We're not debating the purpose of trials, sperm shield.
look like I triggered your thesaurus.
We agreed it would be determined in a trial. If you want to argue some other position, you're going to have to take that position first.
We're not debating the purpose of trials, sperm shield.
I don't know what you're trying to debate at this point. If you want to set up a mock trial, go to law school, counselor.
man. Do you even understand the basic concept of guilt in the US?
I don't think you do. You're just a conspiracy nut worthy of lols
Chump losing the argument; had to switch screen names to run out of the corner![]()
Answer a simple question, bro. Did Hillary Clinton act with gross negligence in your legal opinion. We don't have to debate the purpose of trials for you to do that.
I don't have a legal opinion, counselor. Everything I've read outside of this board leads me to believe it would be difficult to prove in court. I'm content with that.
You think I'm ChumpDumper?
Explain your theory. Be specific.
You mean Spurtacular still doesn't know who Chump is under his new name?![]()
I'm also you.
No I'm not
Yes we are.
Ah , may as well let the forum in on the joke.
We're Spurtacular too.
Gotcha.
Thank Mormon that's over. That was exhausting.
Boy, you're lost.![]()
mo's entire post- career has been a storm surge of bitterness.
Yeah, I'm the one that's lost, farm boy...![]()
Imaginary investigations must be better than real ones...
you are a ing idiot. Possibly the dumbest to ever walk the planet. Even Blake is smarter than you.
Lets not get carried away.![]()
Blake IS smarter tho.
But yes...Boots is very, very ing re ed. Like, lowest of the low here. And buddy, that's pretty in low.
my dear little bleeding butt, you pissed off? you're losing control, stay on your knees and take my slapping like a little
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)