. Too much randomness?

[TSA]

Because the article said something I thought was important. Too much randomness?

Sure. And I asked you a question about it and you responded with something having nothing to do with what you found important in the article.

[RandomGuy]

You can't call out a question not being answered while simultaneously doing just that

Sure I can.

You deflect all the time by trying to change the subject by asking a question in response to being asked something you don't want to answer.

I will ignore that all the day long, because if you can't be decent enough to answer something posed to you honestly and directly, I will abso- ing-lutely not feel any obligation whatsoever to answer questions posed by someone who will not be decent enough to do the one action that matters in any discussion worth having.

Quid.

Pro.

Quo.

[TSA]

his emails

I'd have a beer with Kasowitz

[RandomGuy]

Sure. And I asked you a question about it and you responded with something having nothing to do with what you found important in the article.

I am not sure what you want answered. If you want an answer, you will have to re-state the question.

[TSA]

Sure I can.

You deflect all the time by trying to change the subject by asking a question in response to being asked something you don't want to answer.

I will ignore that all the day long, because if you can't be decent enough to answer something posed to you honestly and directly, I will abso- ing-lutely not feel any obligation whatsoever to answer questions posed by someone who will not be decent enough to do the one action that matters in any discussion worth having.

Quid.

Pro.

Quo.

You ask stupid ing questions I can't possibly answer and then cry about it.

What about all the other meetings? What was discussed and passed back and forth in those meetings?

why won't you answer

[TSA]

I am not sure what you want answered. If you want an answer, you will have to re-state the question.

Don't worry about it I won't hold your feet to the fire.

[djohn2oo8]

lol Trump just changed his story about knowing of Jr's meeting

[Pavlov]

Until TSA get new marching orders, response to Trump/Russia issue be some combination of following:













He not able to explain any of it but still fun to ask him.