im not a fan of it happening frequently because its much more meaningful if its done the legal way, but ill take one for heather heyer
Ol' Mayor Walsh gonna sort em' out wicked pissah!
They should melt the statue down and turn it into a urinal - at least then it'd finally be useful to society, tbh.
Yay mob justice...see this has brought you a darrin together #unity
tbh its a good way to find out who cares more about meaningless statues than about human lives.
And how do you know that? Do you have links? Of course you don't.
tbh this is the second time you've been caught talking out of your buttcheeks so let me give you a few pointers....
I would say to actually research your points a little bit more before you post but I think that it's ok to talk out of your ass. I do it all the time, but atleast log off or something when it's obvious you're wrong. Don't just keep doubling down like a mongoloid like you've been doing lately. I used to post out of my ass all the time in the NFL Forum (still kinda do) but then I kept getting exposed by spurraider21. Whenever that would happen, I would just log off, pretend I was busy, and wait for the thread to die out.
my nig, you have to be Machiavellian in this joint. It's not about knowing what you're talking about but making others think you do
my dude
You've mentioned this a few times and tbh I don't remember any of our nfl forum discussions. Probably because you weren't a detestable asshole. I remember arguments with those kinds pretty well.
That'll show em
That's some serious virtue signaling going on there. Lol, those chicks going full Office Space on it.
tbh it was awhile ago when you were new I think. And I can't even remember if it was NBA or NFL forum but I would always pretend to know what I was talking about despite the fact that I barely even watch sports anymore
You've mentioned this a few times and tbh I don't remember any of our nfl forum discussions. Probably because you weren't a detestable asshole. I remember arguments with those kinds pretty well.
I would always say something based off of what I saw off a YouTube highlight like "[blank team] has great defense, I think they'll shut Lebron, Peyton, etc down and win the game".
You'd usually respond with something along the lines of "Actually they had the 25th ranked defense so I don't know what you're talking about". I would look it up and realize "Oh , he's right" and then bail faster than Chumpdumper when exposed to sunlight roflrofl
http://www.ronpaullibertyreport.com/...all-socialistsThere's a lot of "left-wing" vs. "right-wing" allegations being thrown around, especially after the latest violence in Charlottesville. We're told that "leftist" Communist groups are pitted against "far-right" Nazi groups.
That may well be the case, but it's important to realize that they're all Socialists!
The whole left/right stuff can be dropped. They're just different brands of Socialism.
It must be remembered that the U.S.S.R. stood for Union of Soviet *Socialist* Republics.
Meanwhile, NAZI stood for National *Socialism.*
So when you look at the ridiculous "political spectrum" that people often use, both "left-wing" and "right-wing" equal Socialism.
Here's a good question: Where does that leave Liberty?
Ahhh....look how that happened!
Liberty is not an option.
But "no...no...no..." you might say: "Communists and Nazis are not the same. Don't you remember World War II? They killed each other by the millions."
True, but that doesn't point out anything other than the fact that socialists don't like each other any more than they like liberty.
Socialism is not one big happy family.
Socialists hate each other and fight viciously for power. Remember Stalin and Trotsky?
Even if you have no idea about their story, just look at the more recent feud between Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders.
Both despise liberty. Both want government to run our lives. But they don't like each other, do they?
Socialists hate other socialists that disagree with them, whether it be in the former U.S.S.R. or even between politicians in what's supposed to be the land of the free.
Socialists are vicious to one other because the real prize is at the top.
When you're the one at the top of the socialist heap, everyone must obey you.
You're the one with the master plan for humanity. You're the one with the correct blueprint for how the rest of human life should live.
Everyone that happens to agree with your master plan is fine. But since people have free will to think as they want, there's always going to other socialists who believe it is they who have the real master plan. You don't have the correct blueprint...they do!
Everyone should obey them!
Now, in reality, neither has the correct blueprint. There's no such thing. No one has the ability to run the world and all of its peoples. There is no form of Socialism that can bring about the utopia that its adherents have conjured up in their imaginations.
But that doesn't stop them from viciously fighting each other for power. And it surely doesn't stop them from perpetually trying to take away every single one of our liberties.
In the end, only Liberty is compatible with human nature.
We are born free and meant to remain free, no matter how many flavors of tyranny try to snatch it away.
Ironically, as kids and adults try to find out where they fit on the bogus "political spectrum," it is liberty that has been taken away as one of the options.
Maybe the next step is to go dig up some confederate burial plots and stomp on them corpses.
oops
this chick tweeted about wild cobra
Why I'm not a fan. Might be a rash of these now.
After the statues, go after the books.
Which books, Darrin?
Whichever ones make them feel uncomfortable.
brah why do you have to be like that? Maybe he's happy going to sleep with the Bible in one hand and Mein Kampf in the other, tbh, IMO, FWIW...
Like what?
And peeps said race relations were the worst when the nignog was at the helm...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
