Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 34
  1. #1
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    22,886
    A tax break popular with homeowners and the real estate industry could take a hit as Republicans look for ways to pay for their tax reform plan.

    Despite promises from the Trump administration in April that it would “protect the homeownership … deductions,” multiple sources tracking tax reform said that the cap on the mortgage interest deduction — currently set at the interest on up to $1 million of mortgage debt — could be lowered in tax reform.

    http://www.politico.com/story/2017/0...benefit-241328

    Glad my house is paid for.

  2. #2
    bandwagoner fans suck ducks's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Post Count
    74,377
    One million in interest is alot

  3. #3
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Post Count
    43,448
    Is like he wants to bleed out his own base of support.

    He'll be at Bush's approval levels in a a few months.

  4. #4
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    20,699
    Is like he wants to bleed out his own base of support.

    He'll be at Bush's approval levels in a a few months.
    Did you even read the article?

  5. #5
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    20,699
    One million in interest is alot

  6. #6
    Millennial Messiah UNT Eagles 2016's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    16,847
    Is like he wants to bleed out his own base of support.

    He'll be at Bush's approval levels in a a few months.
    wait, Bush's was ever this bad?

    Bush is actually a pretty good Democrat by today's standards. His policies are pretty similar to HRC's, honestly. And it's not just foreign policy. "No Child Left Behind" is a total Hillary policy, tbh.

  7. #7
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    22,886
    wait, Bush's was ever this bad?

    Bush is actually a pretty good Democrat by today's standards. His policies are pretty similar to HRC's, honestly. And it's not just foreign policy. "No Child Left Behind" is a total Hillary policy, tbh.
    Yeah let's pretend Clinton wasn't in step with teacher's unions and against national standards or that the bird Alexander who wrote/sponsored the bill isn't still in the House.

    GOPO S are a special brand of delusional.

    The difference between what Reagan and the Bushes did as opposed to the modern GOP of McConnell, Ryan, and Bozo the President is that when the former would do supply side tax cuts they would cut everyone in whereas today's version doesn't cut you in unless you make a quarter million a year.

  8. #8
    notthewordsofonewhokneels Thread's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Post Count
    91,195
    I'll just bet he's weighing.

  9. #9
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    6,202
    I thought most of you liberals were for sticking it to the rich - this cap down to $500 would do that. Doubling the standard deduction would help the little man too - especially if they don't own a home.

  10. #10
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    6,202
    500k

  11. #11
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    6,202
    Whatever caps are used should be increased by say average % increase of home prices from previous year so inflation doesn't eat away at it.

  12. #12
    my unders, my frgn whites pgardn's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Post Count
    39,469
    One million in interest is alot
    * cue double take*

    How does a duck know, which direction South is?
    Or how to tell his wife, from all the other ducks?
    Hmmm?

    You can cut a chicken's head off
    And it will keep on movin
    And twitchin...

  13. #13
    my unders, my frgn whites pgardn's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Post Count
    39,469
    Whatever caps are used should be increased by say average % increase of home prices from previous year so inflation doesn't eat away at it.
    Oh here we go again.
    Complicating the tax code.
    Flat tax, no credits, no deductions.
    Simples...

    Who ever knew the economy could be so complex...

  14. #14
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    6,202
    Oh here we go again.
    Complicating the tax code.
    Flat tax, no credits, no deductions.
    Simples...

    Who ever knew the economy could be so complex...
    Not a hill I'm willing to die on - I won't care in a few years - not that I'd ever be borrowing that amount of money. And a flat tax would suit me just fine - but that wouldn't be fair to low-income people, right?

  15. #15
    Millennial Messiah UNT Eagles 2016's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    16,847
    500k is still a LOT of interest to deduct, you're talking about owning at least 3-4 large apartment complexes or over 20 sfhomes.

  16. #16
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    flat tax would suit me just fine - but that wouldn't be fair to low-income people, right?
    no, flat tax so beloved by the 1%, or 5%, is inhumanely regressive, which is why they love it.

    We got ours, we want much more, and we and our greedy geens are gonna the poor to sickness and death.

  17. #17
    Mr. John Wayne CosmicCowboy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    44,141
    500k is still a LOT of interest to deduct, you're talking about owning at least 3-4 large apartment complexes or over 20 sfhomes.
    Its not 500k of interest. Its interest on a 500k mortgage.you can buy a pretty decent home in san antonio for 500k, but that wont buy in LA or san francisco or new york.

  18. #18
    my unders, my frgn whites pgardn's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Post Count
    39,469
    Not a hill I'm willing to die on - I won't care in a few years - not that I'd ever be borrowing that amount of money. And a flat tax would suit me just fine - but that wouldn't be fair to low-income people, right?
    But you care now?

    Why do you care now?

  19. #19
    Mr. John Wayne CosmicCowboy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    44,141
    Im assuming it wouldnt apply to rental homes as mortgage interest is just another business expense.

    It would definitely slow illegal immigration because it would kill new home construction and most are built by illegals.

  20. #20
    Millennial Messiah UNT Eagles 2016's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    16,847
    Its not 500k of interest. Its interest on a 500k mortgage.you can buy a pretty decent home in san antonio for 500k, but that wont buy in LA or san francisco or new york.
    well you'll still be able to deduct some, up to the certain cap amount

  21. #21
    Millennial Messiah UNT Eagles 2016's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    16,847
    Im assuming it wouldnt apply to rental homes as mortgage interest is just another business expense.

    It would definitely slow illegal immigration because it would kill new home construction and most are built by illegals.
    That's what I'm hoping. As long as the mortgage interest is always still considered a business expense.

    Really if you're going to buy a home to live in for that much, just buy it with cash.

  22. #22
    Mr. John Wayne CosmicCowboy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    44,141
    Personally i have no problem borrowing money to buy houses, at least in tbe sa market. When you can pay 3.25% on an asset that increases in value 5% a year the math works just fine for me.

  23. #23
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    6,202
    But you care now?

    Why do you care now?
    I deduct mortgage interest now. My house will be paid off then. It doesn't matter much to me as I'm at the end of my loan (not much interest now). But increasing the standard deduction in favor of the mortgage deduction evens it out for those who don't own a home (rent).

  24. #24
    my unders, my frgn whites pgardn's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Post Count
    39,469
    I deduct mortgage interest now. My house will be paid off then. It doesn't matter much to me as I'm at the end of my loan (not much interest now). But increasing the standard deduction in favor of the mortgage deduction evens it out for those who don't own a home (rent).
    Ahhh based on YOUR situation.

  25. #25
    my unders, my frgn whites pgardn's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Post Count
    39,469
    Personally i have no problem borrowing money to buy houses, at least in tbe sa market. When you can pay 3.25% on an asset that increases in value 5% a year the math works just fine for me.
    Buying a house does not work like a government bond.
    No one guarantees you 5% every year.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •