Whoa! More worthless blanket statements that don't mean !
Let me remind you:
Pavlov: 'Why couldn't the Ravens owner be a good cuck like me and take CK's abuse (via his )?'
/thread
Abuse - language that condemns or vilifies usually unjustly, intemperately, and angrily
Pavlov: 'Why couldn't the Ravens owner be a good cuck like me and take CK's abuse (via his )?'
/thread
Pavlov: 'Why couldn't the Ravens owner be a good cuck like me and take CK's abuse (via his )?'
/thread
:abuse victim
Never called him a victim, bro. Owner took a out, tbh.
If he's not a victim of abuse, what's the problem?
Owner was a recipient of abuse. No problem. He took a out at the knees.
So he was a victim of abuse. OK. And did nothing to his abuser.
Oh, well I'm glad to see you're owning up to the fact that CK's gf is an abuser.
Real G twitter abuse victim!
Do you think this is novel, a person paying a heavy price for immature actions via social media?
Which person?
A person. Learn the language.
But which person in this case?
You know who paid the price in this case, bro.
CK?
He didn't do anything to anyone.
When you stop pretending there's only one variable in the equation of employment as a professional athlete that resolves to the package the individual has to offer.
We weren't immediately discussing who did whatever. Who paid the price, bro?
You know his schtick already. He's going to use "so..." before some narrative he creates and then chase that for pages as if he just created a new reality by offering a strawman.
CK.
He didn't do anything to anyone.
Yes, but his girlfriend did. Or do you think that players should be allowed to have their immediate 'loved ones' be allowed to talk the organization with impunity?
Yea, I know. And it's fun because he thinks he sees five moves ahead; but I often squash him in one or two.![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)