How many hints do you really need to get that's not his alt?
Let us proceed...
... this is why you shouldnt watch cable tv news tbh
but speaking of changing stories
0:45
Classic narcissist, tbh
And yet you like to suck his daily.
That Chris Cuomo. I hate that SOB, but, when he ain't on, it's worth . There is no sense to watching it. It's garbage then. Like when Tapper ain't there. Forget it. And lately they're gone more than in.
GrossAnd yet you like to suck his daily.
reading the news is far superior than watching on TV. you can get much more information in much less time... and you dont have talking heads trying to improvise and inevitably making factual errors every few minutes. print is more thoroughly reviewed and edited
its not perfect but the you watch on TV is probably the worst place to be informed (well second worst, that would be talk radio)
You're right, but, it's fun gettin' riled by those bas s.
But you keep on bringing up Chalupa Fusion.
I'm intrigued by a Mexican food being a Ukrainian surname.
Not enough for it to make any sense.
Trump’s Son-In-Law Kushner Just Made A Shady Edit To His Financial Disclosure Form
One hundred million dollars simply slipped Jared Kushner’s mind.
The Wall Street Journal reports that Kushner just revised his disclosure forms to
add 77 assets that he previously failed to mention.
They included real estate, bonds, and an art collection among others and could total over $100 million in value.
“That strikes me as a lot,” Don Fox – a former ethics office general counsel
Kushner also failed to mention his involvement in Cadre, a real-estate tech startup connected to Goldman Sachs as well as the billionaire and perennial far-right bugaboo George Soros.
Kushner omitted the investment, which could be worth between $5 million to $25 million.
http://washingtonjournal.com/2017/07...closure-forms/
Donald with an all time classic meltdown on Twitter this morning.
So you don't post it?
So you don't know how to go to twitter?
Daddy Vladdy aint gonna be happy
"Simpson’s attorney has asserted that his client will invoke his Fifth Amendment rights in response to the subpoena," Grassley and Feinstein said."
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017...ead-fifth.html
In Legal Leap, Profs Claim Trump Could Face Criminal Charges for Pardons
University of Chicago Law Professors Eric Posner and Daniel Hemel are weighing in, saying that if President Trump wanted to issue pardons for his family and friends, he could do it, but it could land him in a world of trouble.
letting Trump absolve “anyone for any crime at any time,” there is reason to believe that abusing that power could result in criminal charges.
the professor takes a small jump from there to say that issuing a pardon for “corrupt” purposes—like for a cover-up—could qualify as obstruction of justice, a crime that could result in not just impeachment, but criminal charges against POTUS.
It would surely be difficult to bring a solid case against Trump for this, for two reasons.
One, which the professors bring up, is that “prosecutors and courts would give wide la ude to a president in evaluating his pardon decisions.”
The other is that there’s still no known evidence (NOT YET!
http://lawnewz.com/legal-analysis/in-legal-leap-profs-claim-trump-could-face-criminal-charges-for-pardons/
iow, if there is no crime, why would a Pres want to pardon? Pardon a Federal-crimeless person?
btw, Pres can only pardon for Federal crimes. He cannot pardon for state crimes.
If no one is proven guilty or even charged, a preemptive pardon makes no sense, except in Trash addles brain.
Why impeachment won't happen with Repug Congress and Senate
Robert Reich: The 10 Steps to Impeach a President
It all revolves around Article I Sections 2 and 3 of the Cons ution, and rules in the House and the Senate implementing those provisions.
Step 1. It starts in the House Judiciary Committee, when a majority of the member vote in favor of what’s called an “inquiry of impeachment” resolution.
Step 2. That resolution goes to the full House of Representatives where a majority has to vote in favor. And then votes to authorize and fund a full investigation by the Judiciary Committee into whether sufficient grounds exist for impeachment.
Step 3. The House Judiciary Committee investigates. That investigation doesn’t have to be from scratch. It can rely on data and conclusions of other investigations undertaken by, say, the FBI.
Step 4: A majority of the Judiciary Committee members decides there are sufficient grounds for impeachment, and the Committee issues a “Resolution of Impeachment,” setting forth specific allegations of misconduct in one or more articles of impeachment.
Step 5: The full House then considers that Resolution and votes in favor of it – as a whole or on each article separately. The full House isn’t bound by the Committee’s work. The House may vote to impeach even if the Committee doesn’t recommend impeachment.
Step 6: The matter then goes to the Senate for a trial. The House’s Resolution of Impeachment becomes in effect the charges in this trial.
Step 7: The Senate issues a summons to the president, who is now effectively the defendant, informing him of the charges and the date by which he has to answer them. If the president chooses not to answer or appear, it’s as if he entered a “not guilty” plea.
Step 8 is the trial in the Senate. In that trial, those who are representing the House – that is, the prosecution – and counsel for the president, both make opening arguments. They then introduce evidence and put on witnesses as in any trial. Witnesses are subject to examination and cross-examination. The trial is presided over by the chief justice of the Supreme Court – who has the authority to rule on evidentiary questions or may put such questions to a vote of the Senate. The House managers and counsel for the president then make closing arguments.
Step 9: The Senate meets in closed session to deliberate.
Step 10: The Senate returns in open session to vote on whether to convict the president on the articles of impeachment. Conviction requires a two-thirds vote by the Senate. Conviction on one or more articles of impeachment results in removal from office. Such a conviction also disqualifies the now former president from holding any other public office. And it doesn’t bar additional legal proceedings against that former president, and punishment.
So there you have it–the 10 steps that must all take place to impeach the president.
It may come in handy.
http://www.alternet.org/right-wing/1...each-president
Clinton impeached. Not Trump.
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
