Lol pussy ass all worked up about statues.
I wonder if Christa McAuliffe owned slaves
Lol pussy ass all worked up about statues.
Lol you are exactly what you hate about others
As long as you aren't worked up.
Also got snowflake pussy ass mommy lake.
You're the one saying changing the name that elevates a racist past is "pussification" -- you need to explain why.
No, but I'm sure she did something in her life that was offensive to someone. Maybe she didn't like trannies in her bathroom. The only one in history that was allegedly perfect was Jesus and I'm pretty sure you gots would object to naming a high school after him.
Actually he raped them. We should be honest about that and all the other history of the people who founded this country. But the difference between Jefferson and Lee is that one was a slave owner who did some horrible things but also some amazing things and the other is only noteworthy for being a traitor who fought to protect slavery. You surely can see the difference there, right?
Also, you're claiming a literal saint whom San Antonio is named for is on par with Lee? The Alamo is named for a tree. Your argument is....odd....
Theres a lack of self awareness in this post that is amazing.
The alamo is named for a tree? Seriously Manny?![]()
Do you know what Alamo means?
You're right, we need to change the history and erase the famous battle cry:
"REMEMBER THE DE VALERO!"
CC certainly remembers me, if you know what I mean.
Its official name was san antonio de valero.
Yeah COTTONWOOD! Who would (wood) pick cotton??!!! Exactly! Racist!
REMEMBER THE BALATASAR DE ZUNIGA Y GUZMAN, DUQUE DE ARION Y MARQUES DE VALERO!
and goliad. whatever.
Is what it is. Named after tbe marques de valero, marquis of new spain, one slave owning, slave expediter for hundreds of thousands of slaves.
Yeah, you've been trying to move the goalposts to any slaveowner ever all afternoon.
Also got snowflake pussy ass mommy lake.
You're the one saying changing the name that elevates an overtly racist past is "pussification" -- you need to explain why.
Obviously the better comparison would be advocating that we should put a statue of Santa Anna at the Alamo to honor the Mexican Army.
And yet we call it the Alamo. In any event, it's a historical site. Aushwitz is preseved too.
You've resorted to this ridiculous posturing to have an argument. You've resorted to comparing astronauts maybe offending someone at some point to people who devoteed their lives to defending slavery.
It's really not a tough sell to most people that if you're only noteworthy for being a traitor who fought a war in order to keep slavery around that you don't deserve to be memorialized.
he has more in common with the union as he also fought Americans breaking away to form a new country in order to have slavery.
All I know is the US used to be so much less pussificationated when Lee High School was built and blacks couldn't vote.
Jesus committed suicide. Not a great message, tbh
I just think decisions on monuments should be made at state and community level.
That's not happening? I missed the federal legislation on the matter.
explain the thought process that went into this gem.
So, let me tell you about this statue in Charlottesville....
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)