CK again.
Guilt by association.
Now you're demanding post #s.
I said it was stupid to tweet and people like you are snowflakes. That's it.
Saying it's stupid to tweet is not an answer to the question; it's a specific prescribed strategy in spite of the fact. Given that CK's did tweet, the question is: Should CK (and his ) have taken twitter seriously or not?
Guilt by association.
Now you're demanding post #s.
I said it was stupid to tweet and people like you are snowflakes. That's it.
Yes it is. Reasons have been given. You don't like it. Too bad.
You're answering a different question.
Q: Is it advisable to tweet?
A: (Via Pavlov) No, it's stupid to tweet.
Q: Should a tweeter responsibly tweet?
A: (Via Pavlov) No, it's stupid to tweet.
Sorry, your answer is not compatible.
Should CK (and his ) have taken twitter seriously or not?
You missed it. I understand you missed it. You just aren't very intelligent.
I reviewed it and found no answer. What's the post #?
Thanks for proving you aren't very intelligent.
I'm not intelligent? You just claimed that the following was an answer to the question:
"I said it was stupid to tweet and people like you are snowflakes. That's it."
That's obviously not an answer to the question, dumb ass.
Now, answer the question.
You don't win debates (by avoiding the question / pretending you answered it).
Thanks for proving you aren't very intelligent.
Should CK (and his ) have taken twitter seriously or not?
I said it was stupid.
Why do you think I said it was stupid?
Why do I think you won't answer the question? Because you know you'll look like a tragic idiot no matter what direct answer you give to the question. You know it as well.
I said it was stupid.
Why do you think I said it was stupid?
I said it was stupid.
Why do you think I said it was stupid?
Answer the question.
So that you don't have to answer the question directly. We both know the question is not is it smart/stupid to tweet. Thus your answer is N/A.
Should CK (and his ) have taken twitter seriously or not?
Nope, I said it was stupid long before you showed how stupid you were in not understanding it.
Why do you think I said it was stupid?
Answer the question.
Dude, I just answered the question DIRECTLY. You not liking the answer does not merit a re-ask.
Should CK (and his ) have taken twitter seriously or not?
I was very clear about this.
Why do you think I said it was stupid?
Answer the question.
Also
Pavlov: Why do you think I said it was stupid?I was very clear about this.
Why do you think I said it was stupid?
Answer the question.
Also
Winning Debater: So that you don't have to answer the question directly. We both know the question is not is it smart/stupid to tweet. Thus your answer is N/A.
No one has ever won a debate by declaring himself the winner in the third person.
Also
"Why do you think I said it was stupid?"No one has ever won a debate by declaring himself the winner in the third person.
Also
I think my answer shows that I perfectly understand the question. Even if you don't consider it the right answer as you'd like to define it (and you do consider it the right answer), I still did answer the question. I clearly understand it. But now you're just showing how trite you're willing to make this as each move you are in check.
Well, answer it.
You do realize your question is specifically why do I think you asked the question? I answered that. If your question was 'why is it stupid to tweet,' then you'd have a case. Are you really this stupid, or is this just the level of obstinance that you're willing to employ?
Wrong.
Try again.
Terse posts won't give you comeback, kid.
Is that English?
Maybe, this is on me. After all, you were in checkmate and I still pushed as if that was not the case. Not everyone can be gracious losers.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote