Reply With Quote
Has Susan rice been indicted yet for the super serious unmasking scandal?
Coming from you, the lord of re ed conspiracies who also likes to frequent 4chan and infowars and the likes, your comments means jack .
You're literally known for being the stain conspiracy guy of ST.
Has Susan rice been indicted yet for the super serious unmasking scandal?
Hillary's crimes were out in public arena for anyone to see.Sorry, you were spouting off all manner of laws in the case you predicted would be brought against Hillary Clinton.
Now you can't cite even one.
Your theory is that Mueller will indict [some Democrats] over [some law] at [some time].
Edited to add:
You can't claim it will "absolutely not be a witch hunt" and then follow immediately with "Russians are most likely involved".
If no Russians are involved, will you admit the special counsel was nothing but a witch hunt?
So, you're sure some Democrats broke some law somewhere at some time -- you just don't know who, which law where or when.
Is that accurate?
I'll take ST conspiracy guy over ST dunce any day. You've earned your dunce cap, wear it proudly.Coming from you, the lord of re ed conspiracies who also likes to frequent 4chan and infowars and the likes, your comments means jack .
You're literally known for being the stain conspiracy guy of ST.
Pretty accurate and sounds exactly like what is going on with Trump's team.
No. But tell me again about the security clearances you think she still has
Russians would be intimately involved IMO. To have money laundering, you have to have people who need money laundered. I have trouble seeing a money laundering case that would not involve Russians.
You can't dictate what I think, TSA. I suppose you are trying to make up rules for another one of your silly games, but too bad.
No. But tell me again about the security clearances you think she still haspowers not rice
Russians are the only people that need money laundered
Oh we already have several members of team Trump lying to the FBI and on security clearance forms. Much farther along than your fantasy Democrat indictments.
The last thing I saw (McMaster letter) indicated she does have clearance. What is your evidence she doesn't? I'd be glad to take a look at it.No. But tell me again about the security clearances you think she still has
I never said that. You always seem to revert to fallacies and personal insults when flustered. It's tiresome.
Oh noes, a troll called me an asshole.
That's Major Asshole to you.
True.
The Iranian Republican Guards also do. *cough* Trump hotel in Azerbaijan *cough*
By whose account? Spurraider? That's 1 among hundreds who think you're a dumb mother er who falls for dumb conpiracies daily.
BTW, that's including Spurraider who thinks you're a dumb . Ducks doesn't even hold a candle to your ery.
Trumps conflict of interest thread is that way....---------->
How much taxpayer money do you think that Trump should shovel into his pockets? Is there a limit or acceptable amount?
I'd really like you to try and explain this exchange here and show how it makes any sense. If you can do so I will admit you are smarter than ducks and I will let you choose my avatar picture.Coming from you, the lord of re ed conspiracies who also likes to frequent 4chan and infowars and the likes, your comments means jack .
You're literally known for being the stain conspiracy guy of ST.
Here is your chance Reck, get all your ducks in a row and show the board you aren't the dunce it believes you to be. I am rooting for you to prove me wrong as this avatar is getting confusing when I'm conversing with RandomGuy.
Here from one of your GO TOs:No. But tell me again about the security clearances you think she still has
Almost one month after it was disclosed that former President Obama's National Security Adviser Susan Rice was unmasking members of President Trump’s team and other Americans, Trump’s own national security adviser, H.R. McMaster, sent an official letter giving her unfettered and continuing access to classified information and waiving her “need-to-know” requirement on anything she viewed or received during her tenure, Circa has confirmed.
https://www.circa.com/story/2017/08/...er-letter-says
Your choice. I had it first, and ain't changing.
Do you have a source that shows the clearance McMaster gave Rice has been rescinded?No. But tell me again about the security clearances you think she still has
I'd love to see it.
Podesta amended the same forms Kushner did. And don't forget Podesta worked with the same Ukrainians Manafort is in hot water for.
She still has a limited clearance, but it isn't what you were all circle jerking about the other day.
BTW TSA how's the dem party doing? Is it in fall down mode as you predicted yet?
It's not a game. I gave you an opportunity to prove you aren't stupid and you declined. You are either too stupid to defend yourself or too embarrassed to explain yourself after seeing your quotes.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Posting Permissions