Reply With Quote
I dunno. Ask FKLA. He's the football fan.Real talk, how much (harder) is it for a fatball player to walk 10 steps? I don't doubt for a second that a it's "harder" for a lardball player to ride his scooter down the aisle for another cheesepuff run
I dunno. Ask FKLA. He's the football fan.Real talk, how much (harder) is it for a fatball player to walk 10 steps? I don't doubt for a second that a it's "harder" for a lardball player to ride his scooter down the aisle for another cheesepuff run
I dunno. Ask FKLA. He's the football fan.Real talk, how much (harder) is it for a fatball player to walk 10 steps? I don't doubt for a second that a it's "harder" for a lardball player to ride his scooter down the aisle for another cheesepuff run
Even skaters are laughing at this trans's girly body.
Wow Such racist remarks are so uncalled for.
ducks please ban this guy.
double post
Last edited by midnightpulp; 08-03-2017 at 05:16 AM.
To be fair, Neymar doesn't take steroids like beisbol players
Graph incoming!
He probably takes handjobs from players in the lockerroom.
Double post that had a mention for me?
To be fair, he probably does. Not everyone can look like the Incredible Hulk on roids. The starting point matters.
Protein shakes with friends, they are calling it.He probably takes handjobs from players in the lockerroom.
i've read somewhere Ramona used to play in The fiestas of San Fermin located in Irunea Pamplona.. Aka (running of the bulls)...
I wonder how many dudes she put in the hospital.
Did I read some fat Americans trying to explain baseball is more demanding than rugby !?
omfg
Did I read some fat Americans trying to explain baseball is more demanding than rugby !?
omfg
Did I read some fat Americans trying to explain baseball is more demanding than rugby !?
omfg
No. American football.Did I read some fat Americans trying to explain baseball is more demanding than rugby !?
omfg
But baseball's skill demands are certainly more demanding than rugby. Only a re would argue otherwise.
Forum was real glitchy last night. I lost a post.Double post that had a mention for me?
American football more demanding ??
bro... I'm sure you are too girly for that anyway but do just a rugby training then come back to me...
I do like the back and forth on something soccer one of best feud of st but now we are reaching ridiculous level with this one tbh
Did you see the graph, bro? Proven by science.American football more demanding ??
bro... I'm sure you are too girly for that anyway but do just a rugby training then come back to me...
I do like the back and forth on something soccer one of best feud of st but now we are reaching ridiculous level with this one tbh
Yes, rugby is more demanding per endurance, but the game is primarily built around lateraling. You can't even block in rugby. So on the athletic side, rugby challenges endurance, sprint speed, strength, lateral quickness, and occasionally vertical leap (DAF will come in here and spin this, probably, as if Rugby players are constantly jumping for aerials). Aside from endurance, American football challenges the other traits far more. Fastest ball sport athletes are in football, second highest leapers (after the NBA), and the strongest ball sport athletes are in football.
On the skill side, rugby's lateraling is really nothing particularly difficult to learn. They don't have to learn how to block for ball carriers. Catching is much more difficult in football, since receivers are trying to catch a ball sailing 30 feet high while running a dead sprint. Rugby only challenges kicking on the skill side more.
This is rugby in a nuts :
You won't see anything as skillful as this in rugby:
How tired you are during or after playing a sport doesn't equal demanding, bro. I don't know why you guys use that argument so much?
Forget baseball, forget football. Golf.
Much more tired playing 4 hours of basketball in a hot and humid Southern California summer than strolling around a golf course. Doesn't matter. Golf is still more difficult and demanding.
More technical, maybe. Demanding makes it sound like there's a degree of difficulty that's ever present. In any event, I never argue against the sports that require constant running. People think soccer is so easy 'til they play it and realize that they have to be in peak fitness to meet the rigors of the game.
There is when you're batting, which is the core element of baseball. And also when you're pitching. Not to mention catching. Catchers make their job look ridiculously easy, but check out what happens when a Joe tries to catch a 100mph in a cage.
And infielders are often tasked with catching 110-120 mph rockets. What also makes baseball particularly demanding (and mentally frustrating) is how the sport is structured around limited opportunity. You get 4 offensive chances on average and that's it. And in the field, you might only get one shot at making a run saving catch with the bases loaded, and if you it up (even early in the game), you might not get a chance to redeem yourself.
Tom Brady can throw 2 interceptions in the first quarter, but still able to rebound since he'll get 40-50 pass attempts. Lebron can go 2-12 in the first half, but still redeem himself in the second half. Limited opportunities in those sports only happen during the end game (i.e. miss a GW shot or drop a GW TD).
"Constant running" doesn't equal demanding. I'll use the golf argument, again.
I'll be much more tired, beat up, banged up after 3 or 4 hours of playing basketball in 100 degree weather than riding around a golf course. Golf will still demand more of me to post a good round, though.
As someone who used to play catcher, I'd say it is ridiculously easy, relatively speaking. Of course the average shmuck might have a hard time catching a fastball, though. , I might would to now that I haven't done it for so long.
Well of course it's going to be easy for someone trained and familiar with the position, just like dribbling has become ridiculously easy for basketball players. Put a basketball in someone's hand who's never played, and he looks like a fool.
Also, what level baseball did you play at? If high school, you probably weren't seeing 100mph fastballs and 90mph sliders (or did you play with some MLB prospects?). Not talking , but MLB level speeds and movement are a whole 'nother level.
I agree; significant diff between HS and pros; though, most HS catchers would not have a big problem with catching pro pitchers, tbh.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
