Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 51 to 75 of 102
  1. #51
    Believe. Pavlov's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Post Count
    41,752
    Q: Why aren't you admitting that Hillary negligently handled classified intel?

    A: Sperm shielding.
    Criminally? There would have to be a trial. Why isn't there a trial?

    Yes you pedantic twit, basically. Get your act together.


    They are all corrupt. You cannot win the office without being corrupt.
    OK. As long as you're admitting Trump is corrupt.

  2. #52
    Got Woke? DMC's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Post Count
    90,829
    Criminally? There would have to be a trial. Why isn't there a trial?



    OK. As long as you're admitting Trump is corrupt.
    Admitting? I said so when he first decided to run, and again when he made it to November and again when he won. He's just not good at covering his ass.

  3. #53
    6X ST MVP
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    81,091
    Criminally? There would have to be a trial. Why isn't there a trial?
    You're smart enough to know that not all crimes get prosecuted; you're sperm shielding further.

  4. #54
    Believe. Pavlov's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Post Count
    41,752
    You're smart enough to know that not all crimes get prosecuted; you're sperm shielding further.
    You asked. I answered.

    What crime do you say she committed and how long do you think she should serve in prison?

  5. #55
    6X ST MVP
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    81,091
    You asked. I answered.

    What crime do you say she committed and how long do you think she should serve in prison?
    You did answer....albeit incompetently.

    What crime do you say she committed regardless of whether you think she should be in prison?

  6. #56
    Believe. Pavlov's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Post Count
    41,752
    You did answer....albeit incompetently.

    What crime do you say she committed regardless of whether you think she should be in prison?
    what a stupid question. I said I don't know if her negligence is criminal. That's what a trial would determine if prosecutors think it is criminal.

    What crime do you say she committed and how long do you think she should be in prison?

  7. #57
    6X ST MVP
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    81,091
    what a stupid question. I said I don't know if her negligence is criminal. That's what a trial would determine if prosecutors think it is criminal.

    What crime do you say she committed and how long do you think she should be in prison?


    (f) Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any do ent, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—Shall be fined under this le or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

    BIGGEST CUCK ON ST!

  8. #58
    Believe. Pavlov's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Post Count
    41,752


    (f) Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any do ent, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—Shall be fined under this le or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

    BIGGEST CUCK ON ST!
    What is the legal definition for gross negligence?

  9. #59
    6X ST MVP
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    81,091
    What is the legal definition for gross negligence?
    I'd say sending out classified info on an unauthorized server for all of America's enemies to easily attain qualifies, bro.

  10. #60
    Believe. Pavlov's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Post Count
    41,752
    I'd say sending out classified info on an unauthorized server for all of America's enemies to easily attain qualifies, bro.
    You didn't answer the question.

    What is the legal definition of gross negligence?

  11. #61
    6X ST MVP
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    81,091
    You didn't answer the question.

    What is the legal definition of gross negligence?
    I'm not going to get lost in the weeds just because you want to sperm shield for Hillary. Go buy your I'm with her pins on heavy discount since you want to sperm shield for her.

  12. #62
    Believe. Pavlov's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Post Count
    41,752

  13. #63
    non-essential Chris's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Post Count
    39,908

  14. #64
    6X ST MVP
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    81,091
    You tell me if Hillary committed gross negligence or not. I've already assessed this to be the case. Put up or shut up, cuck.

  15. #65
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    you rightwingnug assholes STILL obsessed with Hillary, Obama, Soros, but have NO PROBLEM, OBJECTIONS to Trash's criminal enterprise, nor the entire oligarchy/VRWC ing NETWORK of right wing hate media, and total DISinformation, propaganda, alternate facts, denials of irrefutable science.
    Last edited by boutons_deux; 09-11-2017 at 09:58 AM.

  16. #66
    bandwagoner fans suck ducks's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Post Count
    74,377
    there is no proof of trump criminal enterprise?
    and if he got a loan from Russia is it illegal?
    if it was he would have been caught a loan time ago. the irs has audited him every year they know he did not break the law

  17. #67
    Believe. Pavlov's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Post Count
    41,752
    You tell me if Hillary committed gross negligence or not. I've already assessed this to be the case. Put up or shut up, cuck.
    You can't make a case for gross negligence because you can't even legally define gross negligence.

  18. #68
    6X ST MVP
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    81,091
    You can't make a case for gross negligence because you can't even legally define gross negligence.
    You won't assess whether Hillary acted with gross negligence after all these months (years). You're a sperm shield.

  19. #69
    Believe. Pavlov's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Post Count
    41,752
    You won't assess whether Hillary acted with gross negligence after all these months (years). You're a sperm shield.
    From what I know about gross negligence it would have to be proved in a trial, and it would probably be tougher than just declaring someone guilty on a message board without any knowledge of gross negligence whatsoever. What I'm saying is this: You're pretty ignorant, counselor.

  20. #70
    bandwagoner fans suck ducks's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Post Count
    74,377
    You can't make a case for gross negligence because you can't even legally define gross negligence.


    Gross negligence



    Gross negligence is a legal concept which means serious carelessness. Negligence is the opposite of diligence, or being careful. The standard of ordinary negligence is what conduct deviates from the proverbial "reasonable person."

  21. #71
    bandwagoner fans suck ducks's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Post Count
    74,377
    Gross Negligence

    An indifference to, and a blatant violation of, a legal duty with respect to the rights of others.

    Gross negligence is a conscious and voluntary disregard of the need to use reasonable care, which is likely to cause foreseeable grave injury or harm to persons, property, or both. It is conduct that is extreme when compared with ordinary Negligence, which is a mere failure to exercise reasonable care. Ordinary negligence and gross negligence differ in degree of inattention, while both differ from willful and wanton conduct, which is conduct that is reasonably considered to cause injury. This distinction is important, since contributory negligence—a lack of care by the plaintiff that combines with the defendant's conduct to cause the plaintiff's injury and completely bar his or her action—is not a defense to willful and wanton conduct but is a defense to gross negligence. In addition, a finding of willful and wanton misconduct usually supports a recovery of Punitive Damages, whereas gross negligence does not.

    http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Gross+negligence

  22. #72
    6X ST MVP
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    81,091
    From what I know about gross negligence it would have to be proved in a trial, and it would probably be tougher than just declaring someone guilty on a message board without any knowledge of gross negligence whatsoever. What I'm saying is this: You're pretty ignorant, counselor.
    Everything pretty much has to be proved at trial when the rubber meets the road. What I'm saying is that you're a sperm shield.

  23. #73
    6X ST MVP
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    81,091
    Gross Negligence

    An indifference to, and a blatant violation of, a legal duty with respect to the rights of others.

    Gross negligence is a conscious and voluntary disregard of the need to use reasonable care, which is likely to cause foreseeable grave injury or harm to persons, property, or both. It is conduct that is extreme when compared with ordinary Negligence, which is a mere failure to exercise reasonable care. Ordinary negligence and gross negligence differ in degree of inattention, while both differ from willful and wanton conduct, which is conduct that is reasonably considered to cause injury. This distinction is important, since contributory negligence—a lack of care by the plaintiff that combines with the defendant's conduct to cause the plaintiff's injury and completely bar his or her action—is not a defense to willful and wanton conduct but is a defense to gross negligence. In addition, a finding of willful and wanton misconduct usually supports a recovery of Punitive Damages, whereas gross negligence does not.

    http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Gross+negligence
    We'll see if sperm shield bothers to form an opinion against his overlord now.

  24. #74
    Believe. Pavlov's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Post Count
    41,752
    Everything pretty much has to be proved at trial
    So we agree.

    again

  25. #75
    6X ST MVP
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    81,091
    So we agree.

    again
    The subtext is/was that you're saying axiomatic statements to filibuster and ultimately sperm shield.

    Go ahead and tell us whether Miss Clinton acted with gross negligence and broke the law if you want to say anything meaningful.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •