If they trade him to Boston right now, in that same conferencen LeBron will be asking for a trade this summer
You trade Parker, Anderson for him. Cavs get something back to keep LeBron because they are certainly not trading him. Not a great deal for the Cavs but if Irving wants out better than nothing. Spurs keep LMA have a deeper team to compete with Warriors. I don't think Cavs accept that but it's worth a shot, Parker isn't suiting up till January.
You're the only one seeing this the way I see it. I think NY and the Spurs are the EARLY possibilities but I think they might end up standing pat. Maybe not though, since I really think this is based on Kyrie knowing Lebron is going to GTFO next year.
Nah - very few players have no trade clauses and you always see this. Teams trading for a player that doesn't want to be there is bad news. If that were the case CLE would just keep Kyrie since he's under contract.
It's the same thing. He would just march in and ask for a trade and then the team is stuck and they gave up assets for him.
We need a PG for God's sake!!
This is wrong though. A team isn't going to trade for a player who doesn't want to be there.
Draft picks. Younger talent that an develop. I mean, to get Kevin Love, they gave up a number one pick. That was what T-Wolves required. If I was Cavs, I'd want a team w/ a low draft pick. Plus, Kyrie has no leverage. They can trade him to anyone.
Valid point, and CLE holds the ultimate King's X power, but you also gotta wonder what incentive they have in keeping a player who doesn't want to be there or for a team not on his list trading for a player who doesn't want to be there either?
Yeah man, I mean next season. This is about building for the next five to eight seasons. Cleveland can have anything they want outside of Kawhi.Who the cares?
Didnt read anything about him wanting to win, read he wants a bigger role
Ya - who knows. Trading stars and for stars is rarely swift and easy. we heard Paul George and Butler rumors for years before they actually did something.
The only reason I think this is legit and may be resolved soon is that Lebron may very well be leaving. You better trade Kyrie now and get something solid to at least attempt to appease Lebron. Then if Lebron still does leave at least you have some talent still.
Plus if you dont trade Kyrie and Lebron leaves, Kyrie's value goes down because now they know you have to trade him.
Has not signed signed yet, so a S&T is still possible (but I don't think that he is going anywhere).
Love' in every minute of this...
Uh, if that's true, it's bad. Kawhi and Pop run the Spurs. Kyrie would be a #2, same as he is w/ Cavs. But he would have the ball more given LeBron played PG.
that would be epic, unload an incoming ty deal for patty, dump LMA and gain Irving? Sign me up
Well...there's one but it would be insane.
Kyrie isn't the best PG out there but he has the mentality and he is clutch. I would punt the season and trade LMA's soft ass for him and try to reload the front court next year.
Oh wait. Does CLE have a GM? Maybe it's easy pickings time.
It's happening! Kyrie will pitch LeBron next summer!
True, but Im not sure you can do S&T with simultaneously trading others too? I'll have to look that up.
that would be epic, unload an incoming ty deal for patty, dump LMA and gain Irving? Sign me up
I would really prefer to keep LMA.
Danny + Mills + Murray if possible. Clears out the logjam at PG and creates no hole at PF. LMA as 3rd option = good.
I'm not sure why Kyrie wants to play with Kawhi if he doesn't like playing with Lebron. The meltdown that is on it's way after this falls through is going to be amazing.
he will end up in mia or ny they have what cavs want and more then what spurs can offer tbh
SA would have a true 3 stars with Kawhi + Kyrie + LMA
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
