Reply With Quote
Don't know. If so, that's trending in the right direction.
Why the do these odds matter? Only the wishes of a handful GMs matter.
Don't know. If so, that's trending in the right direction.
Because some Dumb s on the internet say so?
I find it amusing anyone attempts to handicap these things.
"...Spurs running 6th, but moving up on the outside at the quarter pole..."
'Starting'?
Yea I guess it's been all hearsay up until this point.
not a coincidence that this happens to be the first day that Altman takes over as GM.
When has Alex ever broke anything? Not saying he hasn't just asking.
He makes it seem like Kyrie is a FA..
He has to be traded and Wiggins without question has to be involved. I'm not exactly seeing the logic with Minnesota...they signed Teague to starter $$ yet would have to trade him in December? Are they gonna start Teague-Irving at the 1-2 until then? Just don't see it at all tbh
Ah yes, gonna be another 100+ page thread without Kyrie ever setting foot in San Antonio. It ain't gonna happen. No one wants to come here.
he wants to come here. the problem is that he is not a FA. totally different situation. SA likely lacks the assets the cavs would want.
Except he said he wants to come here. Lol idiot
"...Spurs running 6th, but moving up on the outside at the quarter pole..."
The only team from Kyrie's list that make more sense than San Antonio is Minnesota because they can do a straight up deal with Cleveland. With San Antonio, a third team would have to be in the mix since they don't want Aldridge and you'd most certainly have to move him to get it done.
No one else makes sense to me unless they completely disregard Kyrie's wishes and send him somewhere else.
How does Minnesota make sense??
IMO the only team on the list that makes sense is Miami...
A deal centered around Wiggins is the deal that's been brought up time and time again.
And lol the consensus is that Miami makes the LEAST amount of sense. Riley does not want to do a deal with Cleveland, brah.
it has been brought up but i always see that it gets shot down because minny is reluctant to give him up. that could change, of course.
This what we f$&kn get for having over twenty 50 win seasons smFh. No trade assets....
Ok let's say Wolves trade Wiggins which I agree has to be the case...
Minnesota gonna start Teague/Irving back court?? Pay them both roughly 20M per for a non existent defense and just a terrible fit? And yes I know you could trade Teague in December but I don't that makes sense and just seems the first two months of season would be a waste of time..
They're going to have to pay him soon. Would they rather pay him or Kyrie? I'm thinking they'd rather have Kyrie.
Doesn't make basketball sense to me though even if the trade is simple and they're not giving up too much. He'd be the third banana on that team. Still, Minny makes more sense than any other on his list.
Cleveland doesn't have much to lose waiting until December, otherwise, no you're not starting Teague and Kyrie. Lol Come on. Teague would be Kyrie's backup, obviously.
If only the Spurs had ANYTHING other than maybe Green or Murray that Cleveland wanted, this deal would've been done already, imo.
You're gonna pay 20M per for a back up? He's actually making more $$ for Kyrie..
Why sacrifice a wing player in Wiggins who you're on the brink of signing an extension with for Irving?? So you can bench Teague? Who you just paid 20M over 3yrs?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions