Reply With Quote
obscure
I'm completely ignorant about a thing so it must not exist!
I'm not aware of all the gov. obscure reports. I do know that the report that was supposed to give the public answers pretended building 7 didn't happen.
You keep making excuses for the fact that the gov. pretended building 7 didn't exist when they were presenting their findings to the public.
The 9/11 commission report is not an engineering report. Engineers write engineering reports. You never read it anyway, just parroted some from a YouTube.
Still no evidence.
Almost as if you don't have any.
You are giving him too much credit. He hasn't even linked a youtube.
That is a whole new level of lazy.
Several demolition experts say otherwise.
The towers fell in a way that was inconsistent with detonations.
WHAT ABOUT THE ALMOST FREE-FALL COLLAPSE OF THE TWIN TOWERS? The key is the “almost” modifier. If I told you I was making almost $100,000 and you found out I was making only $67,000, you’d say I was exaggerating. So stop exaggerating the collapse speed of the WTC Towers! The 80,000 tons of structural steel slowed down the collapses of the Twin Towers to about ⅔ (two-thirds) of free-fall.3 And the core collapsed at about 40% of free-fall speed, coming down last.4 According to Richard Gage: “To bring a building symmetrically down, what we have to do is remove the core columns.” But on 9/11 the stronger core columns came down last, which violates this supposed most fundamental rule of controlled demolition.
I give you evidence and you say "no evidence"
Several demolition experts have testified that it consistent with demolition. And one ex-CIA guy even said he wired the damn building!
Where is it?I give you evidence and you say "no evidence"
Testified? In court?
Let me see.
Speaking of court; blocking the families of 911 from suing Saudi Arabia.
Me: Dude admitted WTC7 detonated.
You: No evidence.
You're a ing joke at this point.
Bro, that's crap. It fell quite consistent with detonation. Even most falsers aren't saying that it isn't.
Honestly, this thread has gone very bad for you. Many lols at your expense.
I'll let you know when you say something of note.
You need to stop.
N/M
This was always my thought. It's not like a bomb was unprecedented, i.e. 1993.
For what? Shouldn't they be suing Bush according to you?Speaking of court; blocking the families of 911 from suing Saudi Arabia.
Which dude?
If you're trying to say Silverstien --
What controlled demolition leaves the cores intact?
For what? Shouldn't they be suing Bush according to you?
Which dude?
If you're trying to say Silverstien --
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions