^^^He wins win OR lose. And you know what,,,He, + everybody with 1/2 brain knows it. Has Media all pissed off, but, they can't play both sides of that win/loss amalgam...so they soldier on.
Trump? He ain't no country preacher, not by a long shot he ain't.
When is next Trumpcare rally?
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...-chairman-says
Trump Is Good for Twitter, Doesn't Deserve Ban, Chairman Says
Twitter Inc.’s executive chairman said the social-media platform shouldn’t ban President Donald Trump, pushing back against complaints from users who say some of his tweets amount to cyberbullying and violate the company’s terms of service.
“It’s good to have him talk on Twitter,” Omid Kordestani said in an interview at Sun Valley, the Idaho resort town that hosts an annual confab of technology and media moguls and political luminaries. This year the crowd includes Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner, who arrived Wednesday and are scheduled to leave Friday.
Trump, who frequently uses Twitter to broadcast his thoughts in 140 characters, has drawn criticism for many of his tweets, including a recent video depicting him beating up a wrestling opponent with the CNN logo superimposed on his victim’s head. A series of tweets disparaging the personal appearance and intellect of TV host Mika Brzezinski also fueled complaints. Twitter’s rules allow the company to suspend accounts for violent threats, gender-based attacks and other forms of abuse and harassment.
Representative Keith Ellison, a Minnesota Democrat, and Seth Abramson, a University of New Hampshire professor and frequent Trump critic, are among those who have called for the president to be taken off Twitter.
Trump also uses Twitter for other purposes, including recaps of his discussions with other world leaders, his takes on current events and praise or disdain for companies. The president has 33.7 million followers, up from around 24 million at the time of his inauguration.
Twitter, under pressure after posting its first quarterly revenue decline since going public in 2013, has found that accounts like Trump’s are a potential source of growth. Average monthly users increased 6 percent to 328 million in the first quarter from a year earlier, in part because of “new and resurrected users following more news and political accounts,” especially in the U.S., the company said in April.
Anthony Noto, the company’s chief operating officer, has said that since people go to Twitter to see what’s happening, it’s easier for the social media company to deliver on its mission if influential people like Trump start discussions there.
“We’d love it if every world leader used Twitter as their primary mechanism to talk to their cons uencies,” Noto, who’s also attending the Sun Valley conference, said in a Bloomberg Television interview in May. “The more that happens, the better we are going to be at showing what’s going on in the world.”
why would he get banned?
http://www.breitbart.com/big-governm...el-ban-ruling/Attorney General Jeff Sessions has asked the U.S. Supreme Court for clarification on its ruling, after U.S. District Judge Derrick Watson modified his original order in an attempt to subvert the ban.
From Breitbart:
Attorney General Jeff Sessions went directly to the Supreme Court on Friday, asking for clarification of its June 26 travel ban decision and an immediate stay of U.S. District Judge Derrick Watson’s July 13 ruling that modified his original injunction that stopped Executive Order 13780, which placed a temporary ban on all refugees and a temporary travel ban on residents of six Middle Eastern countries.
That original injunction was largely overturned in the Court’s June 26 decision. Watson’s July 13 ruling significantly scaled back President Trump’s Supreme Court victory.
Late Friday, Acting Solicitor General Ken Wall filed a motion at the Supreme Court asking for the justices to clarify who qualifies as a close family member. If the Court is unwilling to go there, Wall alternatively asked the Court at minimum to stay Watson’s ruling while the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) appeals his latest decision.
“The district court’s interpretation of this Court’s June 26, 2017, stay ruling distorts this Court’s decision and upends the equitable balance this Court struck,” the DOJ said in its motion, citing two particular errors in Watson’s decision.
First, “The district court’s categorical holding that the Order may not be applied to any refugee applicant as to whom the Department of State has obtained a contractual commitment from a resettlement agency — which includes every refugee permitted to enter the United States — effectively eviscerates this Court’s ruling partially staying the injunction as to Sections 6(a) and 6(b),” the DOJ argued.
Second, “the district court’s sweeping interpretation of ‘close familial relationship’ to encompass a wide range of distant relatives — including cousins, uncles, and siblings-in-law — effectively eliminates the ‘close’ requirement and has no basis in this Court’s ruling or the INA,” the DOJ continued.
Sessions also played it safe by appealing Watson’s July 13 ruling modifying his injunction.
“Out of an abundance of caution, to ensure that there is no impediment to this Court’s prompt resolution of this issue, the government has also filed today a notice of appeal of the district court’s decision modifying its injunction,” the motion stated.
By going directly to the Supreme Court for clarification, Sessions outmaneuvered both Watson, the federal judge in Hawaii, and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which had given Watson a “roadmap” for his July 13 decision when it ruled earlier this month against his previous decision that requested clarification from the Supreme Court.
Now, Attorney General Sessions is asking the Supreme Court for that clarification.
Sessions’ move surprised most legal observers, who expected him to first appeal Watson’s July 13 decision to the Ninth Circuit, which would probably have affirmed Watson, and then appealed that decision to the Supreme Court.
Instead, Sessions is asking the Supreme Court to do what the Ninth Circuit ruled Judge Watson could not ask the Supreme Court to do: Clarify its decision.
“Nearly three weeks ago, this Court issued its per curiam decision partially staying the injunctions” issued by Judge Watson stopping the implementation of Executive Order 13780, the Department of Justice’s motion began.
"Trump visits own golf club."
Is this really Breaking911 story?
winner of the meme contest goes to...
I've kind of noticed that whenever Trump, or, (maybe it's just me) is feeling vulnerable & at risk he'll Tweet out of the norm. It's like he can't settle down.
wow, syria looks amazing!
surprised more people aren't going there!
won't let me copy the article
http://prntly.com/2016/03/24/breakin...-over-hillary/
The first thing he saw as President was phantom inauguration attendees.
^ really pissing off RandomGuy
worst approval rating for a potus in 70 years
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/month...social_fb_abcn
doing awesome!!!![]()
"i saw muslim refugee terrorists being dropped off in manhattan by a spaceship"
- trump
"he calls it like he sees it"
- republican re s
Try to stay in character, sock.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)