Ray Lewis: Colin Kaepernick's girlfriend cost him a job in Baltimore

[Pavlov]

Pavlov

Is Ray Lewis the snowflake? Is the owner a snowflake? Is the organization as a whole snowflakes? You could have easily clarified this, hours ago. But you prefer to play games; par for the course.

pasty boy

[Spurtacular]

pasty boy

Since you've sufficiently proven that you're too much of a pussy to answer the questions, let's progress with the convo. Why is the owner a snowflake to not sign an idiot dumb enough to have him (and the face of the franchise) attacked in a tweet?

[Pavlov]

Since you've sufficiently proven that you're too much of a pussy to answer the questions, let's progress with the convo. Why is the owner a snowflake to not sign an idiot dumb enough to have him (and the face of the franchise) attacked in a tweet?

Baltimore snowflakes.

[Spurtacular]

Baltimore snowflakes.

So, if a guy had talked you, you would have signed him?

[Pavlov]

So, if a guy had talked you, you would have signed him?

It wasn't him, you idiot. What the is your problem? You don't even know the one critical fact in this whole situaton.

Just like a truther. Ignorant.

[Pavlov]

Holy , dude. It's the le of of the thread. How can you possibly be taken seriously at this point ?

[Spurtacular]

It wasn't him, you idiot. What the is your problem? You don't even know the one critical fact in this whole situaton.

Just like a truther. Ignorant.

I figured we could skip over the inconsequential details; but not with you, of course. His girlfriend represents him, dude. If she's talking, then so is he.

[Spurtacular]

Holy , dude. It's the le of of the thread. How can you possibly be taken seriously at this point ?

Come on, dude. talk from the Kaepernick camp at the end of the day. You're doing semantics.....

But since we must do your gimp , then I rephrase the question:

If a dude's girlfriend or wife is publicly talking against you, you'd sign him?

[Pavlov]

Nope. You're done. You proved you're an ignorant piece of like every truther. You're either ignorant or you just outright lied. Neither is acceptable.

[Spurtacular]

Nope. You're done. You proved you're an ignorant piece of like every truther. You're either ignorant or you just outright lied. Neither is acceptable.

Triggered

You taking your ball and storming home?

[Pavlov]

Triggered

You taking your ball and storming home?

You done ed up. Sorry.

[Spurtacular]

You done ed up. Sorry.

I can see why you dodged the question for literally days. It did not take you very long to melt like the snowflake you ironically are once we got to the red meat.

Could it be that you don't have a good answer for, 'would you hire someone whose people are talking you?' Could it be that you were ing totally full of for calling them snowflakes, then? Methinks, nay meknows yes!

[Spurtacular]

Chris DMC Pavlov Chucho spurraider21 ChumpDumper DarrinS Fabbs

See the preceding from Pavlov for further context....

[Chucho]

You done ed up. Sorry.

"I got front n back, and side to side..."

Pav's gots 75% of that.

[Chris]

Chris DMC Pavlov Chucho spurraider21 ChumpDumper DarrinS Fabbs

See the preceding from Pavlov for further context....

He's all out of sorts because Mueller is giving him blue balls

[Pavlov]

begging for help after being exposed not reading the OP.

[spurraider21]

He's out of the league because his ability is trumped by his antics. If he was a net positive he'd be in the league. Case in point: Jeff Ayers was one of the tiest players in the history of the Spurs. He still played all season because his net effect on the team didn't detract from their ability to win a championship nor bring bad press or shine a negative light on the organization, ergo Jeff was only judged by his playing ability. He wasn't better than Stephen Jackson yet Jackson was released. Do you think that was because of his play? Let's say Jackson played at Lebron's level, would Pop have released him for refusing to come off the bench? Of course not. Jackson's ability didn't surpass his negatives, same with CK. He might be a serviceable QB in a vacuum, but all things are considered.

So yeah, he's only out of the league because of his play, just like everyone who's out of the league because of their play. Jeremy Lin could have been out of the NBA if he didn't catch fire and get Linsanity started. He's in the league because of the hype and to a much lesser extent, his play.

Tim Tebow is another example. He was a bit of an enigma, a flash in the pan and wasn't even a decent QB. But he was popular, so he played. If CK was popular in a positive way, he'd probably be signed somewhere. If he was Terrell Owens or Pacman Jones level negative, but with Tom Brady ability, he'd definitely be playing.

His level of play in a vacuum warrants a roster spot. He's out because of his political views/actions.

[DarrinS]

His level of play in a vacuum warrants a roster spot. He's out because of his political views/actions.

So, weighing his talent vs his level of distraction, no team wants him. Got it.

[Drachen]

2 things.

1. Is she hot?
2. Didn't Ray Lewis literally murder someone and still get to play for another decade? - I'm pretty sure that the "you can't play because someone other than you posted a mean picture" excuse doesn't hold water.

[spurraider21]

So, weighing his talent vs his level of distraction, no team wants him. Got it.

Precisely. And if snowflake fans are going to cause his kneeling to become a distraction, then so be it. I've been saying that all along.

But saying "meh he's washed up" or "he's just not a good enough player anymore, don't get why people are bringing up the politics" is disingenuous

[Spurminator]

Precisely. And if snowflake fans are going to cause his kneeling to become a distraction, then so be it. I've been saying that all along.

But saying "meh he's washed up" or "he's just not a good enough player anymore, don't get why people are bringing up the politics" is disingenuous

As usual, they can't keep their own arguments straight.

If the claim is that he's been kept out of the league because of politics, the argument is "No, he's out because he's not good."

If the argument is that he's better than other NFL quarterbacks in the league, the argument is that teams have a right to keep him out over politics.

So it's both not about politics and totally about politics.

Pick a lane and stick to it.

[ElNono]

@ begging for an answer for 20 posts, then suddenly calling somebody else triggered...

[DMC]

His level of play in a vacuum warrants a roster spot. He's out because of his political views/actions.

He's out because of his relative negative effect on profits. It has nothing to do with his political views.

[DMC]

Precisely. And if snowflake fans are going to cause his kneeling to become a distraction, then so be it. I've been saying that all along.

But saying "meh he's washed up" or "he's just not a good enough player anymore, don't get why people are bringing up the politics" is disingenuous

He's not good enough.

Do you think he takes a knee if he hears the anthem at home? no, he used the NFL to push his agenda. He paid the price. What good is sacrifice is nothing is lost? He should be happy.

[ElNono]

He's out because of his relative negative effect on profits. It has nothing to do with his political views.

Well, one can argue that 'his relative negative effect on profits' is directly related to his 'political views'...

But nevertheless, I agree it's not all bad for him... Pop will probably call him to talk to his players next year, IMO, tbh...