Reply With Quote
Looks like I won't be changing either after Reck tucked tail.Your choice. I had it first, and ain't changing.
So you're saying Podesta is going to be indicted by Rosenstein (I think that would be technically correct if it goes the way of other Special Counsels)? If Podesta left off several hundred foreign contacts I would demand his clearance be downgraded or outright revoked. Do you feel the same about Kushner?
Do you have a source stating that? The McMaster letter is pretty specific and it has the advantage of actually existing.She still has a limited clearance, but it isn't what you were all circle jerking about the other day.
Looks like I won't be changing either after Reck tucked tail.Your choice. I had it first, and ain't changing.
I already said to pull Kushner's clearance.
It's in the McMaster letter.
None of the above.
It's just to with you because your posting has a shelf life of about 1 week. All your re ed claims self debunk in that time period so it's nice to shove them in your face and see you skate your way through your own bull .
It's OK, you'll do it for meNo. But tell me again about the security clearances you think she still has
What clearance was I participating in a circle jerk about? The main thing I was touting was they found no wrongdoing on her part, which I told you was pretty obvious a couple months ago. You were the one insisting she'd be indicted for the massiveunmasking scandal
no one in the msm is covering
spurraider has only questioned two people's intelligence today...and I was not one of them. Who does that leave?
If you really want to have fun with him, find all the times he asked for evidence of meetings between Trump campaign and Russians, and then add in the email topics from Trump Jr.
:LOL
I filled up a page or two, and only got about 1/2 through the thread...
Not ground I would have picked to die on, but the "Muellers really going after the Clintons" is not much better.
So you are just purposely acting dumb when you post?
Great. One down. I'm glad you want to treat him as a potential security risk too.
So the access is exactly what we said it was.It's in the McMaster letter.
OK.
Do you really believe the amount of USP's unmasked and disseminated throughout the WH was standard practice?It's OK, you'll do it for me
What clearance was I participating in a circle jerk about? The main thing I was touting was they found no wrongdoing on her part, which I told you was pretty obvious a couple months ago. You were the one insisting she'd be indicted for the massive
What did you say her access was?
President accuses chief prosecutor of bias
http://www.dw.com/en/brazil-presiden...ias/a-40017482
whoops wrong banana republic...
I posted the circa article first.
Would an investigation into widespread foreign government involvement in our election using USP's involve unmaking USPs?
I dont want to speak for the man himself but when he says if Susan Rice is going to get super indicted because of the super unsmakings and such or when he quotes you about saying one thing and teh oposite mere minutes later---I dont think that's meant as a compliment.
It speaks to your stupidity.
BTW I won't argue about stuff I dont know jack about. If I say something that's wrong---specially in the area of his expertise than I have no problem admitting.
It's better being ignorant about specific subjects than being ignorant and stupid about....reality.
People who believe in fake moon landings, far right pedo conspiracies and the you come up with are in a seperate category. If I'm unitenlligent then what does that make someone who believes in the garbage you do?
Ponder on that TSA.
The man himself has spokenI dont want to speak for the man himself but when he says if Susan Rice is going to get super indicted because of the super unsmakings and such or when he quotes you about saying one thing and teh oposite mere minutes later---I dont think that's meant as a compliment.
It speaks to your stupidity.
BTW I won't argue about stuff I dont know jack about. If I say something that's wrong---specially in the area of his expertise than I have no problem admitting.
It's better being ignorant about specific subjects than being ignorant and stupid about....reality.
People who believe in fake moon landings, far right pedo conspiracies and the you come up with are in a seperate category. If I'm unitenlligent then what does that make someone who believes in the garbage you do?
Ponder on that TSA.
Ponder on that Reck
What did you say her access was?
It's not the unmasking that was the problem, it was minimization procedures not being followed and then the dissemination of said intelligence throughout the WH to leak to the media.
I quoted the same passage Reck did. I characterized it as "free" in a sentence before the quote. As her access is as free as any former NSA in good standing defined in the quote I included, I stand by my characterization and continue to
Based on 1 exchange which makes me believe that was off the cuffs and not meant as actual.The man himself has spoken
Ponder on that Reck
That or spurraider21 has really low standards in comparing intelligence. The average poster here is smarter than you going just base on their postings.
Since when do conspiracy theorist get recconigtion for being the bar of intelligence?
If spurraider thinks like you then I just may have to change the view of the man.
Trump gets a folder full of positive news about himself twice a day
https://news.vice.com/story/trump-fo...ws-white-house
These sensitive papers, described to VICE News by three current and former White House officials, don’t contain top-secret intelligence or updates on legislative initiatives. Instead, the folders are filled with screenshots of positive cable news chyrons (those lower-third headlines and crawls), admiring tweets, transcripts of fawning TV interviews, praise-filled news stories, and sometimes just pictures of Trump on TV looking powerful.
Widdle Twump needs happy news, so he is tippy-top happy. Not like tired old Trump.
Oh noes. The free press finds out about who is talking to foreign governments. The horrors...
What will it be like when he actually has to read war plans and strategic plans and such?
The baby president needs to be removed ASAP.
Start here at post 5690 and my several other posts on that page. That's basically all I have to say on the matter
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/show...=1#post9035720
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)
Posting Permissions