TSA scouring 4chan to generate a list of Democrats Mueller is going to indict.
Uday.
I don't see how you deluded yourself into thinking the Russians were working for Fusion GPS and not the other way around. Given the email chain and the Russian contacts used as go-betweens, Fusion GPS wasn't needed for this operation at all.
You need to show how they were needed in any capacity in this operation, much less the masterminds controlling all the Russians involved.
EDITED TO ADD: and why would the DNC-Fusion Chalupa Great Satan just sit on all that information? They had the brain trust, such as it was, of the Trump campaign opening colluding with the Russians and did absolutely nothing with it. You need to credibly explain how you think they flat out murdered one of their own but didn't even try to expose this meeting you say they set up.
Last edited by Pavlov; 08-03-2017 at 02:44 PM.
TSA scouring 4chan to generate a list of Democrats Mueller is going to indict.
ting pants time.
Apparently only for the election shenaniganS
I expect at least one more GJ for the financial/tax crimes
Btw, Pres can only pardon Federal criminals, not state criminals, and pardons can come only after actual convictions
How did Nixon get pardoned then?
You mean the one looking into Flynn?
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics...turkey/529011/
NO another one today
FLYNN + TURKEY GJ
TRASH + RUSSIA GJ, WHICH COULD INCLUDE FLYNN
Any snarky Trump apologist asking "Where are the indictments, it's been X days/weeks/months?" can ruminate on these statistics from Kenny Starr:
http://bangordailynews.com/2016/07/1...r-prosecutors/The independent counsel investigation lasted eight years, generated more than 3,000 grand jury subpoenas, collected more than 10 million pages of do ents and cost more than $70 million (unadjusted for inflation)
for an indictment over a blowjob.
I'm all for the equal application of justice for President Trump.
BUT WAIT...THERE'S MORE!
![]()
I never said the Russians were working for Fusion GPS, not sure where you got that from.
There was nothing illegal about the meeting and it was of no value to them until after Hillary lost. At the time they had that information the DNC was actively colluding with the Ukranian government and did not need that getting out to the public. What we are seeing now are attempts to distract from the real collusion.
^^^
all theory of course so don't whine again about me stating these as fact
booboo is "special"
the subpoenas related to the trump jr meeting are obviously a way to nail susan rice to the wall, tbh
excellent news
VERY special, and dont u forget it, unspecial
Lock Him Up: Robert Mueller Is Exploring Prosecuting Trump’s Financial Crimes With Russia
Special Counsel Robert Mueller is following the money, and where it is leading him is to a potential prosecution of Trump for financial crimes with Russia
http://www.politicususa.com/2017/08/...robert-mueller
You have Fusion GPS directing all the Russians involved.
Sure thing, Pollyanna. That's why the Trumps are still lying about it to this day. Dropping that information before the election would have sunk the campaign and you know it.There was nothing illegal about the meeting and it was of no value to them until after Hillary lost.
At the time they had that information the DNC was actively colluding with the Ukranian government and did not need that getting out to the public.REMEMBER REMEMBER CHALUPA UKRAINE. So Chalupa's briefs would sink the Clinton campaign but Team Trump's meeting with Russian agents wouldn't do anything to his chances.
That's completely disingenuous, TSA.
As a theory, it sucks.What we are seeing now are attempts to distract from the real collusion.
^^^
all theory of course so don't whine again about me stating these as fact
We're not talking about proving cases in courts of law, were talking about telling stories to people watching tv and reading facebook in swing counties. Trump's approval ratings are in the ter in no small part due to the Russia issue, and to pretend dropping the Uday meeting before the election would do nothing is ridiculous.
Agreed. Obama and Susan are finished.
The other thing that I think is throwing him into a tizzy is that there was more than "Guccifer" rooting around in the system. Long before that event, the FBI was attempting to tell the DNC that there was some intrusion into their network. This was well before the Crowdstrike report.
He seems to be under the impression that this was the only thing that happened to the DNC.
There was much more than one copy pasta attempt:
http://www.esquire.com/news-politics...otect-america/
A CrowdStrike security expert had sent the DNC a proprietary software package, called Falcon, that monitors the networks of its clients in real time. Falcon "lit up," the email said, within ten seconds of being installed at the DNC: Russia was in the network.The analyst said there was no doubt. Falcon had detected malicious software, or malware, that was stealing data and sending it to the same servers that had been used in a 2015 attack on the German Bundestag. The code and techniques used against the DNC resembled those from earlier attacks on the White House and the State Department. The analyst, a former intelligence officer, told Alperovitch that Falcon had identified not one but two Russian intruders: Cozy Bear, a group CrowdStrike's experts believed was affiliated with the FSB, Russia's answer to the CIA; and Fancy Bear, which they had linked to the GRU, Russian military intelligenceThe day after the media maelstrom, the reporters were back with less friendly questions: Had Alperovitch gotten his facts right? Was he certain Russia was behind the DNC hacks? The doubts were prompted by the appearance of a blogger claiming to be from Eastern Europe who called himself Guccifer 2.0. Guccifer said that the breach was his, not Russia's. "DNC'S servers hacked by a lone hacker," he wrote in a blog post that included stolen files from the DNC. "I guess CrowdStrike customers should think twice about company's competence," Guccifer wrote. " CrowdStrike!!!!!!!!!"
TSA didn't comment on that traitor McMaster, did he?
He would also have to work hard to explain why an en y working for Democrats would release personal email addresses and phone numbers of Democratic party leaders, i.e. Democratic members of Congress.Two weeks later, files from the DCCC began to appear on Guccifer 2.0's website. This time he released information about Democratic congressional candidates who were running close races in Florida, Ohio, Illinois, and Pennsylvania. On August 12, he went further, publishing a spreadsheet that included the personal email addresses and phone numbers of nearly two hundred Democratic members of Congress.
That evidence does not appear consistent with his theory.
you're the most tremendously special person on this forum
I stated time and time again guccifer 2.0 wasn't the only one in the DNC system. You were late to the "hacking" thread so I understand your ignorance, but don't try and put words in my mouth.
R E S P E K
There are currently 5 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 5 guests)