Reply With Quote
No, don't do that. Just go ahead and be vile. I'll just accept it and converse nonetheless. I made similar concession to Lump on this kind of situation and that ain't bothered me.
I enjoy your too much to just let it go.
how about we just skip to going our separate ways so i dont have to try to remember what i said that was so vile and repeat it
No, don't do that. Just go ahead and be vile. I'll just accept it and converse nonetheless. I made similar concession to Lump on this kind of situation and that ain't bothered me.
I enjoy your too much to just let it go.
Collude with Russia so good for democracy.
Agreed.
Didn't stop Trump from accusing Hillary of criminal behavior back in the campaign though.
Yeah, when Trump lock her up?
Christy Cream trolling the Trumps.
Against Kamala Harris? EasilyWhere you been Mitch?
8 years, right?
Still think Trump won't make it to 4 years?
More than ever.Against Kamala Harris? Easily
Still think Trump won't make it to 4 years?
You're part of the 30% Trump base that's ummovable. Bless your heart.
You're part of the <10% base that actually liked hillary
Bless your heart, though
What's willy nilly about accusing Trump of colluding with Russia when Uday admitted he, Cuckner, and Manafort colluded with Russia?
Yeah...no.You're part of the <10% base that actually liked hillary
Bless your heart, though
I backed a candidate I could live with. I dont follow her on twitter or have an alter of her. She's irrelevant to me now.
But not irrelevant enough to Trump or you apparently.
Lying to yourself again, Reck?Yeah...no.
I backed a candidate I could live with. I dont follow her on twitter or have an alter of her. She's irrelevant to me now.
But not irrelevant enough to Trump or you apparently.
No worries, bro
lol Manfort. NY state crimes are unpardonable.
oh look, fox news has no problem promoting a typical "elitist liberal academic" as long as he says something they like!
So now you can read minds? Interesting.Lying to yourself again, Reck?
No worries, bro
I dont see the point of lying on an anonymous online board but whatever makes you sleep at night. Like when you defended Trump when that pussy video came out.
also, the cons ution doesn't define treason as narrowly as he suggests (he says its ONLY for levying war against the US)... although i'm not sure at this point we could legally define russia as an "enemy" pursuant to this clause, but i'm not sure either way
They've been using him a lot lately and using him as a prop to paint all liberals are crazies who rush for the pitch fork.also, the cons ution doesn't define treason as narrowly as he suggests (he says its ONLY for levying war against the US)... although i'm not sure at this point we could legally define russia as an "enemy" pursuant to this clause, but i'm not sure either way
So now you can read minds? Interesting.
I dont see the point of lying on an anonymous online board but whatever makes you sleep at night. Like when you defended Trump when that pussy video came out.Trump said bad stuff a decade ago
i just find it funny that the new spin is "ok there might have been collusion, but its not a crime!" after months of "no collusion no collusion liberal hysteria"
Excusing his filth because they were said years ago.
Who I choose to support years from now shouldn't get your panties in a wad. It's my choice. Dont get bent out of shape, bro.
And of course you view her at ude as y because she asked some hard questions instead of softballs. Such a republican thing to be.
"war" 200+ years ago was only shooting war
Of course, the "originalists" / "textualists" say the Cons ution has been dead for 200+ years (when it suits their politics, eg, Scalia, etc) so no "living" contemporary interpretation is allowed, not mentioning the fact that there was tremendous "lively" controversy of nearly item in the Cons ution, absolutely no unanimity.
cyberwar / infowar is where we are now.
Trash and accomplices colluding with Russia in Russia's cyberwar / infowar against USA to throw the election to Trash was, is treasonous.
I already know your ass will support Harris, you're already defending herExcusing his filth because they were said years ago.
Who I choose to support years from now shouldn't get your panties in a wad. It's my choice. Dont get bent out of shape, bro.
And of course you view her at ude as y because she asked some hard questions instead of softballs. Such a republican thing to be.
Real democrats are rolling in their graves at iden y politic voters like yourself
But if you are so worried of whom I might be in support of in the future I shall tell you now.
Adam Schiff should run in 2020.
Dude you have issues.I already know your ass will support Harris, you're already defending her
Real democrats are rolling in their graves at iden y politic voters like yourself
Dont pretend what I would do or not do. It's annoying.
I can tell you dont get laid much. You have control issues.
There are currently 4 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 4 guests)
Posting Permissions