Reply With Quote
culpable
Guilt by association. That's all you got. Nothing else.
Snowflake.
It's not just someone. It's his common law wife. He took no care to disavow the himself of the sentiment. He's culpable, bro.
It's someone else's tweet. Who gives a besides snowflakes?
Guilt by association. That's all you got. Nothing else.
Snowflake.
So, you think he should be allowed to have his cake and eat it to?
Guilt by association. That's all you got. Nothing else.
Snowflake.
His gf should be allowed to talk prospective employers while he idly does nothing?
Think about what you're saying.
His girlfriend sent a tweet. OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
middle school snowflake
Think about what you're saying.
His girlfriend sent a tweet. OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
Chump, you should have stuck with the "ding" schtick and used it sparingly, but you just couldn't. Now you're just full blown spam posting again.
It was. I didn't say CK's girlfriend was smart.
You're the one that's so sensitive about tweets with racial jokes.
Chump, you should have stuck with the "ding" schtick and used it sparingly, but you just couldn't. Now you're just full blown spam posting again.
Shouldn't be a problem since it cannot be associated with CK himself, according to you.
Yes, it's everyone but you that's sensitive.You're the one that's so sensitive about tweets with racial jokes.
Sure it is Chumpy. You're the first to drag race into it.
I never claimed that NFL owners and FO personnel would not be snowflakes.
It is very clear who is sensitive about this one.Yes, it's everyone but you that's sensitive.
Sure it is Chumpy. You're the first to drag race into it.
I'm sure your new buddy appreciates the assist, tho. Are you going to ask for his personal information too?
Owner,,,,I need another QB and you need a job, so here's the deal.......there will be no disrespecting the flag/anthem here,..ok? If you plan on playing that here then this interview is over. So...?
CK....ok, I do need a job.
Owner....great, now let's talk $$$$.
How many people can go to their work place with a personal agenda?
How many young black guys own an NFL team? So just how damn dumb are these guys?
Boy CK and his girlfriend sure showed that Ravens owner.
Either it's stupid or it's not stupid.
Yes it is.It is very clear who is sensitive about this one.
Tweeting is stupid, tweeting isn't stupid. It depends on your narrative.
I'm sure your new buddy appreciates the assist, tho. Are you going to ask for his personal information too?
Yep.
Yep.Yes it is.
Depends on the tweet.Tweeting is stupid, tweeting isn't stupid. It depends on your narrative.
Those were all teams with backups who had very different styles than the starter, exactly what you claimed teams try to avoid. It doesn't hold ip
That goes against post after post of pretending twitter is nothing to take seriously. You can't even stay consistent with your (cost you can't). You should've just redacted or at least downplayed your 'Baltimore snowflakes' comment. Instead, you just made yourself look like an idiot while we all had a good laugh.
For all I know Ryan Nassib is nothing special. Of course, Colin Kaepernick sucks balls; and I'm not the one who's crying about it.Those were all teams with backups who had very different styles than the starter, exactly what you claimed teams try to avoid. It doesn't hold ip
People take twitter seriously. Doesn't mean they should take twitter seriously, snowflake.That goes against post after post of pretending twitter is nothing to take seriously. You can't even stay consistent with your (cost you can't). You should've just redacted or at least downplayed your 'Baltimore snowflakes' comment. Instead, you just made yourself look like an idiot while we all had a good laugh.
Should CK (and his ) have taken twitter seriously or not?
Simple question, bro.
Should CK (and his ) have taken twitter seriously or not?
I don't know why that's funny. For the sake of clarity, Should CK (and his ) have taken twitter seriously or not?
Clarity for whom?
We gonna do this thing where we spend two pages trying to get you to answer a simple question? And you only do that when you're dead to rights, btw. So, we gonna skip the charade this time around?
My position is clear. I can't understand it for you. The tweet was stupid. Also snowflakes like you exist.
And in what post # did you answer the question of Should CK (and his ) have taken twitter seriously or not?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions